Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Martijn van Oosterhout
Subject Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id 20080704085103.GA6696@svana.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: A Windows x64 port of PostgreSQL  ("Ken Camann" <kjcamann@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 03, 2008 at 01:45:06AM -0400, Ken Camann wrote:
> When 32-bit arrived (much too late, at Microsoft) most x86 compilers
> that had formerly used the segmented memory model made int 4 bytes
> like people felt "it was supposed to be" but left long at 4 the way it
> was so as not to bloat all the variables to double words on such a
> register-poor architecture as x86.

The usual way to talk about these things is that unix systems went for
LP64 and Microsoft apparently went for LLP64. This link

http://www.unix.org/version2/whatsnew/lp64_wp.html

talks about it. I don't think anyone is going to change their position
on this now.

Have a nice day,
--
Martijn van Oosterhout   <kleptog@svana.org>   http://svana.org/kleptog/
> Please line up in a tree and maintain the heap invariant while
> boarding. Thank you for flying nlogn airlines.

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Teodor Sigaev
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Multi-column GIN
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCHES] Explain XML patch v2