> So, you see that this idea came not to Oracle only...
>
> I don't object against DDLs inside BEGIN/END.
Yes, I know. All I object against is, that a DDL statement commits
my previous update/insert/delete statements.
> I just mean that it's not required by standard.
> If someone is ready to fix this area - welcome.
imho it is ok, to disallow ddl inside transaction,
until somebody fixes rollback.
>
> Vadim
> P.S. Is DROP TABLE rollback-able in Informix, Andreas?
Yes.
Andreas
