Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Alvaro Herrera
Subject Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date
Msg-id 20080723204430.GD3580@alvh.no-ip.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:

> I didn't get much further than that because I got discouraged after
> looking at the locking issues around the pending-insertions list.
> It's a mess:

These are rather severe problems.  Maybe there's a better solution, but
perhaps it would be good enough to lock out concurrent access to the
index while the bulkinsert procedure is working.




-- 
Alvaro Herrera                                http://www.CommandPrompt.com/
The PostgreSQL Company - Command Prompt, Inc.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Oleg Bartunov
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Fragments in tsearch2 headline
Next
From: "Manoel Henrique"
Date:
Subject: Re: Research/Implementation of Nested Loop Join optimization