Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert
Date
Msg-id 199911231958.OAA11605@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert  (Zeugswetter Andreas SEV <ZeugswetterA@wien.spardat.at>)
Responses RE: AW: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
> > > Good point, but (AFAIK) you could only use it for tables that you were
> > > sure no other client was updating in parallel.  Otherwise you might be
> > > updating a just-obsoleted tuple.  Or is there a solution for that?
> > >
> > > > Is someone still working on the xid access ?
> > >
> > > I think we have the ability to refer to CTID in WHERE now, but not yet an
> > > access method that actually makes it fast...
> > 
> > Hiroshi supplied a patch to allow it in the executor, and I applied it.
> >
> 
> Bruce,could you apply my attached patch ?
> I have to add 3 new files but couldn't do 'cvs add'
> the files on my machine.
> Am I mistaken ?
> I couldn't understand the reason now.

Applied.  No idea why the add didn't work there.  It worked here.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vince Vielhaber
Date:
Subject: RE: AW: [HACKERS] SQL statements: begin and end
Next
From: "J. Roeleveld"
Date:
Subject: Fwd: [GENERAL] Problem with CREATE RULE ON DELETE (PostgreSQL only executes the first expression)