Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From David E. Wheeler
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 2ED21153-6552-45B1-A1CD-9F1C8900A07B@kineticode.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Jul 29, 2008, at 11:01, Tom Lane wrote:

> "David E. Wheeler" <david@kineticode.com> writes:
>> Damn, I was away from mail yesterday; sorry. I have some revisions,
>> mostly improving casting compatibility with text.
>
> Huh?  What's to improve?
>
> I know that you're still fooling with the regexp functions, but I
> figured that could be added later.
>
>> Tom, have you committed anything yet?
>
> No, but I've put a couple of hours into editorialization and don't
> want to throw that away.  How about you wait for my commit and then
> send a patch revising whatever you want to?

Sure. It's mostly just additional casts and tests. I'd be happy to  
integrate it into your commit.

Thanks,

David



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Next
From: "Robert Haas"
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql