Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Hannu Krosing
Subject Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG
Date
Msg-id 3852A475.2361E57B@tm.ee
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG  (wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck))
List pgsql-hackers
Jan Wieck wrote:
> 
> Peter Eisentraut wrote:
> 
> > Please don't forget, this would require changes to pg_dump and psql. Also,
> > the COPY command might not be able to get away without changes, either.
> 
>     Oh yes, thanks. That was a point I forgot!
> 
>     Psql must not list tables that begin with "_LONG" on  the  \d
>     request.  Anything else should IMHO be transparent.
> 

If this is the main concern then start them with "pg_L_" and they will be 
ignored by the current implementation as well.

But of corse they will surface ad \dS , which may or may not be a good thing
as it makes it possible to list them without changing psql.

-----------
Hannu


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] 6.6 release
Next
From: Hannu Krosing
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Last thoughts about LONG