Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce) - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Date
Msg-id 27022.944668952@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)  (Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu>)
Responses Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
List pgsql-hackers
Thomas Lockhart <lockhart@alumni.caltech.edu> writes:
>> Kind of like a simple semaphore. Isn't that what you are getting at?

> LISTEN/NOTIFY might be useful for this...

LISTEN/NOTIFY would be one of the things we were trying to *test*.
It's not helpful for checking intra-transaction-block behavior anyway,
since notifys are only sent at commit and only heard between
transactions.

I like the tcl/expect idea a lot.  We'd have to upgrade our tcl
interface to support asynchronous queries (ie, send query then do other
stuff until answer arrives); AFAIR it can't handle that now.  But that'd
be well worth doing anyway...
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Thomas Lockhart
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel regress tests (was Re: FOREIGN KEY andshift/reduce)
Next
From: Kyle Bateman
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Raising funds for PostgreSQL