Re: [HACKERS] regression tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] regression tests
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.9911171427070.18751-100000@Uggla.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] regression tests  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
On Wed, 17 Nov 1999, Jan Wieck wrote:

>     That  should have been done BEFORE messing up anything.  This
>     hasn't been done, so I think it's the job of those who change
>     output  formats,  to  provide new expected regression results
>     too. This hasn't been done too, and that's bad.

I explicitly informed everyone that this would happen a long time before I
finalized psql. Nobody seemed to care a lot. Now, weeks after the fact
some people start wondering that perhaps they want to run regression tests
once in a while. I'm not the regression test maintainer, nor do I have
knowledge of how to remake them, so all I can do is inform everyone and
cooperate on anything that's necessary. But silence is implicit approval.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression tests
Next
From: Lamar Owen
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs....