Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies
Date
Msg-id 199912090255.VAA03055@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to More initdb follies  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
> Question 3: Is there a reason why the template1 database is vacuumed twice
> in the process? Once before all the views are created (no analyze) and
> once at the very end (with analyze).

I see the line before the first vacuum:

# If the COPY is first, the VACUUM generates an error, so we vacuum first

That may have been me adding this.  Seems it is no longer an issue. 
Removed.



--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle maillist@candle.pha.pa.us            |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] More initdb follies
Next
From: Bruce Momjian
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Table aliases in delete statements?