> > I planned to use as many of PostgreSQL data structures unaltered as
> > possible. Storing one Tuple in multiple Items should not pose too much
> > danger on bufmgr and smgr unless they access tuple internals. (I didn't
> > check that yet). This would mean that on disk Items do no longer
> > correspond to Tuples. (Some of them might form one tuple).
> >
>
> Hmm,we have discussed about LONG.
> Change by LONG is transparent to users and would resolve
> the big tuple problem mostly.
> I'm suspicious that tuple chaining is worth the work now.
>
> At least a consensus is needed before going,I think.
> Bad design would only introduce a confusion.
Agreed.
-- Bruce Momjian | http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us | (610)
853-3000+ If your life is a hard drive, | 830 Blythe Avenue + Christ can be your backup. | Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
