Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Simon Riggs
Subject Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
Date
Msg-id 1216377325.19656.770.camel@ebony.2ndQuadrant
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving  (Gregory Stark <stark@enterprisedb.com>)
Responses Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving  ("Xiao Meng" <mx.cogito@gmail.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 11:07 +0100, Gregory Stark wrote:
> "Simon Riggs" <simon@2ndquadrant.com> writes:

> hash lookups can in theory be O(1).

I'm not sure whether that applies here? I'm interested in how *this*
patch will work, not in more generic algorithm theory.

To patch authors: Can we please see a table showing expected number of
logical I/Os (i,e, block accesses) for btrees and hash indexes

e.g. for 100-byte rows...

rows    btree        hash
----    -----        ----
10^2
10^3
10^4
10^5
10^6
10^7
10^8

-- Simon Riggs           www.2ndQuadrant.comPostgreSQL Training, Services and Support



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Gregory Stark
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH]-hash index improving
Next
From: chris
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres-R: primary key patches