Re: [HACKERS] RE: Unique indexes on system tables - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RE: Unique indexes on system tables
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.9911171209050.29920-100000@Lodjur.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to RE: Unique indexes on system tables  ("Hiroshi Inoue" <Inoue@tpf.co.jp>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] RE: Unique indexes on system tables  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
On Tue, 16 Nov 1999, Hiroshi Inoue wrote:

> I am only afraid of index corruption.
> The more we have system indexes,the more index corruption would happen.

Just a concerned user question: Why does index corruption seem to happen
so often or is a genuine concern? Wouldn't the next thing be table
corruption? Or are indices optimized for speed rather than correctness
because they don't contain important data?

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgresql Docs....
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] regression tests