RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hiroshi Inoue
Subject RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions
Date
Msg-id 000201bf3aca$9a3a9ac0$2801007e@cadzone.tpf.co.jp
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
List pgsql-hackers
Hi all,

I propose here that we stop the release of lock before end of transaction.
I have been suffering from the early release of lock.

Comments ?

If we don't allow DDL command inside transaction block,we won't need
the release before end of transaction.
If we allow DDL command inside transaction block,it may be a problem.
But are there any other principles which could guarantee consistency ?

Regards.

Hiroshi Inoue
Inoue@tpf.co.jp

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql and comments
Next
From: Uncle George
Date:
Subject: Re: [PORTS] Re: [HACKERS] RedHat6.0 & Alpha