> It's me who added the function.
> I left it undocumented,sorry.
> Bruce,could you add an document on it ?
Done. Will commit soon.
>
> Bruce added a new index to pg_index.
> Index scan needs an information of pg_index.
> If we use the new index,we needs the information about the index
> in pg_index.
> Doesn't this cause a real cycle ?
Yes. I am using it for a pg_operator index too.
>
> I added the function in order to hold one tuple which causes a real
> cycle. The tuple in pg_index should be scanned sequentially.
>
> I don't think it's the best solution.
> Please change it if there's a better way.
I talked to Tom, and we think it is a good solution.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
