Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
Date
Msg-id m11vA6x-0003kGC@orion.SAPserv.Hamburg.dsh.de
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL
List pgsql-hackers
Tom Lane wrote:

> Kyle Bateman <kyle@actarg.com> writes:
> > [ wish list ]
> >   - Get rid of size restrictions on queries (16K)
> >   - Could a subquery be included in the target list of a query
> >     select a,(select b from c) from d where e = f;
> >     (Not sure if this one is even standard SQL.)
>
> FWIW, the above two things are already done in current sources.

Uh,

    who did the latter one?

    Just  running  some  qry  through  psql  I  see that it works
    partially.  Especially I see a

        ExecSetParamPlan: more than one tuple returned by expression subselect

    So I assume it's not implemented in the form I outlined - the
    subselecting  range  table  entry. I'll take a look at it the
    next  days  and  maybe  complain  about  that  change  if  it
    interferes  with  the  needs  of  the  rule  system  to  make
    aggregate, distinct, group by, sort  by  and  all  the  other
    (long wanted) view stuff possible.


Jan

--

#======================================================================#
# It's easier to get forgiveness for being wrong than for being right. #
# Let's break this rule - forgive me.                                  #
#========================================= wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck) #

pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Lincoln Yeoh
Date:
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] Oft Ask: How to contribute to PostgreSQL?
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL