Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?
Date
Msg-id 200807231743.01858.peter_e@gmx.net
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: Do we really want to migrate plproxy and citext into PG core distribution?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Am Wednesday, 23. July 2008 schrieb Tom Lane:
> As soon as a Fedora release happens, I'm
> constrained by compatibility issues as to what I can put into that
> branch.  RHEL releases ten times more so.  I gather that Debian, for
> instance, is even more paranoid than Red Hat about upstream version
> bumps.

Debian and Ubuntu have backport repositories that users can selectively refer 
to.  SUSE has the openSUSE build service, which serves a similar function.  
So for these platforms, the infrastructure is there, and given infinite 
packaging hands (which we would need under any scheme, of course), all the 
packages in all the necessary versions can be provided through the right 
channels (defined as, where a user of the environment would look).  So I 
don't think having our own repository is a problem or even desirable for 
these OS/distributions.

And for Red Hat, we have pgsqlrpms.org, which already covers what you 
describe.


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [PATCH] "\ef " in psql