Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ryan Bradetich
Subject Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types
Date
Msg-id e739902b0807300024p35b658f5pd9fd060b15e5a6ad@mail.gmail.com
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: Type Categories for User-Defined Types  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom,

On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 2:33 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Yeah, that's the point of the proposal.  I think the issue has come up
> once or twice before, too, else I'd not be so interested in a general
> solution.  (digs in archives ... there was some discussion of this
> in connection with unsigned integer types, and I seem to recall older
> threads but can't find any right now.)

Anything I should be looking into and/or testing for unsigned integer support?

Thanks!

- Ryan

P.S. I have most of the uint2 and uint4 types implemented.  I am currently
working on the unit and performance testing.  I need to upgrade one of
my Linux boxes first before I can complete my testing. I am hoping to post
my code and performance testing later this week.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: "Pavel Stehule"
Date:
Subject: Re: TABLE-function patch vs plpgsql
Next
From: ITAGAKI Takahiro
Date:
Subject: Copy storage parameters on CREATE TABLE LIKE/INHERITS