Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From The Hermit Hacker
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates
Date
Msg-id Pine.BSF.4.10.9911222250470.14653-100000@thelab.hub.org
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
List pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 22 Nov 1999, Tom Lane wrote:

> The Hermit Hacker <scrappy@hub.org> writes:
> > one of the things I remember seeing discussed, and wonder about current
> > status on:
> >     removal of the whole pg_vlock requirement on vacuum?
> 
> I have that on my to-do list; as far as I know it's a trivial code
> change, but I just haven't gotten to it.  Maybe I'll try it tonight.

is this something that could safely be back-patched into v6.5.x's tree?
have at least one project that could really use the ability to vacuum a
database without the tables being locked :)

Marc G. Fournier                   ICQ#7615664               IRC Nick: Scrappy
Systems Administrator @ hub.org 
primary: scrappy@hub.org           secondary: scrappy@{freebsd|postgresql}.org 



pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: TODO updates
Next
From: Vadim Mikheev
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 7.0 status request