Re: deadlock_timeout - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: deadlock_timeout
Date
Msg-id 200807080207.m6827kP28626@momjian.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: deadlock_timeout  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> > Why is deadlock_timeout set at SIGHUP?
> 
> Because it's not clear what the behavior would be like if different
> backends had different settings ... except that it'd probably be
> surprising.

I have added a code comment explaining this.

--  Bruce Momjian  <bruce@momjian.us>        http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://enterprisedb.com
 + If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Missing descriptions for aggregates
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: Windows 64-bit work in progress patch