Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension
Date
Msg-id Pine.GSO.4.02A.9911131436450.606-100000@Val.DoCS.UU.SE
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] RFC: create/alter user extension  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 12 Nov 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > Is everyone okay with the following syntax:
> > CREATE USER username
> > [ WITH ID digits ]
> > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> > The catch is that ID would have to be a new keyword and we'd have to live
> > with that for a long time. Other choices include:
> > * UID
> > * SYSID
> > * USESYSID
> > etc.
> 
> I'd be inclined to go with UID or SYSID.  In any case, since the new
> keyword is used in such a limited context, we could almost certainly
> still allow it as a ColId and thus not create any real compatibility
> problem.

I'm not sure about this distinction. Where would that be reflected in the
(parser) code?
-Peter

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders vaeg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Backend build fails in current