Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file
Date
Msg-id 840.942984418@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] pg version date file
List pgsql-hackers
Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
>> src/include/catalog/catversion.h.
>> 
>> I put it there on the theory that include/catalog/*.h changes would
>> be the most common reason for wanting to bump the serial number.
>> But maybe it belongs somewhere else...

> I just couldn't find it.  I looked in include only because version.h.in
> was there.

You could certainly make a case for moving it to src/include.  If
you want to do that, I won't object.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Hash Join is very slooow in some cases
Next
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL