cache question - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject cache question
Date
Msg-id 199911220633.BAA18140@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
Responses Re: [HACKERS] cache question  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Re: [HACKERS] cache question  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
Can someone explain why there are two network_ops in the pg_opclass
table?  I am trying to make pg_opclass unique.  We have a cache on
pg_opclass.opcname, so we clearly have a problem here.  

Also, is it safe to set opcdeftype to a non-zero value so I can make
that index unique too?

This stuff confusing.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Reproducible vacuum complaint!
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] cache question