"Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com> writes:
> On 6/26/08, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
>> BTW, I don't think you can use that same-length optimization for
>> citext. There's no reason to think that upper/lowercase pairs will
>> have the same length all the time in multibyte encodings.
> What about this code in current str_tolower():
> /* Output workspace cannot have more codes than input bytes */
> workspace = (wchar_t *) palloc((nbytes + 1) * sizeof(wchar_t));
That's working with wchars, not bytes.
regards, tom lane
