Re: [HACKERS] Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Lamar Owen
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES
Date
Msg-id 381F0B96.EFC70C7A@wgcr.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Regression Testing on REL6_5_PATCHES  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:
> 
> Lamar Owen <lamar.owen@wgcr.org> writes:
> > I have hit an unexpected error in regression testing the
> > REL6_5_PATCHES branch in preparing for 6.5.3.  For the first time, a
> > test other than float or geometry failed -- with a weird result.
> > Datetime failed.

> There should be something about this in the "expected failures"
> section of the regress test docs, but right at the moment I don't
> see anything there.

Now it's my turn to feel much better.  The tests that failed were float8
(which is the NaN glibc weirdness we already know about -- I forget the
specifics, but it was tracked down -- although, I had thought that would
be fixed for 6.5.3, but I guess I was mistaken), datetime (which you've
explained), geometry (which failed due to a floating point roundoff
error), and misc (which didn't like the pgaccess preferences tables
being in there).

I'm glad it was something that simple.

--
Lamar Owen
WGCR Internet Radio
1 Peter 4:11


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: AW: [HACKERS] sort on huge table
Next
From: Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
Date:
Subject: AW: AW: [HACKERS] sort on huge table