Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Ross J. Reedstrom
Subject Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Date
Msg-id 19991118171333.A18543@wallace.ece.rice.edu
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
List pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Nov 18, 1999 at 05:41:36PM -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> > * Since no one has picked up on my idea to run the tests directly on the
> > backend, I will keep reiterating this idea until someone shuts me up
> > :*) The idea would be to have a target "check" in the top level makefile
> > like this (conceptually):
> 
> Running the backend standalone does not use locking with other backends,
> so it is dangerous.

Bruce, how dos this apply to Peter's suggestion?  We're talking about
_regression_ tests. Things to do after changing the code. Do you often
recompile, and run regression tests against a db with a (now out of date)
postmaster running against it? Do other developers?  I'd have thought a
complete shutdown/restart is part of the cycle anyway.  has to be if an
initdb is in there of course.  Checking to make sure a postmaster isn't
running could be added to Peter's script, just to be sure.

Ross
-- 
Ross J. Reedstrom, Ph.D., <reedstrm@rice.edu> 
NSBRI Research Scientist/Programmer
Computer and Information Technology Institute
Rice University, 6100 S. Main St.,  Houston, TX 77005


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests