Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Andrew Gierth
Subject Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Date
Msg-id 87bq0hr8n2.fsf@news-spur.riddles.org.uk
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
>>>>> "Gregory" == Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com> writes:
Gregory> I just wonder where all these examples of real-world queriesGregory> were when I posted this patch and asked
forsuch feedbackGregory> originally. sigh.
 
Gregory> In any case I think we've already made this decision. If weGregory> wanted the 80% solution it was ready for
Postgres8.3. ItGregory> wouldn't make much sense to skip it then but put it in nowGregory> when that there's time to
finishit and a lot of the work'sGregory> already done.
 

I wasn't paying much attention in the 8.3 development phases so I have
no idea what patch you had then.

The patch under review is for WITH RECURSIVE, not just for WITH, and it
handles a large enough proportion of the use-cases for recursive queries
(I've never seen a requirement for mutual recursion in the wild, though
I've several times had to kludge around pg lack of recursion support)
that I think it should be included in 8.4 either as-is, or with whatever
improvements are possible between now and release.

-- 
Andrew (irc:RhodiumToad)


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Decibel!
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.
Next
From: "Guillaume Smet"
Date:
Subject: Re: CVS Head psql bug?