Zdenek Kotala escribió:
> The example is when you have translation data (vocabulary) in database.
> But the reason is that ANSI specify (chapter 4.2) charset as a part of
> string descriptor. See below:
>
> — The length or maximum length in characters of the character string type.
> — The catalog name, schema name, and character set name of the character
> set of the character string type.
> — The catalog name, schema name, and collation name of the collation of
> the character string type.
We already support multiple charsets, and are able to do conversions
between them. The set of charsets is hardcoded and it's hard to make a
case that a user needs to create new ones. I concur with Martijn's
suggestion -- there's no need for this to appear in a system catalog.
Perhaps it could be argued that we need to be able to specify the
charset a given string is in -- currently all strings are in the server
encoding (charset) which is fixed at initdb time. Making the system
support multiple server encodings would be a major undertaking in itself
and I'm not sure that there's a point.
--
Alvaro Herrera http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
PostgreSQL Replication, Consulting, Custom Development, 24x7 support
