Hi,
Tom Lane wrote:
> You should also look at the current code for communication between
> autovac launcher and autovac workers. That seems to be largely a
> similar problem, and it's been solved in a way that seems to be
> safe enough with respect to the postmaster vs shared memory issue.
Oh yeah, thanks for reminding me. Back when it was added I thought I
might find some helpful insights in there. But I didn't ever take the
time to read through it...
Regards
Markus Wanner
