Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Tom Lane
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock
Date
Msg-id 2535.945588476@sss.pgh.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Re: [PATCHES] Lock  (Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
Brook Milligan <brook@biology.nmsu.edu> writes:
> Somehow there has to be a mechanism for atomically asserting locks on
> more than one table.

(scratches head reflectively...)  y'know, thirty years ago there were
a bunch of smart people writing PhD theses about this type of issue.
I've got to think it's been a solved problem for a long time.  Seems
like someone should go spend a long afternoon in a university library
and dig up the answer.
        regards, tom lane


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Brook Milligan
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] SPI header dependencies
Next
From: "Hiroshi Inoue"
Date:
Subject: RE: [HACKERS] NOTICE: LockRelease: locktable lookup failed, no lock