Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements
Date
Msg-id 15378.1216825535@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [PATCHES] GIN improvements  (Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>)
List pgsql-hackers
Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru> writes:
> So, may be we just move insertcleanup call to   ginbulkdelete/ginvacuumcleanup 
> but leave aminsertcleanup field in pg_proc for a future.

I'd be inclined not to add the extra AM call if we aren't going to use
it now.  There's no very good reason to think that a definition we
settled on today would be exactly the right thing for whatever future
need might appear.  Better to wait till we have a concrete example to
design around.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: Postgres-R: internal messaging
Next
From: Zdenek Kotala
Date:
Subject: Re: pltcl_*mod commands are broken on Solaris 10