Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 1216994580.16378.2.camel@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  ("Asko Oja" <ascoja@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2008-07-25 at 09:37 +0300, Asko Oja wrote:
> Hi
> 
> One of reasons to get PL/proxy into core is to make it available to
> Windows users also.
> The idea is to get to the situation 
> 
> createlang plproxy mydb
> 
> If we can achieve this without putting plproxy into core then i would
> like to hear how.

If the installer project wants to use it on Windows they can. Of course
that assumes that it runs on windows (I have no idea if it does).

Joshua D. Drake

-- 
The PostgreSQL Company since 1997: http://www.commandprompt.com/ 
PostgreSQL Community Conference: http://www.postgresqlconference.org/
United States PostgreSQL Association: http://www.postgresql.us/
Donate to the PostgreSQL Project: http://www.postgresql.org/about/donate





pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Next
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?