Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> Can someone explain why there are two network_ops in the pg_opclass
> table?
Looks like one is for type inet and the other for type cidr. I'm
still confused about the difference between the two types (hey,
I ain't Paul Vixie) but I suspect we don't really need two entries
in pg_opclass for them --- the types are binary-equivalent according
to parse_coerce.h. If we do need two entries, they should be given
different names.
> This stuff confusing.
It's 1:30AM EST ... way past time to be doing serious work, at least
in this time zone ...
regards, tom lane
