Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 29907.1217285304@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>)
List pgsql-hackers
Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org> writes:
> That said, this is no more of a deal than that text also has a default
> collation. You talk about "the database's default collation" but with
> proper collation support that statement is meaningless.

Well, we had better still be able to support the concept, or a lot
of applications that work fine today will fail.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Martijn van Oosterhout
Date:
Subject: Re: WITH RECUSIVE patches 0723
Next
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [RFC] Unsigned integer support.