On 7/25/08, Hiroshi Saito <z-saito@guitar.ocn.ne.jp> wrote:
> I tackled with hope temporarily. It seems that some adjustment is still
> required.
> http://winpg.jp/~saito/pg_work/plproxy/
> However, windows user desires to use. Of course, it is also me.
> Regards,
> Hiroshi Saito
Thanks, I applied the patch to CVS, with minor changes:
- Use HAVE_SYS_SELECT_H instead of WIN32 for <sys/select.h>
- Do SHLIB_LINK += instead of separate var.
Could you please test the attached patch or CVS HEAD,
whether everything works fine now?
Btw, do not worry about regtest failure in plproxy_many,
this is due to differences in system random() function.
The test should rewritten, although I have not yet decided how...
--
marko
