Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
Date
Msg-id 22836.1216012003@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com>)
Responses Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments  (Oleg Bartunov <oleg@sai.msu.su>)
List pgsql-hackers
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@commandprompt.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Isn't the vacuum_delay_point() good enough?

> But that's in the outer loop ... I mean here:

You'd need one heckuva lot of lexemes in a tsvector to make that
important.  Do we have CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS() in any other loops
over tsvector contents?  I kinda doubt it ...

(I have no real objection to adding CHECK_FOR_INTERRUPTS there,
I'm just questioning the value.)
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Alvaro Herrera
Date:
Subject: Re: gsoc, text search selectivity and dllist enhancments
Next
From: "David E. Wheeler"
Date:
Subject: Re: PATCH: CITEXT 2.0 v3