Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL
Date
Msg-id 199911190458.XAA25578@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Primary key requires SERIAL  (Don Baccus <dhogaza@pacifier.com>)
List pgsql-hackers
> At 11:19 PM 11/18/99 -0500, Bruce Momjian wrote:
> >> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> >> > We currently only allow the words PRIMARY KEY on a SERIAL column.
> >> 
> >> Say what?  There are ColConstraintElem and ConstraintElem productions
> >> for PRIMARY KEY ... are they broken?
> >> 
> >>             regards, tom lane
> >> 
> >
> >Oh, I see it now.  The grammer seems to only support it in SERIAL, but I
> >see it works now.  I guess i am surprised SERIAL PRIMARY creates the
> >index and sequence, while INTEGER PRIMARY only creates the index.
> 
> Oops, I guess I blew it by responding to a post by Bruce assuming he
> was right.

Seems I can't realy on understanding what we support by just looking at
gram.y.


--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] psql & regress tests
Next
From: "Aaron J. Seigo"
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Getting OID in psql of recent insert