Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 October 1999

• 03:55   Re: TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart
• 03:56   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Thomas Lockhart
• 07:23   pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA
• 07:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Zakkr
• 10:45   Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release Oleg Bartunov
• 10:48   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Christof Petig
• 10:48   are subtransactions not nestable? Christof Petig
• 11:13   problem compiling current sources with gcc 2.95.1 Oleg Bartunov
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA Masaaki
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] are subtransactions not nestable? Bruce Momjian
• 15:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:15   attribute distinct values estimate Roberto Cornacchia
• 17:17   Rexx interface po postgres ? Oleg Bartunov
• 18:03   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Keith Parks
• 19:12   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Bruce Momjian
• 20:33   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
• 20:40   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Tom Lane
• 21:28   testing unsubscribe Jackson, DeJuan

2 October 1999

• 00:53   Tricky query, tricky response Peter Eisentraut
• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Peter Eisentraut
• 00:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Roland Roberts
• 02:38   Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] pgbash-1.1.1 release SAKAIDA
• 10:26   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Thomas Lockhart
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup from unportable SSL patch Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests on intel for 6.5.2 Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.2 Keith Parks
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Tom Lane
• 17:24   Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #1 Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: [HACKERS] Doccumentation Patch for Create Function Tom Lane
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] Doccumentation Patch for Create Function frankpit@pop.dn.net
• 22:57   'iscachable' only partially solves premature constant coercion Tom Lane

3 October 1999

• 05:15   Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Thomas Lockhart
• 07:55   Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 11:08   Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Peter Eisentraut
• 11:08   getopt_long (was Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dead on startup ...) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions Tom Lane
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 The Hermit Hacker
• 18:56   Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 The Hermit Hacker
• 18:57   Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #2 The Hermit Hacker

4 October 1999

• 10:23   Re: [HACKERS] NULL as an argument in plpgsql functions wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:12   Status of 'now' column defaults Tom Lane
• 17:57   MATLAB mex file for PostgreSQL G. Anthony Reina
• 20:39   unsubscribe Frederick Cheeseborough

5 October 1999

• 00:48   Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Tom Lane
• 00:49   Re: [HACKERS] MATLAB mex file for PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Bruce Momjian
• 07:44   User types using large objects. Is it really possible? Jose Antonio Cotelo lema
• 08:24   RE: [HACKERS] Recovery on incomplete write Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:29   Questions about bufmgr Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:40   Re: [HACKERS] Questions about bufmgr Vadim Mikheev
• 08:49   Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:51   How to add a new build-in operator Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:09   initdb problem on sun solaris sparc Geeta Mahesh
• 10:52   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator Thomas Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] Planner drops unreferenced tables --- bug, no? Tom Lane
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 13:59   6.5.2 vacuum NOTICE messages Oleg Bartunov
• 14:13   CREATE RULE syntax simplification Tom Lane
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator Bruce Momjian
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 19:41   Database names with spaces Peter Eisentraut
• 19:41   psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut
• 19:41   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 20:06   Request inforamation Henry Molina
• 20:11   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Oleg Bartunov
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian
• 20:14   Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian
• 20:33   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Bruce Momjian
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 21:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Tom Lane

6 October 1999

• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.2 vacuum NOTICE messages Vadim Mikheev
• 01:48   libpq++ doc error? Vince Vielhaber
• 02:11   Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces Bruce Momjian
• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Roland Roberts
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Matthew N. Dodd
• 04:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Luuk de Boer
• 05:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 07:09   RE: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Ansley, Michael
• 07:34   AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker
• 12:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysqlcomparison Bruce Momjian
• 13:08   psql and comments Thomas Lockhart
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error? Tom Lane
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Vince Vielhaber
• 13:22   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql c omparison Ansley, Michael
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ doc error? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Don Baccus
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison The Hermit Hacker
• 15:15   Error messages (was Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:15   ... Peter Eisentraut
• 15:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Peter Eisentraut
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian
• 18:07   union and LIMIT problem Oleg Bartunov
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian
• 19:18   Re: [HACKERS] Database names with spaces sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 19:20   Re: [HACKERS] Database names with space (II) sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:58   Re: AW: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:58   Re: psql and comments Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian
• 21:29   WAL Bootstrap/Startup/Shutdown committed... Vadim Mikheev
• 22:02   ... Tom Lane

7 October 1999

• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 1 Roland Roberts
• 08:54   Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:06   Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:03   password in pg_shadow Zakkr
• 10:20   RE: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Peter Mount
• 10:44   (no subject) Alessio Bragadini
• 10:57   RE: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Zakkr
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart
• 12:34   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Thomas Lockhart
• 13:17   Re: PostgreSQL Help wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 13:52   RE: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL Help Peter Mount
• 14:02   Privilege for attribute (columns) Zakkr
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Thomas Lockhart
• 14:33   Re: psql and comments Thomas Lockhart
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: [HACKERS] password in pg_shadow Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Tom Lane
• 16:37   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Tom Lane
• 16:51   Top N queries and disbursion Roberto Cornacchia
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian
• 22:17   Re: Top N queries and disbursion Tom Lane
• 22:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Tom Lane
• 22:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian
• 22:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and comments Bruce Momjian

8 October 1999

• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL Help Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:48   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 03:15   Cleanup of debugging flags, SSL Bruce Momjian
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] Cleanup of debugging flags, SSL Bruce Momjian
• 04:03   Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 10:16   mysql-PostgreSQL comparisons Vince Vielhaber
• 11:38   RI status report #4 (come and join) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Roberto Cornacchia
• 12:43   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Ansley, Michael
• 12:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #4 (come and join) Brook Milligan
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] RI status report #4 (come and join) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Tom Lane
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Tom Lane
• 14:07   Features for next release Thomas Lockhart
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Top N queries and disbursion Bruce Momjian
• 16:07   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 16:30   Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Lamar Owen
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.] Bruce Momjian
• 18:13   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Michael Meskes
• 19:10   SPARC problem with WAL additions? Keith Parks
• 21:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Tom Lane
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Tom Lane

9 October 1999

• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Re: [PHP3] Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Thomas Lockhart
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Thomas Lockhart
• 01:48   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian
• 01:56   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian
• 08:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Adriaan Joubert
• 09:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Bruce Momjian
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut
• 11:51   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian
• 11:54   Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 12:03   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Vince Vielhaber
• 13:52   memory problems in copying large table Martin Weinberg
• 14:04   memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg
• 14:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Tom Lane
• 15:06   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Tom Lane
• 20:01   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian

10 October 1999

• 11:35   pgxml 1.0 released Jeroen van Vianen
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Tom Lane
• 15:55   Mention of FAQ in shared memory/ipc errors Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Sergio A. Kessler
• 19:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 23:40   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg

11 October 1999

• 00:34   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Tom Lane
• 02:09   Looking for pgsql programmer Victor Kane
• 03:21   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg
• 07:33   --with-mb-encoding? Allan Huffman
• 08:33   vaccum problem Oleg Bartunov
• 09:09   RE: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:47   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:40   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Vince Vielhaber
• 12:46   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 12:46   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Bruce Momjian
• 13:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL Help Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Tom Lane
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Thomas Lockhart
• 14:25   Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL. Lamar Owen
• 14:33   RE: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Thomas Lockhart
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] memory problems in copying large table to STDOUT Martin Weinberg
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 15:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Brook Milligan
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Brook Milligan
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 16:06   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) James Thompson
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Brook Milligan
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Lamar Owen
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] Next release is 7.0(?) Tom Lane
• 18:09   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Tom Lane
• 18:12   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator)] Bruce Momjian
• 18:16   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 18:18   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 18:20   pginterface/pgeasy Bruce Momjian
• 18:50   psql Week 2 Peter Eisentraut
• 18:50   bison Peter Eisentraut
• 19:30   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 Bruce Momjian
• 19:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Sergio A. Kessler
• 19:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 20:43   Regression tests (was Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:43   Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:44   Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Peter Eisentraut
• 21:31   Re: Regression tests (was Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments) Bruce Momjian
• 21:31   Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)) Bruce Momjian
• 22:00   Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)) Lamar Owen
• 23:21   RE: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue

12 October 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:06   Different BLKSZ Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 Tom Lane
• 01:15   RE: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:11   Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)) Sergio A. Kessler
• 02:26   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type The Hermit Hacker
• 03:11   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release The Hermit Hacker
• 03:14   mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 03:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:25   Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)) The Hermit Hacker
• 06:08   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:28   Backend proceses Grzegorz Przeździecki
• 08:01   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Vadim Mikheev
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:19   Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:20   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Vadim Mikheev
• 08:33   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:53   HELP - Accessing SQL_ASCII from Java Allan Huffman
• 09:10   win32 port on newer Cygwin snapshots (990115) Horak Daniel
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:39   It's PR time! Peter Eisentraut
• 10:00   RE: [HACKERS] It's PR time! Peter Mount
• 12:39   Re: Regression tests (was Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments) Thomas Lockhart
• 12:39   Re: [HACKERS] bison Thomas Lockhart
• 12:43   Re: [HACKERS] It's PR time! Martin Weinberg
• 13:02   Re: Regression tests (was Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments) Bruce Momjian
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Bruce Momjian
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Bruce Momjian
• 13:16   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Tom Lane
• 13:28   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] bison Tom Lane
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release The Hermit Hacker
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 13:53   Dead CVS directories Bruce Momjian
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] win32 port on newer Cygwin snapshots (990115) Bruce Momjian
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 14:02   RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release Peter Mount
• 14:03   RE: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directories Peter Mount
• 14:04   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directories Bruce Momjian
• 14:11   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 14:29   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directories Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directories The Hermit Hacker
• 14:33   RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release The Hermit Hacker
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directoriesh Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   RE: [HACKERS] Features for next release Peter Mount
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Oliver Elphick
• 15:05   New HISTORY file Bruce Momjian
• 15:09   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release Bruce Momjian
• 15:26   New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:29   RE: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directories Ansley, Michael
• 15:33   Re: [HACKERS] Features for next release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:37   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.)u Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Bruce Momjian
• 15:41   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bernard Frankpitt
• 15:48   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 16:10   PostgreSQL book proposal Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Book PDF file was corrupt Bruce Momjian
• 16:17   Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 16:22   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Lamar Owen
• 16:27   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Bruce Momjian
• 16:27   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Vince Vielhaber
• 16:28   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:40   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Lamar Owen
• 16:45   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:46   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Bruce Momjian
• 17:31   cvsweb Oleg Bartunov
• 17:32   empty/automatic insert availability Daniel Péder
• 17:34   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Bruce Momjian
• 17:46   Packaging questions and ideas for 7 Lamar Owen
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] cvsweb Lamar Owen
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] cvsweb The Hermit Hacker
• 18:15   createlang plpgsql template1 failed in current CVS Oleg Bartunov
• 18:15   Re: [HACKERS] cvsweb Oleg Bartunov
• 18:17   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:29   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Oleg Bartunov
• 18:39   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Bruce Momjian
• 18:40   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Bruce Momjian
• 18:56   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Bruce Momjian
• 19:07   Re: [GENERAL] stored procedure revisited (fwd) Peter Mount
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] cvsweb Vince Vielhaber
• 19:17   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Lamar Owen
• 19:21   [Fwd: cvsweb-1.73-1.noarch] Lamar Owen
• 19:51   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Oliver Elphick
• 19:54   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Oliver Elphick
• 19:56   JDBC Driver Peter Mount
• 19:56   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] JDBC Driver Bruce Momjian
• 20:18   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Vince Vielhaber
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?) Craig Orsinger
• 22:23   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book gravity
• 22:36   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book gravity
• 22:56   RE: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Vince Vielhaber
• 23:27   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:31   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 23:31   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 23:56   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Vince Vielhaber

13 October 1999

• 01:20   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:41   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 01:47   Updated book outline Bruce Momjian
• 03:11   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Matthew N. Dodd
• 03:16   Win32 client... J. Michael Roberts
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
• 03:51   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Tom Lane
• 06:48   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Theo Kramer
• 06:53   RE: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might enjoy about PGSQL.) Peter Mount
• 06:55   RE: [HACKERS] Book PDF file was corrupt Peter Mount
• 07:00   RE: [HACKERS] JDBC Driver Peter Mount
• 07:08   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Dmitry Samersoff
• 07:14   RE: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Ansley, Michael
• 07:23   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
• 07:47   Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 08:32   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Andy Duncan
• 08:41   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Hannu Krosing
• 08:45   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Hannu Krosing
• 08:53   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Vince Vielhaber
• 08:56   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
• 09:02   Re: [HACKERS] Updated book outline Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
• 09:03   sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
• 09:13   RE: Scan by TID (was RE: [HACKERS] How to add a new build-in operator) Hiroshi Inoue
• 10:00   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you might Bruce Momjian
• 10:05   Re: [DOCS] RE: [HACKERS] Book PDF file was corrupt Bruce Momjian
• 10:10   Re: [HACKERS] JDBC Driver Bruce Momjian
• 10:12   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 10:13   update for shlib makefiles on win32 Horak Daniel
• 10:13   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 10:15   Re: [DOCS] RE: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 10:21   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 10:22   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 10:35   Re: [HACKERS] Updated book outline Bruce Momjian
• 10:35   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Vince Vielhaber
• 10:39   Re: [HACKERS] update for shlib makefiles on win32 Bruce Momjian
• 10:40   PDF version of book outline Bruce Momjian
• 10:50   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Peter Eisentraut
• 10:51   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book The Hermit Hacker
• 10:54   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Vince Vielhaber
• 11:08   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Peter Eisentraut
• 11:11   Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 11:51   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 11:52   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Bruce Momjian
• 12:11   RE: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Peter Mount
• 12:18   RE: [HACKERS] Scripts again Dmitry Samersoff
• 12:26   psql history buffer. Nigel Tamplin
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again The Hermit Hacker
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Vince Vielhaber
• 13:08   Re: [HACKERS] Dead CVS directoriesh Brian E Gallew
• 13:18   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:42   Bood Idea Jeff MacDonald
• 13:52   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Karsten Schulz
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] psql history buffer. Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book The Hermit Hacker
• 14:52   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Jimmie Houchin
• 14:53   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Lamar Owen
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 15:47   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Jimmie Houchin
• 15:51   the oid is uknown during execution of rule..insert ? (psql ver 6.5.2) Daniel Péder
• 16:01   SQL Functions on Composite Types - what's the purpose?? Jörg Rudnick
• 16:02   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   Re: [DOCS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Stephens
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   The new globe Michael Meskes
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 Peter Eisentraut
• 19:39   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 19:40   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 19:40   Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Peter Eisentraut
• 19:40   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:25   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Bruce Momjian
• 20:38   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgresuser's password? Lamar Owen
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Oleg Bartunov
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgresuser's password? Bruce Momjian

14 October 1999

• 00:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 2 Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:52   Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Lincoln Yeoh
• 07:41   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Nicolas Huillard
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 10:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgresuser's password? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:18   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again The Hermit Hacker
• 12:52   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Jeff MacDonald
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Henry B. Hotz
• 16:10   Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Aaron J. Seigo
• 16:18   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Aaron J. Seigo
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe Bruce Momjian
• 17:50   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] How do I activate and change the postgres user's password? Nicolas Huillard
• 21:04   TAB doesn't work in psql Bruce Momjian

15 October 1999

• 00:32   ORACLE COMMENT statement Mike Mascari
• 00:55   Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Bruce Momjian
• 01:30   Re: [INTERFACES] pgbash-1.1.1 release Clark C. Evans
• 02:02   Why I am writing a book Bruce Momjian
• 03:37   Re: [HACKERS] bison Thomas Lockhart
• 03:43   Re: can postgres do this? Thomas Lockhart
• 03:56   Re: [HACKERS] empty/automatic insert availability Thomas Lockhart
• 03:57   int8 Bruce Momjian
• 03:57   int8 type Bruce Momjian
• 04:25   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Thomas Lockhart
• 04:29   Adult VCDs ! Look here! 2997 mpibkf@Here.com
• 04:50   Re: [HACKERS] ORACLE COMMENT statement Thomas Lockhart
• 08:31   Re: [HACKERS] TAB doesn't work in psql Peter Eisentraut
• 08:37   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 09:12   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Hannu Krosing
• 09:23   Re: [HACKERS] bison wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:33   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:49   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again Peter Eisentraut
• 11:00   Re: Scripts (was Re: [HACKERS] Re: [INTERFACES] Next release is 7.0(?)) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:08   Re: [HACKERS] Scripts again The Hermit Hacker
• 12:07   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe Michael Meskes
• 13:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: can postgres do this? Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] TAB doesn't work in psql Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:12   indexable and locale Goran Thyni
• 18:53   vacuum of permanently updating database Oleg Bartunov

16 October 1999

• 00:08   RE: [HACKERS] vacuum of permanently updating database Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:07   Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:30   Tr: Functions documentations Stéphane FILLON
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] The new globe Michael Meskes
• 13:10   to_char(), md5() (long) Zakkr
• 13:27   RE: [HACKERS] vacuum of permanently updating database Oleg Bartunov
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] to_char(), md5() (long) Oliver Elphick
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Tom Lane
• 19:30   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 19:37   Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Peter Eisentraut
• 19:38   Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Peter Eisentraut
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] int8 type Peter Eisentraut
• 19:38   pg_type questions Peter Eisentraut
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] Different BLKSZ Tatsuo Ishii

17 October 1999

• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] pg_type questions Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   Marc's initial request to start Postgres95 development Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   RE: [HACKERS] Marc's initial request to start Postgres95 develop Vince Vielhaber
• 02:22   Re: [HACKERS] Marc's initial request to start Postgres95 develop Bruce Momjian
• 02:26   Re: [HACKERS] Marc's initial request to start Postgres95 develop Vince Vielhaber
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] Marc's initial request to start Postgres95 develop Bruce Momjian
• 02:58   Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Mike Mascari
• 03:58   Re: [HACKERS] Marc's initial request to start Postgres95 develop The Hermit Hacker
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] pg_type questions Tom Lane
• 15:41   is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Oleg Bartunov
• 16:02   Re: [HACKERS] pg_type questions Bruce Momjian
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Bruce Momjian
• 18:42   don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Peter Eisentraut
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Bruce Momjian
• 19:00   insertable views - not copy-able ? Daniel Péder
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Oleg Bartunov
• 20:48   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] pg_type questions Peter Eisentraut
• 21:31   Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Peter Eisentraut
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Mike Mascari
• 22:33   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Tom Lane
• 22:54   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 22:56   RE: [HACKERS] vacuum of permanently updating database Hiroshi Inoue

18 October 1999

• 00:05   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Bruce Momjian
• 00:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORACLE COMMENT statement Bruce Momjian
• 00:12   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:07   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Bruce Momjian
• 03:18   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Tom Lane
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Bruce Momjian
• 04:16   Re: [HACKERS] don't know whether nodes of type 719 are equal Tom Lane
• 04:37   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:09   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:27   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Oleg Bartunov
• 06:47   Re: [HACKERS] to_char(), md5() (long) Zakkr
• 07:14   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Hannu Krosing
• 07:40   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Oleg Bartunov
• 07:58   Re: [HACKERS] insertable views - not copy-able ? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] to_char(), md5() (long) Oliver Elphick
• 12:43   Re: [HACKERS] Tr: Functions documentations Thomas Lockhart
• 13:26   problem with PostgreSQL and LAN Jacek Witczak
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Tr: Functions documentations Oleg Bartunov
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 18:31   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:37   Re: New developer globe (was: Re: [HACKERS] Interesting Quote you Matthew N. Dodd
• 19:59   Historical post of Marc to support Postgres95 development bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 20:02   Another historical message from the early days of PostgreSQL development bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 23:59   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue

19 October 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 02:18   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] Another historical message from the early days of PostgreSQL development Vadim Mikheev
• 03:33   funny psql output Bruce Momjian
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Vadim Mikheev
• 03:43   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Tom Lane
• 04:06   Re: [HACKERS] funny psql output Tom Lane
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Oleg Bartunov
• 04:34   Re: [HACKERS] is it possible to use LIMIT and INTERSECT ? Tom Lane
• 04:46   Postgres problems with 6.4 / 6.5 (fwd) Oliver Elphick
• 05:17   ... Victoria W.
• 07:49   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:04   Re: [HACKERS] funny psql output Bruce Momjian
• 08:47   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:59   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:54   Re: New developer globe Peter Eisentraut
• 10:15   RE: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe Peter Mount
• 10:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:49   RE: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe Peter Mount
• 12:25   Re: [SQL] insertable views - not copy-able ? Herouth Maoz
• 13:03   Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe Tom Lane
• 13:17   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:35   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Oleg Broytmann
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Tom Lane
• 13:50   Need refresh on main page... Thomas Lockhart
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Oleg Broytmann
• 14:02   Re: [BUGS] Postgres problems with 6.4 / 6.5 (fwd) Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: Need refresh on main page... Vince Vielhaber
• 14:18   Re: Need refresh on main page... Lamar Owen
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Lamar Owen
• 14:45   Re: Need refresh on main page... Lamar Owen
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe Lamar Owen
• 14:54   Re: Need refresh on main page... Vince Vielhaber
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Need refresh on main page... Zakkr
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:39   Re: Need refresh on main page... Vince Vielhaber
• 15:46   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Need refresh on main page... Lamar Owen
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Need refresh on main page... Lamar Owen
• 17:12   Re: Need refresh on main page... Lamar Owen
• 18:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Postgres problems with 6.4 / 6.5 (fwd) Mike Mascari
• 18:39   psql Week 3 Peter Eisentraut
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 3 Bruce Momjian
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 20:59   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 20:59   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 20:59   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 21:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Need refresh on main page... Oliver Elphick
• 21:33   book status Bruce Momjian
• 21:52   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 3 Oliver Elphick
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 3 Aaron J. Seigo
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 3 Bruce Momjian
• 22:21   book Bruce Momjian
• 23:38   Re: [HACKERS] book The Hermit Hacker
• 23:41   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:43   Re: [HACKERS] book Bruce Momjian
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian

20 October 1999

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:06   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] book The Hermit Hacker
• 01:06   current_time? Vince Vielhaber
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Vadim Mikheev
• 01:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe Vadim Mikheev
• 02:48   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Vadim Mikheev
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Bruce Momjian
• 03:09   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Vadim Mikheev
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Tom Lane
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Vadim Mikheev
• 03:40   Re: Need refresh on main page... Thomas Lockhart
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] current_time? Tom Lane
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] book status Tom Lane
• 04:32   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Thomas Lockhart
• 04:49   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Tom Lane
• 04:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: New developer globe Michael Meskes
• 05:11   Creating operators Gene Sokolov
• 05:18   Re: [HACKERS] book status Kaare Rasmussen
• 05:54   Re: [HACKERS] Creating operators Tom Lane
• 06:11   RE: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Peter Mount
• 06:15   RE: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Peter Mount
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Vadim Mikheev
• 06:38    Gerd Thielemann AEK
• 06:48   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Milan Zamazal
• 07:04   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Milan Zamazal
• 07:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Need refresh on main page... Zakkr
• 07:58   laser printer toner advertisement art123@visto.com
• 08:12   enabling using index in ORDER BY ... desc Oleg Bartunov
• 08:38   How to hack Chris Jones Encryption Algorithmn HSBC
• 09:01   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:21   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 3 Peter Eisentraut
• 09:35   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Peter Eisentraut
• 09:48   Re: [HACKERS] current_time? Vince Vielhaber
• 09:56   Re: [HACKERS] book status Vince Vielhaber
• 10:16   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Vince Vielhaber
• 10:24   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:52   Re: [HACKERS] Creating operators Thomas Lockhart
• 12:11   Re: PostgreSQL Perl Module Thomas Lockhart
• 12:50   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Intrac Systems Inc
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Brook Milligan
• 14:39   Planning final assault on query length limits Tom Lane
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Bruce Momjian
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Tom Lane
• 15:11   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Bruce Momjian
• 15:27   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 15:48   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Lamar Owen
• 16:17   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Brook Milligan
• 16:21   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Brook Milligan
• 16:45   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Bruce Momjian
• 16:45   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Bruce Momjian
• 16:58   Book on web site Bruce Momjian
• 16:59   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Brook Milligan
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Brook Milligan
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] Book on web site Mike Mascari
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] Book on web site Bruce Momjian
• 17:38   translate function (BUG?) Edwin Ramirez
• 17:38   Re: [HACKERS] book status Jimmie Houchin
• 17:50   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Tom Lane
• 18:22   Re: PostgreSQL Perl Module Lamar Owen
• 22:57   distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Vince Vielhaber
• 23:43   New psql startup banner Bruce Momjian

21 October 1999

• 00:11   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Tom Lane
• 00:17   Re: [HACKERS] translate function (BUG?) Tom Lane
• 00:48   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Vince Vielhaber
• 01:41   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 02:50   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 05:53   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Peter Mount
• 06:15   RE: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Peter Mount
• 06:34   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Oleg Broytmann
• 08:53   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Vince Vielhaber
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Tom Lane
• 12:38   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Tom Lane
• 12:50   RE: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Ansley, Michael
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Damond Walker
• 13:44   RE: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Paul Becker
• 13:50   AW: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 14:10   Re: AW: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:10   GPL vs BSD licencing - a new twist Peter Mount
• 14:11   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Lamar Owen
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] GPL vs BSD licencing - a new twist Vince Vielhaber
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Tom Lane
• 14:38   RE: [HACKERS] GPL vs BSD licencing - a new twist Peter Mount
• 14:56   [GENERAL] Neverending query on 6.5.0 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 15:12   Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 15:57   Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] distinct. Is this the correct behaviour? Bruce Momjian
• 16:43   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble?] Brook Milligan
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Christoph Hoegl
• 18:19   pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client connection Oleg Bartunov
• 18:38   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Tom Lane
• 21:49   Re: [HACKERS] pq_recvbuf: unexpected EOF on client connection Tom Lane

22 October 1999

• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Vadim Mikheev
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Tom Lane
• 03:14   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Bruce Momjian
• 03:55   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Vadim Mikheev
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Vadim Mikheev
• 04:25   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Bruce Momjian
• 04:53   Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL? Vadim Mikheev
• 05:06   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Tom Lane
• 05:56   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Vadim Mikheev
• 06:01   Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL? Bruce Momjian
• 06:13   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Matthew N. Dodd
• 06:48   RE: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Ansley, Michael
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] Readline use in trouble? Milan Zamazal
• 11:48   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL? Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 14:22   Re: [HACKERS] Planning final assault on query length limits Tom Lane
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Tom Lane
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Brian E Gallew
• 15:03   Current sources fail if two 'serial' columns in one table Tom Lane
• 15:21   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Tom Lane
• 16:14   Re: [HACKERS] GPL vs BSD licencing - a new twist Peter Mount
• 16:16   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: Planning final assault on query length limits Michael Meskes
• 19:14   postgres inode q's Bryan Ingram
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] postgres inode q's wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] postgres inode q's Bryan Ingram
• 23:13   RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) Tim Holloway
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] New psql startup banner Peter Eisentraut
• 23:37   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain

23 October 1999

• 00:16   Re: [HACKERS] postgres inode q's Tom Lane
• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] New psql startup banner Bruce Momjian
• 00:41   RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:47   Path-length follies Tom Lane
• 11:45   GPL vs BSD vs SCSL Oleg Broytmann
• 16:26   Re: [HACKERS] postgres inode q's Bernard Frankpitt
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) Tom Lane
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 17:35   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 17:41   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) Aaron J. Seigo
• 18:27   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) The Hermit Hacker
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Bruce Momjian
• 19:15   RE: [HACKERS] New psql startup banner Ansley, Michael
• 19:32   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging Stephen Kogge
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Tom Lane
• 22:10   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Tom Lane
• 22:49   System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations) Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:53   Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Tom Lane

24 October 1999

• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) Tim Holloway
• 01:00   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage) Tim Holloway
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) Tom Lane
• 16:13   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:21   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage) Tom Lane
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (long message) Tim Holloway
• 17:29   Logging - events supported Tim Holloway
• 18:50   mv backend/port ../../ Peter Eisentraut
• 18:50   Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Peter Eisentraut
• 19:45   Catalog version numbering added (committers READ THIS) Tom Lane
• 20:08   Re: [HACKERS] Catalog version numbering added (committers READ THIS) Hannu Krosing
• 20:38   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - events supported Massimo Dal Zotto
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Mike Mascari
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - events supported Tim Holloway

25 October 1999

• 00:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Byron Nikolaidis
• 02:32   Status report: long-query changes Tom Lane
• 02:48   Book on web site Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Mike Mascari
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Mike Mascari
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Tom Lane
• 07:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Peter Eisentraut
• 12:41    Nguyen, Thuan X
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Tom Lane
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Mike Mascari
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging Peter Eisentraut
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging Aaron J. Seigo
• 22:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Byron Nikolaidis
• 23:08   Logging - pg_options format change? Tim Holloway

26 October 1999

• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging The Hermit Hacker
• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL? Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:22   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - events supported Ben Bennett
• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Postgres INSERTs much slower than MySQL? Vadim Mikheev
• 02:41   RE: mv backend/port ../../ Stéphane FILLON
• 02:57   Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Bruce Momjian
• 02:59   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocks is an amazing time sink in huge relations) Bruce Momjian
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] mv backend/port ../../ Bruce Momjian
• 03:24   RE: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis an amazing time sink in huge relations) Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Bruce Momjian
• 03:50   Re: [HACKERS] Catalog version numbering added (committers READ THIS) Bruce Momjian
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Bruce Momjian
• 04:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Bruce Momjian
• 04:14   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis an amazing time sink in huge relations) Bruce Momjian
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Bruce Momjian
• 04:31   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage) Bruce Momjian
• 05:17   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - pg_options format change? Tom Lane
• 06:18   Re: [ADMIN] Re: [HACKERS] RFC: Industrial-strength logging (longmessage) Hannu Krosing
• 07:15   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:11   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:58   Current source from CVS won't compile. Keith Parks
• 09:22   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:13   Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. Mike Mascari
• 10:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] COMMENT ON patch Peter Eisentraut
• 11:47   Re: [HACKERS] Neverending query on 6.5.2 over Solaris 2.5.1 Fernando Schapachnik
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Tom Lane
• 13:18   what the hell telnet is saad
• 13:32   Error: shmget failed Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Tom Lane
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] Error: shmget failed Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. Bruce Momjian
• 15:33   Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - pg_options format change? Bruce Momjian
• 15:40   psql Week 4 Peter Eisentraut
• 16:16   Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. Mike Mascari
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Error: shmget failed Bruce Momjian
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Bruce Momjian
• 16:33   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Bruce Momjian
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] Current source from CVS won't compile. Bruce Momjian
• 22:24   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - pg_options format change? Tim Holloway
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] Logging - pg_options format change? Tim Holloway
• 23:50   RE: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Hiroshi Inoue

27 October 1999

• 00:26   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Bruce Momjian
• 08:43   RE: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:51   Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef() Zakkr
• 10:04   Syntax error in psqlHelp.h Keith Parks
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] Error: shmget failed - SOLVED! Roberto Joao Lopes Garcia
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [ADMIN] Logging - events supported Herouth Maoz
• 15:10   psql Week 4.142857 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:31   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax error in psqlHelp.h Bruce Momjian
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:26   text datatype and tuple size limits. Brian Hirt
• 19:44   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax error in psqlHelp.h Keith Parks
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] Syntax error in psqlHelp.h Bruce Momjian
• 20:04   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Bruce Momjian
• 21:02   6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   RE: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:31   Re: System indexes are never unique indexes( was RE: [HACKERS] mdnblocksis Bruce Momjian

28 October 1999

• 00:07   PostgreSQL book translation Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Bruce Momjian
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL book translation Bruce Momjian
• 04:44   BLOB fields / JDBC Troy Griffitts
• 06:44   BLOB fields / JDBC Troy Griffitts
• 06:52   RE: [HACKERS] BLOB fields / JDBC Peter Mount
• 08:27   Re: Linux/Postgres 6.5 problems using jdbc w/jdk1.2 ednut
• 08:27   Re: Linux/Postgres 6.5 problems using jdbc w/jdk1.2 ednut
• 09:18   Re: [HACKERS] text datatype and tuple size limits. Peter Eisentraut
• 11:59   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Bruce Momjian
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Peter Eisentraut
• 18:54   Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Oliver Elphick
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Brian Ristuccia
• 21:59   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Tom Lane
• 23:28   Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Bruce Momjian

29 October 1999

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL book translation Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:48   Re: 6.5.3 The Hermit Hacker
• 01:44   Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Brian E Gallew
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Tom Lane
• 03:52   Re: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it already knows (fwd) Brian E Gallew
• 08:35   AW: [HACKERS] Bug#48582: psql spends hours computing results it a lready knows (fwd) Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5
• 08:37   view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef()) Zakkr
• 09:42   pgbash-1.2.1 released SAKAIDA
• 12:04   Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef()) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef()) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:49   Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef()) Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy (was: Bug(?) in pg_get_ruledef()) Tom Lane
• 20:29   Serial and NULL values Bruce Momjian
• 21:02   MATLAB PostgreSQL interface G. Anthony Reina
• 21:19   Re: [HACKERS] MATLAB PostgreSQL interface Bruce Momjian
• 22:46   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values Tom Lane
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values Bruce Momjian

30 October 1999

• 00:28   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values Brian Hirt
• 01:29   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values Tom Lane
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] postgres inode q's Theo Kramer
• 12:46   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:41   missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots Bruce Momjian
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
• 19:43   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 19:53   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:56   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:59   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots Vince Vielhaber
• 20:23   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Hannu Krosing
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Hannu Krosing
• 21:02   pgaccess for 6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
• 21:19   pg_dump, and strings Ansley, Michael
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:49   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Hannu Krosing
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess for 6.5.3 Lamar Owen
• 22:01   Performance glitch in GetCurrentAbsoluteTime() Tom Lane
• 22:34   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, and strings Tom Lane
• 22:44   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots Vince Vielhaber
• 23:46   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain

31 October 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 00:08   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 00:32   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshotsu Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] missing mugshots Bruce Momjian
• 01:18   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) frankpit@pop.dn.net
• 01:38   Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 04:56   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess for 6.5.3 Tom Lane
• 08:48   subscribe Mario Simeone
• 10:51   pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
• 10:52   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess for 6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
• 11:17   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values Bruce Momjian
• 11:20   Re: [HACKERS] Serial and NULL values Bruce Momjian
• 12:43   Patch - Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 15:01   Re: Patch - Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy Tom Lane
• 17:34   Trigger aborted on error Andrij Korud
• 18:30   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen
• 18:32   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
• 18:35   pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
• 18:47   pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
• 18:48   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen
• 19:34   exploit update. gov-boi
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] Trigger aborted on error wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:47   Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen
• 21:07   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump, and strings Peter Eisentraut