Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0
Date
Msg-id 372ED376-DF77-4810-A7B5-27DD1D0BD772@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 7, 2008, at 17:18, Tom Lane wrote:

> No, but you were: you proposed using strncmp for everything.

Yes, that's right. I was trying to understand why I wouldn't use just  
one or the other. And the answer turned out to be, you wouldn't,  
except that strncmp() is an desirable optimization for = and <>. So  
I've changed only those.

Phew, I think I'm clear now. Thanks!

DAvid


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Data type OID numbers fixed?
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v2