Re: initdb in current cvs head broken? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Sushant Sinha
Subject Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?
Date
Msg-id 1215694363.5948.26.camel@dragflick
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?  ("Pavan Deolasee" <pavan.deolasee@gmail.com>)
Responses Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
You are right. I did not do make clean last time. After make clean, make
all, and make install it works fine. 

-Sushant.

On Thu, 2008-07-10 at 17:55 +0530, Pavan Deolasee wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 10, 2008 at 5:36 PM, Sushant Sinha <sushant354@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > Seems like a bug to me. Is the tree stable only after commit fests and I
> > should not use the unstable tree for generating patches?
> >
> 
> I quickly tried on my repo and its working fine. (Well it could be a
> bit out of sync with the head).
> 
> Usually, the tree may get a bit inconsistent during the active period,
> but its not very common. I've seen committers doing a good job before
> checking in any code and making sure it works fine (atleast initdb and
> regression tests).
> 
> I would suggest doing a clean build at your end once again.
> 
> Thanks,
> Pavan
> 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Andrew Dunstan
Date:
Subject: Re: initdb in current cvs head broken?
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: CREATE CAST too strict?