Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 December 1999

• 00:30   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Lamar Owen
• 03:19   Re: [HACKERS] Tricky query, tricky response Tom Lane
• 03:20   Grabbing Data from serial port into postgres svn
• 06:55   Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? sk.list@comset.net
• 07:06   Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? sk.list@comset.net
• 07:55   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
• 08:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
• 12:39   TRANSACTION "WARNINGS" jose soares
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
• 13:03   AW: [HACKERS] Insert into view Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Vadim Mikheev
• 13:04   AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Zeugswetter Andreas SEV
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
• 15:59   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? Bruce Momjian
• 19:24   NOTICE: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress Kristofer Munn
• 21:28   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: AbortTransaction and not in in-progress Tom Lane
• 22:53   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue

2 December 1999

• 07:18   Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? sk.list@comset.net
• 09:42   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Joe Brenner
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Vince Vielhaber
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Lamar Owen
• 14:47   Re: [ADMIN] When postgres will be faster? The Hermit Hacker
• 16:11   Searching For Business Partner Ron Howell
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org:Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Lamar Owen
• 19:53   Neat article you will want to read. Lamar Owen
• 20:08   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL Vince Vielhaber
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] Neat article you will want to read. The Hermit Hacker
• 21:00   Re: [HACKERS] Neat article you will want to read. Vince Vielhaber
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] Neat article you will want to read. Vince Vielhaber

3 December 1999

• 00:35   Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm??? Tim Perdue
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm??? Aaron J. Seigo
• 02:37   Re: [HACKERS] Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm??? Don Baccus
• 04:29   postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:34   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Bruce Momjian
• 05:57   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:09   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Bruce Momjian
• 06:17   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:35   RE: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL .org:Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (f wd)) Magnus Hagander
• 06:41   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Bruce Momjian
• 06:44   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:37   Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:33   Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm?? Tim Perdue
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm?? Tom Lane
• 13:27   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:47   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Thomas Lockhart
• 14:04   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:06   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org:Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Lamar Owen
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm?? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:29   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Thomas Lockhart
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Ed Loehr
• 14:40   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Vince Vielhaber
• 14:45   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Lamar Owen
• 14:52   emacs question Thomas Lockhart
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Lamar Owen
• 14:54   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Thomas Lockhart
• 15:05   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Thomas Lockhart
• 15:17   Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Lamar Owen
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] Brain-Dead Sort Algorithm?? Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Bruce Momjian
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Evan Simpson
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [Fwd: postgresql-6.5.3. RPMs (Well Done!)] Vince Vielhaber
• 16:05   Re: emacs question Tom Lane
• 16:17   postgresql authentification for popper Olivier PRENANT
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql authentification for popper Vince Vielhaber
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql authentification for popper The Hermit Hacker
• 16:49   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) 
• 18:07   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) 
• 18:20   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) 
• 18:42   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Andy Lewis
• 19:02   Re: Geometric Data Type in PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart
• 19:02   Re: emacs question Thomas Lockhart
• 19:02   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Thomas Lockhart
• 19:12   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Thomas Lockhart
• 19:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Geometric Data Type in PostgreSQL Jeff Hoffmann
• 20:39   Re: Datetime operators (was: Re: [SQL] Another Date question) Tom Lane
• 21:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tim Holloway

4 December 1999

• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster.pid Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:10   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Daniel Veillard
• 14:06   Availability of SQL standards Peter Eisentraut
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] Availability of SQL standards Bruce Momjian
• 17:35   Raising funds for PostgreSQL Kyle Bateman
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] Availability of SQL standards Oliver Elphick
• 18:32   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 18:52   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Ed Loehr
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Aaron J. Seigo
• 21:48   RE: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] drop/rename table and transactions Hiroshi Inoue

5 December 1999

• 04:09   When is 7.0 going Beta? Mike Mascari
• 11:59   The Accountant is not Amused Michael Robinson
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] The Accountant is not Amused Aaron J. Seigo
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] The Accountant is not Amused Tom Lane
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] The Accountant is not Amused Michael Robinson
• 20:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Geometric Data Type in PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 20:34   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 20:51   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Vince Vielhaber
• 20:51   postconfig/PGLIB/initdb Peter Eisentraut
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] The Accountant is not Amused Peter Eisentraut
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] postconfig/PGLIB/initdb Tom Lane
• 22:56   Oft Ask: How to contribute to PostgreSQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 23:51   Re: [HACKERS] Availability of SQL standards Thomas Lockhart
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Thomas Lockhart
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] The Accountant is not Amused Thomas Lockhart

6 December 1999

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Geometric Data Type in PostgreSQL Thomas Lockhart
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Vadim Mikheev
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Tom Lane
• 02:30   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 06:51   pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:13   RAW I/O device Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 09:57   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl Peter Eisentraut
• 10:40   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:00   RE: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Horak Daniel
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device merlin@scl.cwru.edu
• 11:26   RE: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Horak Daniel
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Ing. Pavel PaJaSoft Janousek
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Bruce Momjian
• 12:45   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device The Hermit Hacker
• 14:48   Binary-compatible type follies Tom Lane
• 14:59   memory problem again Daniel Kalchev
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Malcolm Beattie
• 16:29   FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:27   A view just stopped working out of the blue... Don Baccus
• 17:43   Re: [HACKERS] A view just stopped working out of the blue... wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 17:52   FOREIGN KEY again wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:13   RE: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Ansley, Michael
• 18:22   Re: view dying out of the blue... Don Baccus
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 19:35   Multibyte in autoconf Peter Eisentraut
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Kyle Bateman
• 20:30   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Bruce Momjian
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:09   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Tom Lane
• 23:13   Re: [HACKERS] pg_ctl Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:19   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 23:55   Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Tom Lane

7 December 1999

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 00:14   Re: [GENERAL] Oft Ask: How to contribute to PostgreSQL? Lincoln Yeoh
• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 00:26   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:13   Re: [GENERAL] Oft Ask: How to contribute to PostgreSQL? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Bruce Momjian
• 01:28   Re: Book - SQL Aggregates Bruce Momjian
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Bruce Momjian
• 01:44   Postgresql in win9x Chris Ian Capon Fiel
• 01:59   RE: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:05   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Bruce Momjian
• 02:15   Re: [HACKERS] TLE subselects (was: Raising funds for PostgreSQL) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 02:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Book - SQL Aggregates Tom Lane
• 02:41   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:12   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Tom Lane
• 03:39   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Vadim Mikheev
• 05:24   RE: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Peter Mount
• 05:36   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Geometric Data Type in PostgreSQL Peter Mount
• 06:14   Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Daniel Kalchev
• 06:26   (resolution?) Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Daniel Kalchev
• 06:50   RE: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Peter Mount
• 07:48   AW: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:54   Re: [HACKERS] TRANSACTION "WARNINGS" jose soares
• 08:45   AW: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:07   AW: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:11   ÍøÂçµç»°£¬Ãâ·Ñ³¤Í¾£¬¹ú¼Ê¹úÄÚ£¬ÖÕÉíÃâ·Ñ info@wd-g.com
• 10:09   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Peter Eisentraut
• 10:10   Re: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:15   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Bruce Momjian
• 10:15   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Bruce Momjian
• 10:29   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:34   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Sergio A. Kessler
• 11:01   RE: [GENERAL] Postgresql in win9x Fabian.Frederick@prov-liege.be
• 11:04   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:08   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:45   Re: AW: [HACKERS] RAW I/O device wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:54   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Thomas Lockhart
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:57   Referential integrity matthias.oestreicher@istec.de
• 12:16   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Thomas Lockhart
• 12:23   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Thomas Lockhart
• 13:05   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tom Lane
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Vince Vielhaber
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:04   Re: (resolution?) Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: (resolution?) Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Daniel Kalchev
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Peter Eisentraut
• 15:21   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Kyle Bateman
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Tom Lane
• 15:53   Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) Tom Lane
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Ed Loehr
• 16:10   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) Peter Eisentraut
• 16:21   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) Tom Lane
• 16:35   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Kyle Bateman
• 16:37   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) Vince Vielhaber
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:03   Re: Postgresql in win9x Lamar Owen
• 19:16   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL The Hermit Hacker
• 19:52   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Kyle Bateman
• 19:58   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and Peter Eisentraut
• 20:39   Table aliases in delete statements? Keith Parks
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and Tom Lane
• 21:34   Re: (resolution?) Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Bruce Momjian
• 22:26   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Bruce Momjian
• 22:39   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:49   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Keith Parks

8 December 1999

• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] perl-DBD-Pg (was Re: BOUNCE pgsql-ports@postgreSQL.org: Non-member submission from[Joe Brenner ] (fwd)) Lamar Owen
• 02:07   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Bruce Momjian
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Tom Lane
• 05:24   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tatsuo Ishii
• 05:40   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Bruce Momjian
• 05:49   Re: (resolution?) Re: [HACKERS] memory problem again Tom Lane
• 06:26   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Tom Lane
• 06:27   FreeBSD problem under heavy load Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:35   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tom Lane
• 07:17   Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:58   Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
• 09:11   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Keith Parks
• 09:38   Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
• 10:01   Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
• 11:32   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Peter Eisentraut
• 12:01   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Brian E Gallew
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:29   Free SQLweb interface to postgresql w/E-Commerce capabilities Don Schindhelm
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Thomas Lockhart
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] When is 7.0 going Beta? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:50   Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Tom Lane
• 13:54   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce) Thomas Lockhart
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) Thomas Lockhart
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) Tom Lane
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Kyle Bateman
• 14:56   Small timezone bug fixed Jeroen van Vianen
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:54   Re: [GENERAL] Suggested "minor" change to psql Brook Milligan
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL Ed Loehr
• 18:09   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:15   Advanced projects ... anyone interested? Gunther Schadow
• 20:54   Postgresql 6.5.3-2 for redhat 6.1 Frans Van Elsacker
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Keith Parks
• 22:13   More initdb follies Peter Eisentraut
• 22:13   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Peter Eisentraut
• 23:05   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:32   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tom Lane
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies Tom Lane
• 23:49   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) Tom Lane

9 December 1999

• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies Bruce Momjian
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies Bruce Momjian
• 01:21   Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements? Bruce Momjian
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] Postgresql 6.5.3-2 for redhat 6.1 Lamar Owen
• 02:06   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 02:06   pg_sorttemp hits 2GB during index construction Martin Weinberg
• 02:33   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) Don Baccus
• 02:42   Pooled postgresql backends Lamar Owen
• 02:55   PostgreSQL front ends (was Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)) Lamar Owen
• 03:03   Re: [HACKERS] Small timezone bug fixed Bruce Momjian
• 04:21   Re: [HACKERS] pg_sorttemp hits 2GB during index construction Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) Tom Lane
• 05:31   RE: [INTERFACES] Transaction support in 6.5.3/JDBC Peter Mount
• 05:49   RE: [HACKERS] Pooled postgresql backends Peter Mount
• 07:03   Re: [HACKERS] Advanced projects ... anyone interested? Michael Meskes
• 10:07   Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies Oliver Elphick
• 14:10   alter table crashes back end Don Baccus
• 14:10   check contraints incorrectly reject "null" Don Baccus
• 14:10   Re: PostgreSQL front ends (was Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)) Don Baccus
• 17:20   Re: [INTERFACES] Transaction support in 6.5.3/JDBC Assaf Arkin
• 17:51   Weired FK problem wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:00   Re: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem Bruce Momjian
• 21:48   RE: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:39   Re: [HACKERS] check contraints incorrectly reject "null" Tom Lane
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) Peter Eisentraut

10 December 1999

• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] alter table crashes back end Tom Lane
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Tom Lane
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load Tom Lane
• 02:11   pgsql web site busted? Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql web site busted? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 03:57   Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:26   OK, what's this LDREL all about? Tom Lane
• 04:35   Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about? Bruce Momjian
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Mike Mascari
• 04:43   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Tom Lane
• 04:56   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 04:58   Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load Tom Lane
• 05:09   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 05:11   Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Christof Petig
• 05:30   RE: [INTERFACES] Transaction support in 6.5.3/JDBC Peter Mount
• 05:37   RE: [INTERFACES] Transaction support in 6.5.3/JDBC Peter Mount
• 05:46   RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Mount
• 05:56   RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Mount
• 06:07   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 06:08   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Vadim Mikheev
• 06:12   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 06:16   RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Mount
• 06:21   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 06:34   RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Mount
• 08:31   Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load Tatsuo Ishii
• 08:59   insert using select with limit Theo Kramer
• 09:39   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Vince Vielhaber
• 10:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 10:50   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 11:35   question Michael Meskes
• 11:59   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 12:49   First draft of pg_group admin tool. jscottb@www.lowcountry.com
• 13:02   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 13:09   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:24   RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Mount
• 13:34   RE: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] insert using select with limit Tom Lane
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Thomas Lockhart
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Thomas Lockhart
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] question Vince Vielhaber
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce Thomas Lockhart
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 14:57   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] FOREIGN KEY and shift/reduce wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Thomas Lockhart
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Thomas Lockhart
• 16:42   First draft of pg_group admin tool. jscottb@InfoAve.Net
• 17:01   First draft of pg_group admin tool. Scott Beasley
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] question Lamar Owen
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem Bruce Momjian
• 18:03   Re: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] question Michael Meskes
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] question Vince Vielhaber
• 19:01   Re: [HACKERS] question mdorman-pgsql.hackers@debian.org
• 19:12   postgresql authentification for popper Olivier PRENANT
• 19:54   Re: [HACKERS] postgresql authentification for popper mdorman-pgsql.hackers@debian.org
• 20:28   Re: [HACKERS] Weired FK problem Bruce Momjian
• 21:36   Error in new psql wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] Multibyte in autoconf Peter Eisentraut
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies Peter Eisentraut
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies Peter Eisentraut
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:58   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 23:03   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] First draft of pg_group admin tool. Peter Eisentraut
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Eisentraut
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] FreeBSD problem under heavy load Peter Eisentraut
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about? Peter Eisentraut
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Eisentraut
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Eisentraut

11 December 1999

• 00:34   Industrial-Strength Logging Tim Holloway
• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 00:41   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 01:04   Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about? Bruce Momjian
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Thomas Lockhart
• 01:26   psql & regression (was: Error in new psql) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:43   Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql Bruce Momjian
• 01:43   Re: psql & regression (was: Error in new psql) Bruce Momjian
• 02:06   Re: psql & regression (was: Error in new psql) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 03:41   LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 07:26   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Hannu Krosing
• 10:48   Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys Peter Eisentraut
• 10:49   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 10:56   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:52   Re: Mirroring a DB Peter Eisentraut
• 13:16   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Don Baccus
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 14:02   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Peter Eisentraut
• 14:29   Last thoughts about LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Peter Eisentraut
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:33   UNICODE characters vs. BINARY Gunther Schadow
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys Tom Lane
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane
• 16:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Mirroring a DB Tom Lane
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:53   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Tom Lane
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Tom Lane
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 17:20   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Hannu Krosing
• 17:27   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG Hannu Krosing
• 17:37   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Hannu Krosing
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Hannu Krosing
• 19:11   Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:32   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Mirroring a DB Karl DeBisschop
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Mirroring a DB Karl DeBisschop
• 19:59   createdb with alternate location Peter Eisentraut
• 20:44   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:13   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 21:55   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 23:41   Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

12 December 1999

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys Peter Eisentraut
• 03:55   Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian
• 03:55   Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Mirroring a DB Tom Lane
• 04:14   Re: [HACKERS] createdb with alternate location Tom Lane
• 04:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] pg_dump primary keys Tom Lane
• 09:12   Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:03   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Vadim Mikheev
• 10:22   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Vadim Mikheev
• 13:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian
• 13:01   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 16:03   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 16:52   Help Morfeus
• 17:16   Work plan: aggregate(DISTINCT ...) Tom Lane
• 17:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Hannu Krosing
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:01   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 19:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Jesus, what have I done (was: LONG) Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus
• 20:43   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus
• 20:59   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane
• 21:04   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane
• 21:27   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Vince Vielhaber
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Don Baccus
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 21:47   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Vince Vielhaber
• 22:26   generic LONG VARLENA wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 23:25   RE: [HACKERS] LONG Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian

13 December 1999

• 00:03   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Tom Lane
• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Tom Lane
• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Tom Lane
• 00:56   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 00:56   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Tom Lane
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Tom Lane
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 01:32   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Tom Lane
• 01:34   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 01:53   RE: [HACKERS] LONG Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:05   update_pg_pwd wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 02:13   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 02:13   RE: [HACKERS] LONG Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:34   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Bruce Momjian
• 02:34   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Bruce Momjian
• 02:58   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Tom Lane
• 03:16   RE: [HACKERS] LONG Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 04:04   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Bruce Momjian
• 04:35   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 04:53   Re: [HACKERS] LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 06:10   RE: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Peter Mount
• 07:07   Warnung! 
• 07:39   RE: [HACKERS] LONG Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:40   Warnung 
• 08:36   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Hannu Krosing
• 09:03   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Peter Eisentraut
• 09:09   Datatype MONEY Michael Meskes
• 09:12   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Peter Eisentraut
• 09:15   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Peter Eisentraut
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Peter Eisentraut
• 09:45   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:27   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:40   Re: [HACKERS] createdb with alternate location Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:42   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:05   Is something wrong here? Mike Mascari
• 11:43   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:51   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:10   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:28   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:50   AW: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Michael Meskes
• 12:59   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Tom Lane
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Tom Lane
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Gunther Schadow
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:03   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Tom Lane
• 16:54   [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 18:43   Create Group Peter Eisentraut
• 20:25   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] Create Group Tom Lane
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] generic LONG VARLENA Bruce Momjian
• 21:22   Re: [HACKERS] createdb with alternate location Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   pg_createuser Peter Eisentraut
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Peter Eisentraut
• 21:31   Re: Followup to my bug report Bruce Momjian
• 21:32   Re: Followup to my bug report Mark Dalphin
• 22:03   Re: [HACKERS] update_pg_pwd Bruce Momjian
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] pg_createuser Bruce Momjian

14 December 1999

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Bruce Momjian
• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Bruce Momjian
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Thomas Lockhart
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Vadim Mikheev
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release The Hermit Hacker
• 02:20   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Michael Robinson
• 05:32   Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY Thomas Lockhart
• 05:46   Re: [HACKERS] LONG Christof Petig
• 05:47   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Christof Petig
• 06:55   Questionable codes Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:55   RE: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:40   Re: [HACKERS] Create Group Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:06   AW: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:46   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Vince Vielhaber
• 08:52   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:13   Re: [HACKERS] Create Group Peter Eisentraut
• 09:17   AW: [HACKERS] Create Group Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 12:18   Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes Thomas Lockhart
• 12:31   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Thomas Lockhart
• 12:38   Re: [HACKERS] libpq questions...when threads collide Vince Vielhaber
• 13:08   Re: [HACKERS] Datatype MONEY Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Questionable codes Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Questionable codes Tom Lane
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes Tom Lane
• 15:27   Transactions ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:14   [6.5.3] FATAL 1: my bits moved right off the end of the world! The Hermit Hacker
• 16:34   Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY Gunther Schadow
• 16:53   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY Don Baccus
• 17:21   Arrays Peter Eisentraut
• 17:21   Re: [HACKERS] Create Group Peter Eisentraut
• 18:06   Re: [HACKERS] Transactions ... Tom Lane
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] FATAL 1: my bits moved right off the end of the world! Tom Lane
• 18:28   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Tom Lane
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] FATAL 1: my bits moved right off the end of the world! The Hermit Hacker
• 19:40   Re: Backend core dump, Please help, Urgent! Tom Lane
• 19:41   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:46   Backend core dump, Please help, Urgent! Matthew Hagerty
• 20:46   ordering RH6.1 Frans Van Elsacker
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] UNICODE characters vs. BINARY Peter Eisentraut
• 20:57   Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 21:12   Backend core dump, different server! Matthew Hagerty
• 21:30   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Tom Lane
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes Tom Lane
• 22:14   Bug or feature? select, count(*), group by and empty tables Don Baccus
• 22:35   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? select, count(*), group by and empty tables Don Baccus

15 December 1999

• 00:39   RE: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Bruce Momjian
• 03:53   Re: [HACKERS] Bug or feature? select, count(*), group by and empty tables Tom Lane
• 06:16   postmaster dies (6.5.3) Oleg Bartunov
• 06:28   Re: [HACKERS] Volunteer: Large Tuples / Tuple chaining Christof Petig
• 08:29   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Oliver Elphick
• 09:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Backend core dump, Please help, Urgent! Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:01   Re: [PATCHES] non-blocking patches. Bruce Momjian
• 13:10    Vince Vielhaber
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] From: Vince Vielhaber  Thomas Lockhart
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Lamar Owen
• 13:57   initdb / pg_version Patrick Welche
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] AND && Vince Vielhaber
• 14:24   dumpall prob Patrick Welche
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] AND && Don Baccus
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob Thomas Lockhart
• 15:06   SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Tom Lane
• 15:23   Re: [HACKERS] initdb / pg_version Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] AND && Tom Lane
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob Patrick Welche
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] AND && Tom Lane
• 15:38   AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] initdb / pg_version Patrick Welche
• 16:20   Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob Patrick Welche
• 17:25   Re: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Don Baccus
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Don Baccus
• 17:41   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dies (6.5.3) Matthew Hagerty
• 17:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Backend core dump, Please help, Urgent! Matthew Hagerty
• 17:59   Re: [HACKERS] postmaster dies (6.5.3) Matthew Hagerty
• 18:44   pg_dump --help Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 21:27   Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Matthew Hagerty
• 21:33   NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Keith Parks
• 21:41   Finding corrupt data Matthew Hagerty
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. The Hermit Hacker
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Don Baccus
• 21:47   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 23:21   Re: [HACKERS] dumpall prob Bruce Momjian
• 23:25   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help Bruce Momjian
• 23:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian
• 23:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [BUGS] uniqueness not always correct Bruce Momjian

16 December 1999

• 01:10   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Tom Lane
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Tom Lane
• 01:47   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 04:34   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 05:05   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 06:04   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Ed Loehr
• 06:30   AW: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVIN G Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:59   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Hannu Krosing
• 08:08   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:00    feng hao
• 10:15   Re: [HACKERS] initdb / pg_version Peter Eisentraut
• 10:23   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help Peter Eisentraut
• 10:29   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 10:59   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:21   INSERT in 7.0 Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Tim Holloway
• 12:24   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVIN G Tom Lane
• 12:27   Re: [HACKERS] initdb / pg_version Tom Lane
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] INSERT in 7.0 Tom Lane
• 12:39   RE: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Ansley, Michael
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Tom Lane
• 12:46   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Tom Lane
• 12:52   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVIN G Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:23   AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:26   \copy problem Jose Soares
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump --help Bruce Momjian
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Oracle Compatibility (Translate function) Edwin Ramirez
• 15:03   access control lists ( acl ) Nicolas Nappe
• 15:03   Arrays and pg_groupr Nicolas Nappe
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Ed Loehr
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Bruce Momjian
• 15:58   Re: [HACKERS] Finding corrupt data Ed Loehr
• 17:24   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Keith Parks
• 17:38   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Tim Holloway
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Bruce Momjian
• 18:44   RE: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Ansley, Michael
• 20:31   Prepared for LONG wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Frans Van Elsacker
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Lamar Owen
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Peter Eisentraut
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] createdb/dropdb fixes Peter Eisentraut
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] initdb / pg_version Peter Eisentraut
• 22:28   Re: [HACKERS] \copy problem Peter Eisentraut
• 23:37   Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Tom Lane
• 23:58   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Lamar Owen

17 December 1999

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Tom Lane
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Don Baccus
• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Don Baccus
• 01:26   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Lamar Owen
• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Cristian Gafton
• 01:54   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Lamar Owen
• 02:05   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Lamar Owen
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Ed Loehr
• 03:24   Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Jeroen van Vianen
• 03:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Ed Loehr
• 04:09   Re: [HACKERS] ordering RH6.1 Ed Loehr
• 04:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Tom Lane
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Tom Lane
• 06:02   pointer to a table Rahul Ravindrudu
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Ed Loehr
• 07:31   AW: [HACKERS] SELECT ... AS ... names in WHERE/GROUP BY/HAVING Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:46   Re: [HACKERS] \copy problem Jose Soares
• 08:50   Re: [HACKERS] Postmaster options, process spawning, logging, etc. Oleg Bartunov
• 09:07   LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:26   psql vs. gcc Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:41   Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc Thomas Lockhart
• 12:43   bug in Debian's pgaccess package Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:40   Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Peter Eisentraut
• 13:40   Shell scripts (Re: [PATCHES] initdb new&improved) Peter Eisentraut
• 13:45   INITDB doesn't create views wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] bug in Debian's pgaccess package Oliver Elphick
• 14:49   psql compile errors wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Thomas Lockhart
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc Tom Lane
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 15:46   Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc Bruce Momjian
• 15:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:56   Re: [HACKERS] bug in Debian's pgaccess package Bruce Momjian
• 16:01   Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Bruce Momjian
• 16:13   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 17:37   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:39   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 19:36   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:03   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 20:45   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 20:52   psql/sql_help.h Bruce Momjian
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] psql/sql_help.h Tom Lane
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 21:14   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Keith Parks
• 21:19   Mail list archive search busted? Tom Lane
• 21:32   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:35   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:35   Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Tom Lane
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Tom Lane
• 21:48   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:52   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:33   Re: [HACKERS] psql/sql_help.h Bruce Momjian
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Bruce Momjian
• 23:19   RE: [HACKERS] Mail list archive search busted? Vince Vielhaber
• 23:52   ctags problem Jeroen van Vianen
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

18 December 1999

• 00:00   SIGSEGV in initdb Jeroen van Vianen
• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Bruce Momjian
• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] SIGSEGV in initdb Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   initdb messed up Bruce Momjian
• 00:57   Re: [HACKERS] initdb messed up Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Don Baccus
• 02:07   initdb.sh fixed Bruce Momjian
• 02:53   Re: [HACKERS] Oracle Compatibility (Translate function) Thomas Lockhart
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Tom Lane
• 04:08   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Keith Parks
• 04:15   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 04:34   SPI header dependencies Mike Mascari
• 11:01   Re: [HACKERS] psql vs. gcc Peter Eisentraut
• 11:02   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:02   Re: [HACKERS] psql compile errors Peter Eisentraut
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies Tom Lane
• 15:34    Frans Van Elsacker
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] psql compile errors Tom Lane
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies Oliver Elphick
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Peter Eisentraut
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Peter Eisentraut
• 17:02   pgindent (Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on) Peter Eisentraut
• 17:02   Re: initdb.sh fixed Peter Eisentraut
• 18:22   Re: initdb.sh fixed Bruce Momjian
• 18:28   Re: [PATCHES] Lock Bruce Momjian
• 18:35   Re: pgindent (Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on)t Bruce Momjian
• 19:38   Re: [HACKERS] Cc: lamar.owen@wgcr.org Oleg Bartunov
• 19:45   Re: pgindent (Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on)t Vince Vielhaber
• 19:59   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Tom Lane
• 20:16   Re: pgindent (Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on) Tom Lane
• 21:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock Brook Milligan
• 21:58   Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies Mike Mascari
• 22:07   Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies Brook Milligan

19 December 1999

• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock Tom Lane
• 07:28   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:45   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Keith Parks
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 19:20   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 20:33   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Tom Lane
• 22:13   Re: [HACKERS] psql compile errors Peter Eisentraut
• 22:13   Re: [HACKERS] Anyone for prettyprinted EXPLAIN VERBOSE? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:13   Re: pgindent (Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on)t Peter Eisentraut
• 22:13   Re: [PATCHES] Lock Peter Eisentraut
• 22:13   Re: initdb.sh fixed Peter Eisentraut

20 December 1999

• 00:23   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed7 Bruce Momjian
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock Bruce Momjian
• 00:31   Re: initdb.sh fixed Bruce Momjian
• 00:31   Re: pgindent (Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on)t Bruce Momjian
• 00:35   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/libpgeasy (libpgeasy.c) Bruce Momjian
• 00:36   Re: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Bruce Momjian
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock Tom Lane
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Tom Lane
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Bruce Momjian
• 02:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Tom Lane
• 02:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Bruce Momjian
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Tom Lane
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Bruce Momjian
• 05:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Notation for nextval() (was Re: Several small patches) Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:43   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:42   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Tom Lane
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Tom Lane
• 13:31   Re: QUESTION: Replication Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/libpgeasy (libpgeasy.c) Tom Lane
• 13:51   New Catia 5 r 4 and other appz!!! NormanD
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed7 Keith Parks
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] Cc: lamar.owen@wgcr.org Lamar Owen
• 15:20   Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies Lamar Owen
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 16:17   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on Bruce Momjian
• 16:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/interfaces/libpgeasy (libpgeasy.c) Bruce Momjian
• 16:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed7 Bruce Momjian
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Cc: lamar.owen@wgcr.org Lamar Owen
• 16:30   Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies Lamar Owen
• 17:38   SPI Headers -- RPM distribution Lamar Owen
• 17:57   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 18:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: QUESTION: Replication Goran Thyni
• 18:42   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution Brook Milligan
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed7 Keith Parks
• 19:29   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 19:47   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution Lamar Owen
• 21:28   Tuple toaster (was: Re: LONG varsize - how to go on) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 21:47   LONG vs. Toaster wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:46   T-O-A-S-T meaning wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)

21 December 1999

• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Bruce Momjian
• 02:12   Re: [HACKERS] LONG vs. Toaster Bruce Momjian
• 02:55   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Tom Lane
• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] LONG vs. Toaster Tom Lane
• 03:08   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution Tom Lane
• 03:42   Re: [HACKERS] Tuple toaster (was: Re: LONG varsize - how to go on) Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Bruce Momjian
• 07:05   AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:27   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Vince Vielhaber
• 10:14   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Vince Vielhaber
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:38   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution Lamar Owen
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] SPI Headers -- RPM distribution Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 14:40   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 14:58   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Bruce Momjian
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Bruce Momjian
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Vince Vielhaber
• 15:09   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Bruce Momjian
• 15:37   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Bruce Momjian
• 18:26   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Keith Parks
• 20:42   update_pg_pwd and AR triggers wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: QUESTION: Replication neil d. quiogue
• 21:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: QUESTION: Replication Ed Loehr
• 22:15   RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock Hiroshi Inoue

22 December 1999

• 02:31   pg_ctl updated Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:05   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Hannu Krosing
• 13:03   TOAST project page wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] TOAST project page Vince Vielhaber
• 16:07   Re: AW: [HACKERS] LONG varsize - how to go on (pgindent) Bruce Momjian
• 16:08   tab size Bruce Momjian
• 17:54   Non-group columns with aggregate functions Ricardo Coelho
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Ed Loehr
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Bruce Momjian
• 19:26   Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Keith Parks
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] Non-group columns with aggregate functions Ricardo Coelho

23 December 1999

• 13:35   empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:00   --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Lamar Owen
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Bruce Momjian
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:21   libpg and remote access rjb@typeline.com (Robert Badaracco)
• 14:21   Foreign Key support rjb@typeline.com (Robert Badaracco)
• 14:21   Cascade on delete rjb@typeline.com (Robert Badaracco)
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Jose Soares
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 15:16   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 15:37   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Tom Lane
• 15:46   Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 15:47   Re: [HACKERS] --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Tom Lane
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] --with-mb=SQL_ASCII for 6.5.3 RPMs. Lamar Owen
• 16:45   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Ed Loehr
• 19:44   Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 19:57   RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 20:12   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate Tom Lane
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane

24 December 1999

• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] empty concatenate D'Arcy" "J.M." Cain
• 00:34   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 02:00   Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 02:01   Announcing PostgreSQL 6.5.3-3 and 6.5.3-3nl RPMs. Lamar Owen
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Bruce Momjian
• 03:12   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane
• 03:16   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:27   Replication Damond Walker
• 06:56   RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Mount
• 07:31   RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Mount
• 07:33   RE: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Peter Mount
• 07:53   Is there a tool to get at old/deleted tuples ? Hannu Krosing
• 08:03   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Michael Meskes
• 09:55   Error "vacuum pg_proc" Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
• 13:08   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane
• 13:29   database replication DWalker@black-oak.com
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] T-O-A-S-T meaning Thomas Lockhart
• 13:54   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votest Bruce Momjian
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 14:56   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Oleg Broytmann
• 15:24   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Tom Lane
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Vince Vielhaber
• 19:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed Peter Eisentraut
• 19:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: initdb.sh fixed7 Peter Eisentraut
• 19:40   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Peter Eisentraut
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Bruce Momjian
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ed Loehr

25 December 1999

• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Marc G. Fournier
• 01:09   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Damond Walker
• 01:29   ǧìûÖ®Äê´ó·îËÍ Ë«Ï²ÁÙÃŵ½Íõ³¯ 
• 10:56   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 13:34   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ryan Kirkpatrick
• 23:36   dubious improvement in new psql Tom Lane
• 23:51   question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Kevin Lam

26 December 1999

• 12:18   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Damond Walker
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format votes Thomas Lockhart
• 19:22   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane
• 23:06   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Ryan Kirkpatrick

27 December 1999

• 00:33   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian
• 01:24   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian
• 02:16   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane
• 02:21   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Tom Lane
• 03:31   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Bruce Momjian
• 04:51   Re: question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Dmitry
• 05:49   ecpg enhance patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 07:06   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Hannu Krosing
• 07:24   Explain plan output Ansley, Michael
• 07:24   Unlimited query length - The final chapter (part II) Ansley, Michael
• 07:24   Unlimited query length - the final chapter (aka pg_dump) Ansley, Michael
• 07:43   AW: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:35   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Michael Robinson
• 10:55   memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:09   Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc" Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
• 11:12   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus
• 11:22   pg_dump update Ansley, Michael
• 11:29   Logfile rotation Matthew Hagerty
• 11:41   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:37   RE: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Ansley, Michael
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Tom Lane
• 13:37   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch Michael Meskes
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] Unlimited query length - the final chapter (aka pg_dump) Bruce Momjian
• 13:45   Re: [PATCHES] Unlimited query length - The final chapter (part II) Bruce Momjian
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Explain plan output Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Tom Lane
• 14:15   Re: [HACKERS] Logfile rotation Tom Lane
• 15:37   RE: [HACKERS] Explain plan output Ansley, Michael
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus
• 16:27   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Aaron J. Seigo

28 December 1999

• 00:14   RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Marc G. Fournier
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] ecpg enhance patch Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Thomas Lockhart
• 05:25   can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:46   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] RE: What database i can use? (fwd) Don Baccus
• 11:19   Re: [HACKERS] memory dilemma Don Baccus
• 11:45   LZTEXT is removed wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:20   Re: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Tom Lane
• 20:13   Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 21:37   Re: [BUGS] INET operators and NOT Tom Lane
• 23:55   RE: [HACKERS] can't link libpq.so(inet_aton() not found) Hiroshi Inoue

29 December 1999

• 00:56   Index Puzzle for you Kristofer Munn
• 03:51   Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Tom Lane
• 05:14   Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Kristofer Munn
• 08:17   Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Bruce Momjian
• 11:03   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 11:33   PL/pgSQL install procedure Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:55   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 12:34   subquery performance and EXISTS Bruce Momjian
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] Index Puzzle for you Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 13:49   Re: [SQL] Index scan on CIDR field ? Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane
• 14:10   Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Tom Lane
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Bruce Momjian
• 17:22   revoke/grant rights issue svn
• 17:52   Using aggregate in HAVING Bruce Momjian
• 18:19   Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Mike Mascari
• 18:27   Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Bruce Momjian
• 18:53   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 18:59   Re: [HACKERS] Using aggregate in HAVING Mike Mascari
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Bruce Momjian
• 20:00   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: subquery performance and EXISTS Tom Lane
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 20:57   correlated subquery Bruce Momjian
• 21:03   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Tom Lane
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery sszabo@bigpanda.com
• 22:02   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 22:53   Re: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Bruce Momjian

30 December 1999

• 04:31   Source code format vote Bruce Momjian
• 05:50   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Theo Kramer
• 06:15   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote J. Roeleveld
• 07:22   RE: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Ansley, Michael
• 08:10   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Adriaan Joubert
• 09:20   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Theo Kramer
• 11:02   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Stephen Birch
• 11:18   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Stephen Birch
• 11:31   Re: [HACKERS] database replication Duane Currie
• 11:44   AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:07   Re: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Tom Lane
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Tom Lane
• 14:44   HEAP_MOVED_IN error during vacuum? Stephen Birch
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Bruce Momjian
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian
• 19:08   RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Lamar Owen
• 23:50   Is backend-libpq's "PQexec/PQfn/portal" code dead? Tom Lane

31 December 1999

• 00:05   Re: [HACKERS] HEAP_MOVED_IN error during vacuum? Tom Lane
• 01:37   Re: [HACKERS] Is backend-libpq's "PQexec/PQfn/portal" code dead? Bruce Momjian
• 03:54   LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Tom Lane
• 05:01   When are subqueries needed Bruce Momjian
• 06:40   AW: AW: [HACKERS] correlated subquery Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 10:50   Happy New Year! Vadim Mikheev
• 11:31   Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! The Hermit Hacker
• 12:51   Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Vince Vielhaber
• 12:58   Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Andreas Degert
• 13:15   How you can put over 20 GB on a single CD! Sören Kreimeier
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! The Hermit Hacker
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Peter Mount
• 16:52   Re: [HACKERS] LIKE fixed(?) for non-ASCII collation orders Bruce Momjian