Thread: OK, what's this LDREL all about?

OK, what's this LDREL all about?

From
Tom Lane
Date:
The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.
        regards, tom lane


Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
> The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.

Fixed.  CVS update.
--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?

From
Peter Eisentraut
Date:
On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:

> The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.

ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




Re: [HACKERS] OK, what's this LDREL all about?

From
Bruce Momjian
Date:
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> On 1999-12-10, Tom Lane mentioned:
> 
> > The recent QNX patches have broken current sources.  I think
> > maybe the patches were incomplete or were not applied fully.
> > Every makefile now has $(LD) $(LDREL) in place of $(LD) -r,
> > which would be cool if only LDREL were defined as -r someplace.
> > But it ain't defined anywhere.  Major lossage ensues.
> 
> ISTM, the proper way to do this sort of thing would be to add it to
> LDFLAGS in Makefile.global.

We have an LDFLAGS, but this for using ld to generate SUBSYS.o.  Not to
be used in normal ld linking use.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026