Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about? - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?
Date
Msg-id 199912110244.VAA11673@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:
> 
> > The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> > maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> > Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> > which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> > But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.
> 
> ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
> LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

We have an LDFLAGS, but this for using ld to generate SUBSYS.o.  Not to
be used in normal ld linking use.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql
Next
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Error in new psql