Re: [patch] plproxy v2 - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Joshua D. Drake
Subject Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Date
Msg-id 1215532719.29901.16.camel@jd-laptop
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [patch] plproxy v2  ("Marko Kreen" <markokr@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Re: [patch] plproxy v2
List pgsql-hackers

On Tue, 2008-07-08 at 18:43 +0300, Marko Kreen wrote:
> On 7/8/08, Joshua D. Drake <jd@commandprompt.com> wrote:
> > First let me say that I too enjoy PL/Proxy quite a bit. However, I don't
> >  think it needs to be in core. I wouldn't mind seeing it in contrib (or
> >  better yet modules/ should we ever get around to that).
> 
> I'm not against contrib/ considering that the docs are now nicely
> integrated, but then, whats the difference between src/pl/ and contrib/?
> 

I am actually against adding to the grammar which is what Simon was
suggesting. If it wants to go into src/pl I wouldn't have a problem with
that. Sorry for not being more clear.

Joshua D. Drake




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] plproxy v2
Next
From: Simon Riggs
Date:
Subject: Re: [patch] plproxy v2