> > I took Peter Eisentraut's advice and did it with the old pslq
> > (thanks for the hint).
> >
> > This problem (as expected) remains and happens in the temp
> > test. The two notices occur on creating the temp table and
> > the index on it. After that, the database connection get's
> > lost on the attempt to drop the temp table.
> >
> > Since the postmaster is doing recovery then, the numeric test
> > hasn't been run. All other tests are still O.K.
> >
> > The question is, who did something that could cause this
> > error?
>
> I am sure it was me changing the temp behavior. I will look at it.
Jan, I can't reproduce the temp regression failure here. I did make
changes yesterday morning to this. I assume you have an updated cvs,
right?
Anyway to make the default numeric regression test run faster. It seems
to take quite a while compared to the others.
We certainly need someone to update the regression tests to match the
new format so people can continue running regression tests before
applying patches.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
