Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.20.9911061441190.347-100000@peter-e.yi.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] New version of psql  (Bruce Momjian <maillist@candle.pha.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 1999-11-04, Bruce Momjian mentioned:

> > > Surely make it # if the user is a postgres superuser or > if not
> > > 
> > > Makes it consistent and functional.
> > 
> > I see now. Thanks.  Makes sense.
> 
> Peter, are you working on libpq as well?

Nope.

My next projects where to put in the tab completion I have lying around
here, to implement some sort if \if \else \endif so you can write *really*
cool scripts, and to adjust the createdb etc. scripts a little.

Then I would be available for doing a little libpq stuff, but I'm not even
sure what needs to be done. Bring it on . . .

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: New version of psql
Next
From: Ryan Kirkpatrick
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL 6.5.3 built, but not released ...