> Next question is what to do about it. I don't suppose we have any way
> of turning off the OS' read-ahead algorithm :-(. We could forget about
> this space-recycling improvement and go back to separate temp files.
> The objection to that, of course, is that while sorting might be faster,
> it doesn't matter how fast the algorithm is if you don't have the disk
> space to execute it.
If I am correct on the Linux seek thing, and Tatsuo is running Linux, is
there any way to fake out the kernel on only Linux, so we issue two
reads in a row before doing a seek?
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
