Home > mailing lists

Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 November 1999

01:05 Backend crashes (6.5.2 linux) Michael Simms
03:44 Re: [HACKERS] Backend crashes (6.5.2 linux) Tom Lane
03:55 Re: [HACKERS] Backend crashes (6.5.2 linux) Bruce Momjian
04:18 Datestyle Bruce Momjian
04:20 DateStyle Bruce Momjian
04:35 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] Backend crashes (6.5.2 linux) Vadim Mikheev
05:04 Re: [HACKERS] Trigger aborted on error Andrij Korud
05:10 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
05:23 Log on separate disk? Tatsuo Ishii
05:53 Getting oid of just inserted record Andrij Korud
07:25 Re: Patch - Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy Karel Zak - Zakkr
09:55 Re: [HACKERS] Trigger aborted on error D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
12:54 Re: Patch - Re: [HACKERS] view vs. inheritance hierarchy Tom Lane
13:10 Whos idea was this Andrij Korud
13:43 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
13:57 file descriptors leak? Gene Sokolov
14:54 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
15:11 Get OID of just inserted record Andrij Korud
15:17 Re: [HACKERS] Whos idea was this Craig Spannring
15:20 Re: [HACKERS] Whos idea was this Andrij Korud
15:52 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Karel Zak - Zakkr
16:02 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
16:34 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
17:08 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Aaron J. Seigo
17:14 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
17:42 using indices in ORDER BY ... DESC Oleg Bartunov
18:16 change in name of perl? Brook Milligan
19:18 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Tom Lane
20:04 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
20:20 Backend terminated abnormally nicks.emails
20:29 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Lamar Owen
20:43 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
20:47 Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Peter Eisentraut
20:49 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
21:09 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
21:09 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Bruce Momjian
21:17 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Tom Lane
21:30 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen
22:13 Re: [HACKERS] Backend crashes (6.5.2 linux) Michael Simms
22:13 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
22:33 RE: [HACKERS] using indices in ORDER BY ... DESC Hiroshi Inoue
23:07 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Lamar Owen
23:13 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
23:17 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Lamar Owen
23:22 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen

2 November 1999

00:03 Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
00:25 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Mike Mascari
00:38 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Don Baccus
00:38 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Bruce Momjian
01:02 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
01:08 Re: [HACKERS] Backend crashes (6.5.2 linux) Tom Lane
01:17 Re: [HACKERS] Function-manager redesign: second draft (long) Tom Lane
01:20 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Tom Lane
01:40 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
01:47 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Lamar Owen
01:50 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Lamar Owen
02:01 Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES Lamar Owen
02:06 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Tom Lane
02:06 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
02:07 6.5.3 is ready Bruce Momjian
02:08 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
02:34 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Lamar Owen
02:46 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Bruce Momjian
03:10 unsubscribe Victoria W.
03:21 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Tom Lane
03:32 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
03:45 Re: [HACKERS] Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES Tom Lane
05:16 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Andrij Korud
06:05 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Hannu Krosing
07:05 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Gene Sokolov
07:05 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Gene Sokolov
07:13 inheritance of functions Andrzej Mazurkiewicz
07:14 A bug in NOT IN (SELECT ... Hannu Krosing
07:41 Re: [HACKERS] Trigger aborted on error Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
07:51 AW: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
09:25 Re: [HACKERS] Backend terminated abnormally Vince Vielhaber
13:12 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Brook Milligan
13:14 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Bruce Momjian
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Tom Lane
13:25 Re: AW: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
14:05 Re: [HACKERS] Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES Lamar Owen
14:10 AW: AW: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
14:39 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.3 is ready The Hermit Hacker
14:45 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.3 is ready Bruce Momjian
14:45 Re: [HACKERS] change in name of perl? Lamar Owen
15:04 RE: [HACKERS] 6.5.3 is ready Peter Mount
16:15 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Oleg Bartunov
16:18 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Aaron J. Seigo
16:28 Re: [HACKERS] 6.5.3 is ready Lamar Owen
16:49 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Peter Eisentraut
16:51 Fwd: Re: fs/etx2/file.c question from postgres developers... Aaron J. Seigo
17:01 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Bruce Momjian
17:16 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Tom Lane
17:23 Re: [HACKERS] file descriptors leak? Tom Lane
17:43 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Aaron J. Seigo
19:36 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Peter Eisentraut
20:18 Re: PostgreSQL vs Mysql comparison Dimitri
21:24 selecting a certain number of rows Tyson Oswald
23:19 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

3 November 1999

01:05 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
02:08 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Aaron J. Seigo
04:18 RE: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Ansley, Michael
10:11 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
10:24 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
11:44 unsubcribe Akmal Hasan
12:30 Installing Postgresql Stiaan
13:38 Re: incomplete info from original message Lamar Owen
16:31 Re: [HACKERS] Get OID of just inserted record Aaron J. Seigo
16:33 [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Ed Loehr
16:44 [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Ed Loehr
17:35 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Aaron J. Seigo
18:21 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Ed Loehr
19:38 your commnts nicks.emails
20:18 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Aaron J. Seigo
21:43 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Tom Lane
22:14 VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT Brian Hirt
22:53 Re: [HACKERS] VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT Oliver Elphick
23:00 Re: [HACKERS] VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT Tom Lane
23:50 PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... The Hermit Hacker

4 November 1999

00:06 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Tatsuo Ishii
00:21 RE: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Vince Vielhaber
00:27 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Brian Hirt
00:33 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Bruce Momjian
01:27 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:41 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Tatsuo Ishii
01:45 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Bruce Momjian
01:46 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Bruce Momjian
02:03 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Tatsuo Ishii
02:07 Re: [HACKERS] VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
02:09 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... The Hermit Hacker
02:19 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... The Hermit Hacker
02:42 Re: [HACKERS] VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT Tom Lane
03:17 Re: [HACKERS] VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT Bruce Momjian
04:01 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Aaron J. Seigo
04:10 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Tatsuo Ishii
04:54 Re: Installing Postgresql hitchc@vcmr-19.rcs.rpi.edu (Collin W. Hitchcock)
06:30 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
07:04 RE: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Ansley, Michael
07:10 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tatsuo Ishii
07:14 RE: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Ansley, Michael
07:18 RE: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Ansley, Michael
08:48 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Vince Vielhaber
10:26 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Pedro J. Lobo
11:24 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Peter Eisentraut
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Bruce Momjian
13:11 Inheritance of functions Andrzej Mazurkiewicz
13:36 Re: Performance glitch in GetCurrentAbsoluteTime() Thomas Lockhart
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Thomas Lockhart
13:51 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] pgaccess 0.98 Bruce Momjian
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Pedro J. Lobo
14:09 Re: [HACKERS] Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES Thomas Lockhart
14:23 packaging of 6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
14:29 RE: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Ansley, Michael
14:33 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... The Hermit Hacker
14:33 Re: Performance glitch in GetCurrentAbsoluteTime() Tom Lane
14:35 Re: [HACKERS] VIEWS, DISTINCT and COUNT Thomas Lockhart
14:38 Re: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Ed Loehr
14:44 Re: Performance glitch in GetCurrentAbsoluteTime() Thomas Lockhart
16:51 Re: packaging of 6.5.3 The Hermit Hacker
16:54 Re: packaging of 6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
17:50 Re: packaging of 6.5.3 The Hermit Hacker
18:42 RE: [HACKERS] getting new serial value of serial insert Aaron J. Seigo
18:44 Re: packaging of 6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
19:56 Re: [HACKERS] psql Week 4.142857 Bruce Momjian
20:23 New version of psql Bruce Momjian
20:37 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Michael Simms
20:47 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
21:06 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
21:42 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Don Baccus
22:43 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
22:58 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Mike Mascari
23:00 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
23:38 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
23:38 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Ryan Kirkpatrick

5 November 1999

00:01 Re: Installing Postgresql les@Mars.mcs.net (Leslie Mikesell)
00:18 Fwd: test problem in english now ( excuse me ! ) suite regress test Lamar Owen
00:27 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Lamar Owen
01:44 ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Kristofer Munn
02:03 xid type Michael Robinson
03:42 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Tom Lane
04:41 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Kristofer Munn
06:02 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Tom Lane
09:23 Get Relational access without sacrificing Reliability Promotions
09:25 Encoding in UDF's Andrij Korud
10:56 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
11:35 Re: [HACKERS] Encoding in UDF's Oleg Broytmann
13:51 Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing? Ross J. Reedstrom
14:34 Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing? Lamar Owen
14:38 Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing? Bruce Momjian
14:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing? Tom Lane

6 November 1999

00:07 PostgreSQL 6.5.3 STABLE RPMs released. Lamar Owen
02:55 Re: [HACKERS] Encoding in UDF's Tatsuo Ishii
04:07 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Thomas Lockhart
10:57 Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Peter Eisentraut
13:38 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Peter Eisentraut
13:41 Re: New version of psql Peter Eisentraut
13:42 Re: New version of psql Peter Eisentraut
13:43 Re: New version of psql Peter Eisentraut
13:44 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Peter Eisentraut
13:53 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Ryan Kirkpatrick
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Massimo Dal Zotto
14:47 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
14:48 Re: New version of psql Bruce Momjian
14:51 Re: New version of psql Bruce Momjian
14:54 Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql Bruce Momjian
14:55 Re: New version of psql Bruce Momjian
14:58 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Bruce Momjian
15:14 Problem with CVS Jeroen van Vianen
15:14 Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Tom Lane
15:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: New version of psql Tom Lane
16:10 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Tom Lane
17:49 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Bruce Momjian
18:10 Arrays broken on temp tables Kristofer Munn
18:38 New psql compile problem. Keith Parks
18:42 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Tom Lane
18:47 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Bruce Momjian
18:51 Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: infinite recursion in proc_exit Bruce Momjian
18:52 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
19:14 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Thomas Lockhart
19:14 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
19:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing? Charles Tassell
19:35 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
19:55 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
20:19 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Ryan Kirkpatrick
20:50 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
21:01 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Keith Parks
23:11 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Tom Lane

7 November 1999

01:16 PostgreSQL 6.5.3 Linux/Alpha Update Ryan Kirkpatrick
02:47 Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ... Lamar Owen
04:20 pgsql quote bug, put in 6.5.4? Stephen Birch
08:40 Re: Installing Postgresql Gavin Clark
09:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] indexed regex select optimisation missing? Stuart Woolford
10:19 Re: [HACKERS] pgsql quote bug, put in 6.5.4? Bruce Momjian
10:55 RE: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Ansley, Michael
10:55 RE: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Ansley, Michael
10:58 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Keith Parks
11:03 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
12:18 What is nameout() for? Bruce Momjian
13:47 psql and 6.5.3 Damond Walker
14:52 New psql input mode problems Keith Parks
15:31 Re: [HACKERS] psql and 6.5.3 Bruce Momjian
15:56 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Bruce Momjian
16:10 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Keith Parks
16:55 IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Brian Hirt
16:57 Re: [HACKERS] psql and 6.5.3 Damond Walker
17:26 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Bruce Momjian
17:40 Re: [HACKERS] IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Brian Hirt
18:38 Re: [HACKERS] What is nameout() for? Mike Mascari
18:49 Re: [HACKERS] What is nameout() for? Bruce Momjian
18:49 Re: [HACKERS] What is nameout() for? Don Baccus
21:04 New NameStr() macro, RelationGetRelationName fixes Bruce Momjian
21:30 Re: [HACKERS] psql and 6.5.3 Thomas Lockhart
21:53 more] indexed regex select optimisations? Stuart Woolford

8 November 1999

04:06 new Psql \pset border Bruce Momjian
06:30 listing tables Matt M.
09:50 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Peter Eisentraut
10:02 Re: [HACKERS] new Psql \pset border Peter Eisentraut
10:13 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Peter Eisentraut
12:37 Backend build fails in current Peter Eisentraut
13:58 Re: [HACKERS] new Psql \pset border Bruce Momjian
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Bruce Momjian
16:07 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Keith Parks
19:00 Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Peter Eisentraut
19:02 Re: [HACKERS] new Psql \pset border Bruce Momjian
19:02 Re: [HACKERS] new Psql \pset border Bruce Momjian
19:06 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Peter Eisentraut
19:16 Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Peter Eisentraut
19:19 Re: [HACKERS] New NameStr() macro, RelationGetRelationName fixes Peter Eisentraut
19:25 Re: [HACKERS] New psql input mode problems Bruce Momjian
20:01 AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
23:36 CORBA STATUS Mark Proctor

9 November 1999

00:32 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Bruce Momjian
05:49 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
06:43 RE: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Peter Mount
07:19 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Peter Eisentraut
11:16 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Brian E Gallew
12:13 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS The Hermit Hacker
12:45 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Brian E Gallew
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
13:22 RE: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Horak Daniel
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Goran Thyni
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Adriaan Joubert
15:57 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Dmitry Samersoff
16:26 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Oleg Broytmann
19:33 RE: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Peter Mount
19:41 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS The Hermit Hacker
22:25 Indent Peter Eisentraut
23:22 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Bruce Momjian
23:25 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Mike Mascari
23:57 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Bruce Momjian

10 November 1999

00:55 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
01:03 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Thomas Lockhart
02:02 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Bruce Momjian
02:09 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS The Hermit Hacker
02:13 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Thomas Lockhart
02:19 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
02:42 6.5.3 RPMs are on ftp site Thomas Lockhart
03:29 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Bruce Momjian
05:22 RE: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Ansley, Michael
06:16 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Theo Kramer
09:00 Re: [HACKERS] Indent D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
09:01 Re: 6.5.3 RPMs are on ftp site Vince Vielhaber
09:23 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Vince Vielhaber
10:18 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Michael Robinson
12:18 Re: 6.5.3 RPMs are on ftp site Lamar Owen
12:29 Re: 6.5.3 RPMs are on ftp site Vince Vielhaber
12:58 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS The Hermit Hacker
12:59 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS The Hermit Hacker
13:37 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
13:43 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Oliver Elphick
14:08 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Lamar Owen
15:17 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
15:44 Locking record behaviour when using transaction -BEGIN/END Juan Vergara
16:07 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Bernard Frankpitt
18:48 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Goran Thyni
21:38 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Bruce Stephens
22:17 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Frederick Cheeseborough

11 November 1999

00:04 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Tom Lane
00:28 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
00:32 Re: [HACKERS] New psql compile problem. Tom Lane
00:32 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Bruce Momjian
00:35 Re: [HACKERS] Path-length follies Tom Lane
00:39 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
00:42 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Tom Lane
00:58 Re: [HACKERS] IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Tom Lane
01:15 Re: [HACKERS] What is nameout() for? Tom Lane
02:32 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
02:34 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
03:06 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
03:32 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
04:19 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Tom Lane
08:07 Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Vadim Mikheev
13:29 Re: [INTERFACES] Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Thomas Lockhart
13:38 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Peter Eisentraut
13:46 PostgreSQL and Zope Oleg Broytmann
13:49 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Thomas Lockhart
14:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Tom Lane
16:22 psql and \p\g Bruce Momjian
16:28 failure of \e in psql Bruce Momjian
17:09 compression in LO and other fields Karel Zak - Zakkr
17:40 Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
17:52 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Theo Kramer
18:34 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query The Hermit Hacker
18:42 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Hannu Krosing
18:49 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
18:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Frank Cusack
19:09 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
19:09 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tom Lane
19:18 syncing, replicating & crash recovery Q's Bryan Ingram
19:29 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Peter Eisentraut
19:32 Re: psql and \p\g Peter Eisentraut
19:33 Re: failure of \e in psql Peter Eisentraut
19:37 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Tom Lane
19:52 Re: failure of \e in psql Bruce Momjian
19:52 Re: psql and \p\g Bruce Momjian
19:57 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Tom Lane
20:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: psql and \p\g Tom Lane
21:21 Re: [HACKERS] Indent Don Baccus
21:45 new version 6.5.3 Frans Van Elsacker
21:50 Frans Van Elsacker
21:53 subscribe Frans Van Elsacker
22:05 union problem version 6.5.3 Frans Van Elsacker

12 November 1999

00:01 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tatsuo Ishii
01:41 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:55 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Bruce Momjian
03:07 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
03:52 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Vadim Mikheev
04:08 Re: failure of \e in psql Bruce Momjian
04:15 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tom Lane
04:47 Re: AWL: Re: tm1 Thomas Lockhart
05:39 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Thomas Lockhart
06:03 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
06:12 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
07:33 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Karel Zak - Zakkr
07:49 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Brian Hirt
07:52 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Karel Zak - Zakkr
08:04 Re: psql and \p\g Peter Eisentraut
08:11 Re: failure of \e in psql Peter Eisentraut
09:17 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Peter Eisentraut
10:01 AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] users in Postgresql Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
11:45 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tatsuo Ishii
12:08 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:46 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tom Lane
12:46 Re: internationalizing and etc.. Thomas Lockhart
12:48 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Thomas Lockhart
12:51 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields The Hermit Hacker
12:59 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:00 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Tom Lane
13:06 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:14 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tom Lane
13:16 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Philip Warner
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Karel Zak - Zakkr
13:36 Re: [HACKERS] union problem version 6.5.3 Tom Lane
13:50 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Ross J. Reedstrom
14:22 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tom Lane
14:32 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Karel Zak - Zakkr
14:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: AWL: Re: tm1 Bruce Momjian
14:57 Re: psql and \p\g Bruce Momjian
15:02 Re: failure of \e in psql Bruce Momjian
15:15 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Bruce Momjian
15:35 www.hack.co.za - exploit archives updates - 0day gov-boi
16:03 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Brian Hirt
16:45 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Don Baccus
17:33 AW: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
19:20 how to handle struct within EXEC SQL DECLARE SECTION? bayard kohlhepp
19:58 how should you define a struct within EXEC SQL section? bayard kohlhepp
20:04 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Hannu Krosing
20:12 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Hannu Krosing
21:28 Re: [HACKERS] union problem version 6.5.3 Frans Van Elsacker
22:00 Re: [HACKERS] union problem version 6.5.3 Tom Lane
22:48 RFC: create/alter user extension Peter Eisentraut
23:53 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

13 November 1999

00:02 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields The Hermit Hacker
00:03 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields The Hermit Hacker
00:34 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:01 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:48 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields Tom Lane
02:11 Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension Tom Lane
02:33 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Tom Lane
03:17 Thread-safe queueing? Tim Holloway
05:54 Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current Tom Lane
07:54 Re: [HACKERS] Slow - grindingly slow - query Theo Kramer
11:37 Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current Peter Eisentraut
11:38 Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension Peter Eisentraut
12:51 Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current Tom Lane
12:58 Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension Tom Lane
13:16 Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe queueing? Tom Lane
13:42 Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current Tom Lane
14:34 Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current Bruce Momjian
14:37 Failure to show descriptions in \df command Bruce Momjian
15:16 Re: Failure to show descriptions in \df command Peter Eisentraut
15:16 Re: [HACKERS] translate function (BUG?) Keith Parks
16:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Failure to show descriptions in \df command Bruce Momjian
19:15 My bits moved right off the end of the world... Theo Kramer
19:26 Re: [HACKERS] My bits moved right off the end of the world... Peter Eisentraut
20:21 Re: [HACKERS] My bits moved right off the end of the world... Bruce Momjian
20:22 Status of sql_help.h Tom Lane
20:24 Compression in LO and other fields Cary O'Brien
23:18 Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe queueing? Tim Holloway

14 November 1999

00:30 Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe queueing? Tom Lane
01:13 Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe queueing? Bruce Momjian
01:50 Re: [HACKERS] Thread-safe queueing? Tom Lane
04:17 Re: [HACKERS] My bits moved right off the end of the world... Theo Kramer
06:30 pg_dump - rebuilding indexes Brian Hirt
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] My bits moved right off the end of the world... Bruce Momjian
14:20 Re: [HACKERS] My bits moved right off the end of the world... Bruce Momjian
15:16 Autocount link2
15:26 Re: [HACKERS] My bits moved right off the end of the world... Bruce Momjian
16:48 Re: [HACKERS] union problem version 6.5.3 Tom Lane
17:14 Help with SPI and oids Adriaan Joubert
17:24 Postmaster dies with FATAL 1: ReleaseLruFile: No opened files - no one can be closed Mike Mascari
18:40 problem with MB ? 6.5.3 under freebsd-elf Oleg Bartunov
21:13 Looks like hell, but ... The Hermit Hacker
21:24 Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with FATAL 1: ReleaseLruFile: No opened files - no one can be closed Tom Lane
21:38 elog() executed by postmaster Tom Lane
22:55 Re: [HACKERS] elog() executed by postmaster Bruce Momjian

15 November 1999

15:13 Re: [HACKERS] Looks like hell, but ... Lamar Owen
15:51 Re: [HACKERS] Looks like hell, but ... The Hermit Hacker
16:16 Re: [HACKERS] Looks like hell, but ... Brian Hirt
17:10 6.5.1 -vs- null values for an int8 Robert Forsman
17:27 Re: [HACKERS] Looks like hell, but ... The Hermit Hacker
17:45 Constantino Martins
20:56 Re: [HACKERS] Status of sql_help.h Peter Eisentraut
21:22 Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with FATAL 1: ReleaseLruFile: No opened files - no one can be closed Mike Mascari
21:31 shell accounts that offer postgresql? Speedy Fast
23:03 Re: [HACKERS] Status of sql_help.h Tom Lane
23:26 Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster dies with FATAL 1: ReleaseLruFile: No opened files - no one can be closed Tom Lane

16 November 1999

00:45 Re: Postgresql Docs.... Thomas Lockhart
01:08 RE: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Vince Vielhaber
02:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Tom Lane
02:40 Unique indexes on system tables Bruce Momjian
03:23 RE: Unique indexes on system tables Hiroshi Inoue
06:44 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields inoue
06:48 Re: [HACKERS] compression in LO and other fields inoue
14:29 replication Aaron J. Seigo
21:51 Slow access Tyson Oswald

17 November 1999

03:13 Re: PostgreSQL install Ross J. Reedstrom
03:27 Re: PostgreSQL install Christopher Petrilli
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: PostgreSQL install Tom Lane
08:16 regression tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
09:07 select MIN/MAX when no row selected Ricardo Coelho
09:08 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Peter Eisentraut
09:12 Re: [HACKERS] RE: Unique indexes on system tables Peter Eisentraut
09:22 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Peter Eisentraut
09:55 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:48 Re: [HACKERS] RE: Unique indexes on system tables wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
10:57 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
11:34 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Peter Eisentraut
13:08 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Lamar Owen
14:01 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
14:06 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
14:26 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Aaron J. Seigo
14:54 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Tom Lane
15:56 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
16:03 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Evan Simpson
16:51 FW: How to select the millisecond/microsecond parts of the dateti me column Narayanan, Kannan
17:07 FW: Query Vince Vielhaber
17:36 Re: [HACKERS] FW: Query wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:46 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
18:17 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
18:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Lamar Owen
18:57 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
20:47 LZ compressing data type wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
21:51 Re: [HACKERS] regression tests Bruce Momjian
21:53 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type Michael Simms
22:29 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
22:53 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs.... Henry B. Hotz

18 November 1999

00:32 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:26 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type Philip Warner
02:30 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type Tom Lane
02:50 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type Philip Warner
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type Tom Lane
08:10 RE: [HACKERS] FW: Query Ansley, Michael
10:22 Re: [HACKERS] LZ compressing data type wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
12:06 rules use lztext - initdb required wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:19 Change your own password Ricardo Coelho
13:21 Re: [HACKERS] rules use lztext - initdb required Brook Milligan
19:21 Createdb problem report Oliver Elphick
19:48 Re: [HACKERS] Createdb problem report Bruce Momjian
20:26 psql & regress tests Peter Eisentraut
21:01 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Bruce Momjian
21:14 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Ross J. Reedstrom
21:37 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Bruce Momjian
21:58 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
22:19 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Tom Lane
22:31 pg version date file Bruce Momjian
23:04 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Bruce Momjian
23:06 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
23:11 Hash Join is very slooow in some cases Hiroshi Inoue
23:13 Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
23:59 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Tom Lane

19 November 1999

00:33 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:04 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Bruce Momjian
01:26 Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file Tom Lane
01:27 Primary key requires SERIAL Bruce Momjian
01:29 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Tom Lane
01:34 Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file Bruce Momjian
01:44 7.0 status request Bruce Momjian
01:47 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Tom Lane
01:52 Re: [HACKERS] Hash Join is very slooow in some cases Tom Lane
02:08 Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file Tom Lane
02:16 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Tom Lane
02:17 Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file Bruce Momjian
02:17 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
02:20 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Bruce Momjian
02:35 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
02:37 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Bruce Momjian
02:47 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Don Baccus
02:47 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Don Baccus
02:49 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Tom Lane
02:59 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Bruce Momjian
03:16 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Aaron J. Seigo
03:41 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Tom Lane
03:51 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Tom Lane
04:34 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Thomas Lockhart
04:41 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Thomas Lockhart
04:50 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Tom Lane
05:04 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Tom Lane
08:21 Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Oliver Elphick
09:39 pg_dump bug jose soares
10:31 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Bruce Momjian
10:38 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bugu Bruce Momjian
10:41 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
12:46 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug Oleg Bartunov
12:57 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:06 Re: [BUGS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Oleg Bartunov
13:08 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug Tom Lane
13:17 Curiously confused query parser. Gene Sokolov
13:25 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug Thomas Lockhart
13:33 Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL Thomas Lockhart
13:37 Re: [HACKERS] Curiously confused query parser. Tom Lane
13:40 Mandrake Postgres RPMs Thomas Lockhart
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] Mandrake Postgres RPMs J. Roeleveld
14:04 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug Bruce Momjian
15:15 Re: Mandrake Postgres RPMs Lamar Owen
15:28 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Lamar Owen
16:18 LinuxPlanet RDBMS comparison article series. Lamar Owen
17:38 New regression driver wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
17:51 All forked up Tim Holloway
18:04 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
18:14 Re: [HACKERS] Curiously confused query parser. wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
19:42 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Brian Hirt
19:49 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Bruce Momjian
19:57 RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Vince Vielhaber
20:16 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Tom Lane
20:26 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
20:35 Re: [HACKERS] All forked up Tom Lane
20:40 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Bruce Momjian
20:48 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Mike Mascari
22:22 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
23:33 Re: [HACKERS] Createdb problem report Peter Eisentraut
23:33 create/alter user extension syntax Peter Eisentraut

20 November 1999

01:08 Re: [HACKERS] create/alter user extension syntax Thomas Lockhart
01:20 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Thomas Lockhart
02:24 7.0 status request Bruce Momjian
10:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Tatsuo Ishii
11:28 [q] can I simply remove pg_log file? C.S.Park
14:05 Bulk update of large database Martin Weinberg
15:26 C++ and SPI Andrij Korud
15:33 Re: [HACKERS] Bulk update of large database Tom Lane
18:03 Timothy
19:45 Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump bug Tom Lane
20:00 Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver Tom Lane
22:03 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Peter Eisentraut
22:04 Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Peter Eisentraut
22:04 RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Peter Eisentraut
22:04 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Peter Eisentraut
22:11 Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver Tom Lane
23:01 Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver Bruce Momjian
23:04 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian

21 November 1999

00:13 Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver Tom Lane
00:39 Advogato Goran Thyni
17:48 locking needed for parsing & planning Tom Lane
21:01 Reproducible vacuum complaint! Tom Lane
22:26 RE: [HACKERS] Reproducible vacuum complaint! Hiroshi Inoue

22 November 1999

00:38 RE: [HACKERS] New regression driver Hiroshi Inoue
00:50 Re: [HACKERS] New regression driver Bruce Momjian
02:12 Re: [HACKERS] Reproducible vacuum complaint! Tom Lane
03:19 Re: [HACKERS] Reproducible vacuum complaint! Vadim Mikheev
04:40 cache question Bruce Momjian
05:01 Re: [HACKERS] cache question Bruce Momjian
05:04 Re: [HACKERS] cache question Tom Lane
13:20 Re: [HACKERS] cache question Bruce Momjian
14:01 TODO updates Tom Lane
14:07 AW: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
14:28 AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
14:40 Re: postgres RPM build on Suse linux 6.2 Lamar Owen
15:07 AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
15:48 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
15:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: postgres RPM build on Suse linux 6.2 Bruce Momjian
16:00 System cache index cleanup Bruce Momjian
16:04 Re: TODO updates Bruce Momjian
16:38 Re: [HACKERS] Re: postgres RPM build on Suse linux 6.2 Lamar Owen
17:11 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Tom Lane
17:16 Re: [HACKERS] Re: postgres RPM build on Suse linux 6.2 Tom Lane
18:33 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
19:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: postgres RPM build on Suse linux 6.2 Vince Vielhaber
19:35 Re: [HACKERS] Re: postgres RPM build on Suse linux 6.2 Lamar Owen
20:05 RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Hiroshi Inoue
23:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates The Hermit Hacker
23:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates Tom Lane

23 November 1999

00:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates The Hermit Hacker
00:54 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Vadim Mikheev
00:58 Mandrake RPMs (was RPM build on Suse linux 6.2) Thomas Lockhart
01:17 RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Hiroshi Inoue
01:25 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Vadim Mikheev
02:03 Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Bruce Momjian
02:14 RE: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request Hiroshi Inoue
02:34 Re: Mandrake RPMs (was RPM build on Suse linux 6.2) Lamar Owen
02:38 Re: [HACKERS] System cache index cleanup Tom Lane
02:52 Re: [HACKERS] System cache index cleanup Bruce Momjian
03:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates Tom Lane
04:42 Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane
05:12 VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack Tom Lane
06:13 Float/Numeric? Michael Meskes
06:59 AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
07:18 Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert SAKAIDA Masaaki
07:20 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue
07:41 RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Hiroshi Inoue
08:32 SQL statements: begin and end Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
08:38 AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
10:01 Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Peter Eisentraut
12:20 Re: [HACKERS] Float/Numeric? Thomas Lockhart
12:28 Re: [DOCS] RE: file name error (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
12:58 Re: [DOCS] RE: file name error (fwd) Vince Vielhaber
13:01 Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Tom Lane
13:17 Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Thomas Lockhart
13:26 Re: Mandrake RPMs (was RPM build on Suse linux 6.2) Thomas Lockhart
13:32 Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Don Baccus
13:38 Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Tom Lane
13:43 AW: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
14:16 Re: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Vince Vielhaber
14:41 AW: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
16:02 Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
16:04 A bug or a feature? Alessio Bragadini
16:05 Re: SQL statements: begin and end Bruce Momjian
17:13 AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
17:22 AW: [HACKERS] Re: SQL statements: begin and end Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
17:30 AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
17:57 RE: AW: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Vince Vielhaber
18:00 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
18:03 Fwd: [GENERAL] Problem with CREATE RULE ON DELETE (PostgreSQL only executes the first expression) J. Roeleveld
18:07 Re: Mandrake RPMs (was RPM build on Suse linux 6.2) Lamar Owen
19:20 RE: AW: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end Ansley, Michael
20:19 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack Keith Parks
22:56 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Peter Eisentraut
23:22 lztext.c Tatsuo Ishii
23:30 Cache on pg_statistics Bruce Momjian
23:33 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian

24 November 1999

00:35 Re: [HACKERS] lztext.c wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
00:45 Re: [HACKERS] A bug or a feature? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
01:18 From the LDP web site... Thomas Lockhart
01:53 Re: [HACKERS] lztext.c Tatsuo Ishii
02:58 RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Hiroshi Inoue
03:09 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Bruce Momjian
04:09 Re: [HACKERS] A bug or a feature? Tom Lane
04:12 pid file for postmaster? Tatsuo Ishii
04:18 Re: [HACKERS] Cache on pg_statistics Tom Lane
04:30 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Tom Lane
04:35 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tom Lane
04:39 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tatsuo Ishii
04:50 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tom Lane
05:11 Re: [HACKERS] lztext.c Oleg Bartunov
05:32 RE: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Hiroshi Inoue
07:24 AW: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert (; and : o perators) Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
14:53 Re: missing Tidscan.h Bruce Momjian
15:24 Development installation fails Peter Eisentraut
15:24 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] RE: file name error (fwd) Peter Eisentraut
16:30 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [DOCS] RE: file name error (fwd) Vince Vielhaber
17:40 Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Tom Lane
21:38 run_check problem Keith Parks
22:19 lztext and parser wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
22:25 Re: [HACKERS] Cache on pg_statistics Bruce Momjian
23:56 Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

25 November 1999

00:33 Re: [HACKERS] lztext.c wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem Tom Lane
04:05 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue
04:18 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane
06:27 Vacuum Grzegorz Przeździecki
10:40 Re: [HACKERS] lztext and parser Karel Zak - Zakkr
10:55 Re: [HACKERS] lztext and parser wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
11:09 Re: [PATCHES] ':' and ';' operators Peter Eisentraut
11:20 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tim Holloway
11:56 PgAccess - small bug? Karel Zak - Zakkr
13:18 Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Tom Lane
13:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ':' and ';' operators Tom Lane
14:00 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tom Lane
14:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ':' and ';' operators wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
14:33 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tim Holloway
16:51 substring extraction Karel Zak - Zakkr
17:13 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Michael Meskes
17:18 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Bruce Momjian
17:21 Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Bruce Momjian
17:22 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Bruce Momjian
17:37 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Hannu Krosing
17:58 [abhijitc@wipinfo.soft.net: A query...] Michael Meskes
18:16 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Dmitry Samersoff
19:53 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Tim Holloway
20:14 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] ':' and ';' operators mascarm@mascari.com
23:06 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue

26 November 1999

00:13 ... Tatsuo Ishii
02:04 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Bruce Momjian
02:12 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Bruce Momjian
02:41 Re: your mail Bruce Momjian
02:47 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue
03:10 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Bruce Momjian
03:34 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev
03:52 Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
03:57 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane
04:21 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue
04:39 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane
04:42 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev
04:44 Re: [HACKERS] pid file for postmaster? Michael Meskes
04:46 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev
04:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
04:57 Re: pg_ctl Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
05:02 Re: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Vadim Mikheev
05:12 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Adriaan Joubert
07:27 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari
07:38 AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
08:12 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
08:14 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari
08:30 AW: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transaction s Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
12:23 Re: [HACKERS] substring extraction jose soares
12:30 Re: [HACKERS] Vacuum Grzegorz Przeździecki
12:50 Re: [HACKERS] substring extraction Karel Zak - Zakkr
13:39 Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane
14:07 Re: Lamar Owen
14:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
15:49 Re: [PATCHES] A bag of psql goodiesu Bruce Momjian
16:17 Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem Keith Parks
16:58 Re: [HACKERS] run_check problem Bruce Momjian
17:24 Credit Kard 100$ Iradm
17:52 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari
18:10 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Lamar Owen
18:39 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari
19:54 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Lamar Owen
20:51 RE: [HACKERS] Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue
21:31 Re: [HACKERS] substring extraction wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

27 November 1999

00:05 Re: Tatsuo Ishii
00:09 Re: pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii
00:50 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Lamar Owen
03:04 Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane
04:43 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii
15:11 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane
16:26 Referential Integrety Stephen Birch
20:10 Bugfix RPM release available for immediate download Lamar Owen

28 November 1999

01:05 Re: Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane
13:09 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A bag of psql goodies Peter Eisentraut
13:10 Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Peter Eisentraut
14:00 AD:Family Reunion T Shirts & More hifiber7@compuserve.com
15:44 Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Tom Lane
17:44 [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Ed Loehr
17:51 UNION not allowed in sub-selects? Oliver Elphick
18:05 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tim Holloway
20:45 Re: [HACKERS] UNION not allowed in sub-selects? Tom Lane
21:31 Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Tom Lane
22:30 RE: [HACKERS] Re: Concurrent VACUUM: first results Hiroshi Inoue

29 November 1999

01:05 Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from [Joe Brenner ] (fwd) Vince Vielhaber
02:32 How to get info about deadlocks? Tom Lane
02:50 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack Tom Lane
03:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from [Joe Brenner ] (fwd) Tom Lane
03:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Concurrent VACUUM: first results Tom Lane
03:20 Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Ed Loehr
03:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Bruce Momjian
03:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
03:43 Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Tom Lane
03:46 Re: [HACKERS] Re: Tatsuo Ishii
04:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
04:05 Re: [HACKERS] How to get info about deadlocks? Bruce Momjian
04:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Mike Mascari
04:32 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
04:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
04:43 Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Ed Loehr
04:56 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
05:34 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
05:37 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
05:59 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
06:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
06:13 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
06:19 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Thomas Lockhart
07:41 Pro*C conversion S S Mani
10:05 Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert Peter Eisentraut
11:22 Re: [HACKERS] Referential Integrety wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
13:02 Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Peter Eisentraut
13:40 Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Oleg Bartunov
13:46 Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails Tom Lane
14:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Oleg Broytmann
14:21 Re: [HACKERS] Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
15:01 Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Lamar Owen
16:27 Re: [HACKERS] How to get info about deadlocks? Massimo Dal Zotto
17:15 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
17:17 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
17:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
17:18 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
17:32 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack Keith Parks
18:56 Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM as a denial-of-service attack The Hermit Hacker
20:25 Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch Bruce Momjian
20:30 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] new patches Bruce Momjian
20:30 Re: [HACKERS] destroydb doesn't close connection with client (httpd <-> pg) Bruce Momjian
20:31 Re: [HACKERS] having bug report Bruce Momjian
20:41 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Bruce Momjian
20:50 Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha Bruce Momjian
21:02 Re: [HACKERS] pg_upgrade may be mortally wounded Bruce Momjian
21:16 Re: [HACKERS] Bug Bruce Momjian
21:28 Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Bruce Momjian
22:00 Re: [HACKERS] How to get OID from INSERT in PL/PGSQL? Peter Eisentraut
22:01 Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Peter Eisentraut
22:32 Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments Bruce Momjian
22:35 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
22:35 Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian
22:58 Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha Uncle George
23:22 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii
23:36 Re: [DOCS] Re: [HACKERS] Outline for PostgreSQL book Bruce Momjian
23:48 Re: [HACKERS] How to get info about deadlocks? Tim Holloway
23:52 Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Bruce Momjian
23:53 Re: indexable and locale Bruce Momjian
23:53 Re: indexable and locale Bruce Momjian
23:54 Re: [HACKERS] indexable and locale Bruce Momjian

30 November 1999

00:03 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Bruce Momjian
00:10 Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch Tom Lane
00:12 Re: [HACKERS] destroydb doesn't close connection with client (httpd <-> pg) Tom Lane
00:14 Re: [HACKERS] Bizarre coding in _bt_binsrch Bruce Momjian
00:15 Re: [PATCHES] Re: [HACKERS] new patches Tom Lane
00:17 Re: [HACKERS] having bug report Tom Lane
00:22 Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha Tom Lane
00:32 Re: A bug in NOT IN (SELECT ... Bruce Momjian
00:33 Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane
00:33 Re: [HACKERS] Bug Tom Lane
00:38 Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Tom Lane
00:44 Re: [HACKERS] IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Bruce Momjian
00:49 Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Bruce Momjian
01:00 Re: [HACKERS] Arrays broken on temp tables Bruce Momjian
01:12 Re: [HACKERS] Status of sql_help.h Bruce Momjian
01:20 Re: [HACKERS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Bruce Momjian
01:29 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] A bag of psql goodies Bruce Momjian
01:45 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Michael Robinson
01:55 Re: [HACKERS] UNION not allowed in sub-selects? Bruce Momjian
02:02 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
02:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
02:04 Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_ctl Tom Lane
02:14 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
02:19 Re: [HACKERS] IN clause and INTERSECT not behaving as expected Tom Lane
02:45 Re: [HACKERS] Problems in 6.5.3 with Multi-Byte encoding Tatsuo Ishii
04:23 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Adriaan Joubert
04:42 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Tom Lane
05:06 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Update of bitmask type Bruce Momjian
05:35 Re: [HACKERS] CORBA STATUS Christof Petig
06:15 RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
06:42 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Hannu Krosing
08:26 Insert into view Theo Kramer
08:33 Re: [HACKERS] union and LIMIT problem Oleg Bartunov
09:30 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Peter Eisentraut
10:56 RE: [HACKERS] Insert into view Ansley, Michael
13:10 Re: [HACKERS] Insert into view Tom Lane
13:13 Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? sk.list@comset.net
13:34 Re: [HACKERS] Insert into view Theo Kramer
14:04 Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Oleg Bartunov
14:20 Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Tom Lane
14:34 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Tom Lane
14:45 Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Peter Eisentraut
14:48 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Lamar Owen
14:49 Re: Portability (was Re: [HACKERS] Development installation fails) Vince Vielhaber
15:28 Re: [HACKERS] Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Don Baccus
15:32 tab completion in psql Bruce Momjian
15:34 Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability) Tom Lane
15:41 Re: tab completion in psql Peter Eisentraut
15:53 Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Bruce Momjian
15:55 Re: tab completion in psql Bruce Momjian
15:55 Re: Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability) Vince Vielhaber
16:49 Re: [HACKERS] Re: tab completion in psql Brian E Gallew
17:36 Re: Ownership/protection (was Re: [HACKERS] Portability) Peter Eisentraut
18:20 Re: [HACKERS] sort on huge table Peter Eisentraut
22:04 Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Ian Macdonald
22:23 Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Peter Eisentraut