Mailing lists [pgsql-hackers]

1 January 2000

• 01:22   Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 03:11   Re: [HACKERS] Happy New Year! Vince Vielhaber
• 06:41   HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum? Stephen Birch
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Don Baccus
• 16:49   Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Tom Lane
• 17:04   Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Ed Loehr
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Don Baccus
• 22:27   pgsql y2k bug? Ed Loehr
• 23:44   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? Bruce Momjian

2 January 2000

• 00:01   Is DATEDEBUG useful Bruce Momjian
• 00:07   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? Tom Lane
• 00:12   Re: [HACKERS] pgsql y2k bug? Bruce Momjian
• 16:03   Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Tom Lane
• 21:55   CVS problems Ansley, Michael
• 22:37   Docs Ansley, Michael
• 22:37   RE: [HACKERS] CVS problems Ansley, Michael
• 22:52   RE: [HACKERS] Docs Vince Vielhaber
• 22:55   Re: [HACKERS] Docs Bruce Momjian

3 January 2000

• 04:28   Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test Tom Lane
• 05:00   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Thomas Lockhart
• 05:06   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Tom Lane
• 05:17   Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Thomas Lockhart
• 05:33   Re: Is DATEDEBUG useful Thomas Lockhart
• 05:38   Re: [HACKERS] Docs Thomas Lockhart
• 05:57   Re: [HACKERS] Docs Ed Loehr
• 06:12   Re: [HACKERS] Docs Thomas Lockhart
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] Hmm, almost-a-Y2K-bug in abstime regression test Thomas Lockhart
• 10:23   RE: [HACKERS] Docs Ansley, Michael
• 11:17   date/time type changes Bruce Momjian
• 11:25   Contributors wanted wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 11:34   scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 12:47   pg_dump wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:22   Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY Tom Lane
• 13:32   Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 13:37   Re: date/time type changes Thomas Lockhart
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY Thomas Lockhart
• 13:43   Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] scanner/parser for FOREIGN KEY Bruce Momjian
• 14:52   Re: [PORTS] RPMS on PostgreSQL.org updated. Lamar Owen
• 16:19   Re: [HACKERS] Docs Ed Loehr
• 16:35   Index toasting (was: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc") Jan Wieck
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Stephen Birch
• 17:38   replicator Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 19:01   Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Lamar Owen
• 19:59   Re: Index toasting (was: Re: [HACKERS] Error "vacuum pg_proc") Don Baccus
• 20:37   RE: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Ansley, Michael
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Hannu Krosing
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Hannu Krosing
• 21:21   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Jan Wieck
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Vince Vielhaber
• 22:22   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote The Hermit Hacker
• 23:20   Re: [HACKERS] replicator Philippe Marchesseault
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Stephen Birch

4 January 2000

• 00:21   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 00:35   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote The Hermit Hacker
• 00:40   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker
• 03:11   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Bruce Momjian
• 05:15   Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Thomas Lockhart
• 05:19   Re: [HACKERS] Docs Thomas Lockhart
• 06:30   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Norman Widders
• 06:37   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Hannu Krosing
• 07:11   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Joe Brenner
• 07:12   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Theo Kramer
• 08:25   Re: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Vince Vielhaber
• 10:28   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Jan Wieck
• 11:20   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker
• 12:25   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker
• 12:26   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Don Baccus
• 12:45   Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Thomas Lockhart
• 13:29   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Jose Soares
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] replicator Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:24   Regression tests Thomas Lockhart
• 15:17   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Don Baccus
• 15:43   Error compiling 6.5.3 on Solaris 2.7/x86 with Sun C compiler 5.0 pgsql-hackers@thewrittenword.com
• 16:08   Re: [BUGS] Date calc bug Olivier PRENANT
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Jan Wieck
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian
• 17:55   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 17:55   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Bruce Momjian
• 18:07   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Don Baccus
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Don Baccus
• 19:09   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker
• 19:38   RE: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Ansley, Michael
• 19:51   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Opensource Bruce Momjian
• 19:52   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 20:24   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Don Baccus
• 20:24   RE: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Ansley, Michael
• 20:49   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Jan Wieck
• 20:55   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Stephen Birch
• 21:12   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source The Hermit Hacker
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 21:45   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 21:49   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Scott Beasley
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 21:50   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Jan Wieck
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Bruce Momjian
• 22:23   Thomas! FOREIGN KEY problem! Jan Wieck
• 22:26   Re: [HACKERS] Inprise/Borland releasing Interbase as Open source Scott Beasley
• 22:31   Re: [HACKERS] What does explain show ? Tom Lane

5 January 2000

• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Thomas Lockhart
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: date/time type changes Bruce Momjian
• 04:57   Y2K glitch in pgsql mail list archives Tom Lane
• 05:38   RE: [HACKERS] Index corruption Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:38   RE: [HACKERS] What does explain show ? Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Adriaan Joubert
• 10:00   ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:11   Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number J. Roeleveld
• 11:56   Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Oliver Elphick
• 12:06   Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 12:37   Re: [HACKERS] Index corruption Jan Wieck
• 13:57   Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Hannu Krosing
• 14:43   InterBase interview on Linux Journal Lamar Owen
• 15:22   Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal Thomas Lockhart
• 16:02   Re: ECPG documentation Thomas Lockhart
• 16:04   Re: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 16:22   Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal The Hermit Hacker
• 17:40   Re: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal Bruce Momjian
• 17:42   My response/comments to Inbase Interview ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:52   RE: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Ansley, Michael
• 18:37   RE: [HACKERS] InterBase interview on Linux Journal Ansley, Michael
• 22:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ECPG documentation Stephen Birch

6 January 2000

• 02:25   Proposed cleanup of index-related planner estimation procedures Tom Lane
• 03:09   UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... The Hermit Hacker
• 03:25   Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... Mike Mascari
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... The Hermit Hacker
• 04:53   Regression tests Thomas Lockhart
• 08:05   RE: [HACKERS] Source code format vote Peter Mount
• 09:06   Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... Vince Vielhaber
• 09:08   RE: [HACKERS] ordinal decimal number Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 10:50   Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin
• 11:15   Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... The Hermit Hacker
• 12:13   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 12:40   btree: failed to add item to Adam Walczykiewicz
• 13:10   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to Jan Wieck
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] UdmSearch: tables vs indices ... Tom Lane
• 13:58   New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker
• 14:08   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Brian E Gallew
• 14:10   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Oleg Broytmann
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Tom Lane
• 14:43   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker
• 14:44   Re: [HACKERS] btree: failed to add item to Tom Lane
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin
• 15:10   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 15:33   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed cleanup of index-related planner estimation procedures Bernard Adrian Frankpitt
• 16:13   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 16:21   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 16:35   Still investigating, but ... CREATE INDEX problem in v6.5.x ... The Hermit Hacker
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Thomas Lockhart
• 17:03   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 17:19   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Bruce Momjian
• 18:27   vacuum problem Patrick Welche,SCC,ext.35710,
• 18:30   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Ed Loehr
• 18:31   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Ed Loehr
• 18:45   Re: [GENERAL] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Ed Loehr
• 18:48   pg_dumpall prob Patrick Welche,SCC,ext.35710,
• 19:02   Re: [HACKERS] Thomas! FOREIGN KEY problem! Jan Wieck
• 19:18   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dumpall prob Bruce Momjian
• 19:22   RE: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Ansley, Michael
• 19:30   Re: [GENERAL] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 20:56   pg_dump problem Patrick Welche,SCC,ext.35710,
• 21:22   RE: [HACKERS] pg_dump problem Ansley, Michael
• 21:30   [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Hannu Krosing
• 22:05   RE: [HACKERS] Proposed cleanup of index-related planner estimation procedures Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 22:12   RE: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Don Baccus
• 22:24   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] The Hermit Hacker
• 22:25   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 22:47   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen

7 January 2000

• 01:23   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Bruce Momjian
• 01:26   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 02:03   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL The Hermit Hacker
• 04:39   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with InformixSQL Thomas Lockhart
• 04:49   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Thomas Lockhart
• 05:16   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Thomas Lockhart
• 05:22   RE: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Ansley, Michael
• 05:27   (OT) Linux limits Thomas Lockhart
• 06:08   Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits neil d. quiogue
• 06:12   Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits neil d. quiogue
• 06:13   please help Shanthala Rao
• 07:15   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Adriaan Joubert
• 09:01   Re: [HACKERS] SQL outer join syntax Rod Chamberlin
• 09:19   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin
• 09:22   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Vince Vielhaber
• 10:56   Inheritance Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
• 11:00   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch The Hermit Hacker
• 12:25   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Thomas Lockhart
• 12:35   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 12:47   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Rod Chamberlin
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] New Search Engine ... UdmSearch Adriaan Joubert
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits Thomas Lockhart
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance Tom Lane
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Hannu Krosing
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits Lamar Owen
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits Lamar Owen
• 13:49   Re: [HACKERS] (OT) Linux limits The Hermit Hacker
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] SQL outer join syntax Bruce Momjian
• 14:43   [HACKERS] make JDBC postgresql.jar error Allan Huffman
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Bruce Momjian
• 15:01   .,.IF AOL WAS A CAR..,, WalterChristler@ypvwuactgu.gov.tht.net
• 15:16   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Bruce Momjian
• 15:18   Re: [HACKERS] make JDBC postgresql.jar error Brian P Millett
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 16:51   Re: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Don Baccus
• 18:44   Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" The Hermit Hacker
• 19:03   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] darcy@druid.net (D'Arcy J.M. Cain)
• 19:06   Re: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" Bruce Momjian
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" The Hermit Hacker
• 19:17   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] The Hermit Hacker
• 19:21   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Lamar Owen
• 19:31   Re: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" Bruce Momjian
• 19:59   Re: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" The Hermit Hacker
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" Bruce Momjian
• 20:22   RE: [HACKERS] SQL outer join syntax Ansley, Michael
• 21:36   RE: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] Table drop that fails ... "No such file or directory" Mike Mascari

8 January 2000

• 00:51   Re: [HACKERS] [Fwd: Re: First Major Open Source Database] Thomas Lockhart
• 03:38   Historical trivia (was Re: First Major Open Source Database) Tom Lane
• 04:53   Re: [HACKERS] Historical trivia (was Re: First Major Open Source Database) Bruce Momjian
• 04:59   Costs: Index vs Non-Index The Hermit Hacker
• 05:04   ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Ed Loehr
• 05:14   Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Ed Loehr
• 05:18   Another index "buglet"? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:00   ECPG patch for exec sql ifdef etc. Michael Meskes
• 14:01   MAKE MONEY AT HOME HEALTH&MONEY$!!!
• 14:04   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Tom Lane
• 14:11   Re: [HACKERS] ECPG patch for exec sql ifdef etc. Bruce Momjian
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Costs: Index vs Non-Index Tom Lane
• 14:24   Re: [HACKERS] Another index "buglet"? Tom Lane
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Ed Loehr
• 17:00   Re: [HACKERS] Costs: Index vs Non-Index The Hermit Hacker
• 17:06   Re: [HACKERS] Another index "buglet"? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:08   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Tom Lane
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] Another index "buglet"? Tom Lane
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] Another index "buglet"? The Hermit Hacker
• 19:16   LIBPQ patches ... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:29   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Bruce Momjian
• 19:54   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Tom Lane
• 20:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Ed Loehr
• 20:38   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... The Hermit Hacker
• 20:58   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Tom Lane
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Alfred Perlstein
• 21:48   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Ed Loehr
• 22:01   Postgresql Perl Problem HydroMan
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Alfred Perlstein

9 January 2000

• 00:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: out of free buffers: time to abort ! Tom Lane
• 01:18   Table locking ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] Table locking ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:55   A Markup Database Interface; Borrowing from Groves Clark C. Evans
• 02:22   Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Tom Lane
• 05:16   VACUUM VERBOSE ... The Hermit Hacker
• 06:08   New scheme for managing regress test result files Tom Lane
• 06:21   Re: [HACKERS] New scheme for managing regress test result files The Hermit Hacker
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] "ExecInitIndexScan: both left and right..." meaning? Ed Loehr
• 10:47   postmaster.c postgres.c pg_ctl etc. updated Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:09   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Don Baccus
• 13:40   Re: [HACKERS] New scheme for managing regress test result files Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Tom Lane
• 14:18   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ... Tom Lane
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Bruce Momjian
• 16:53   Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case Stephen Birch
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... The Hermit Hacker
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] VACUUM VERBOSE ... The Hermit Hacker
• 19:34   Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case Tom Lane

10 January 2000

• 01:00   RE: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:23   Re: Postgres Features for 7.X Bruce Momjian
• 02:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case Tom Lane
• 02:36   Number of index fields configurable Bruce Momjian
• 02:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case Tom Lane
• 02:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres Features for 7.X Tom Lane
• 03:04   RE: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres Features for 7.X Bruce Momjian
• 03:19   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Bruce Momjian
• 03:25   oid8in and int28in Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Tom Lane
• 04:33   Cache invalidation was changed a little Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re:HEAP_MOVED_IN during vacuum - test case Stephen Birch
• 07:05   RE: [HACKERS] make JDBC postgresql.jar error Peter Mount
• 12:12   Shared library version Oliver Elphick
• 12:15   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Bruce Momjian
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version Bruce Momjian
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Tom Lane
• 13:23   Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version Tom Lane
• 13:39   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Bruce Momjian
• 13:44   Potential vacuum bug? Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Bruce Momjian
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Tom Lane
• 14:09   Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Vince Vielhaber
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] Number of index fields configurable Bruce Momjian
• 14:27   oid8/int28 Bruce Momjian
• 14:47   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Karl DeBisschop
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:11   Number of args to a function configurable Bruce Momjian
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Don Baccus
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Lamar Owen
• 16:39   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Karl DeBisschop
• 16:53   Changing oidvector length Bruce Momjian
• 17:23   RE: [HACKERS] Shared library version Ansley, Michael
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Don Baccus
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Don Baccus
• 18:10   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Stephen Birch
• 18:50   cvs tree is broken Bruce Momjian
• 21:12   initdb fixed Bruce Momjian
• 22:30   Re: [HACKERS] oid8/int28 Tom Lane
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] Changing oidvector length Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: [HACKERS] Changing oidvector length Tom Lane
• 23:31   Re: [HACKERS] Changing oidvector length Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   RE: [HACKERS] Potential vacuum bug? Hiroshi Inoue

11 January 2000

• 00:27   Re: [HACKERS] Changing oidvector length Tom Lane
• 00:49   Re: [HACKERS] Changing oidvector length Bruce Momjian
• 03:34   zeros in oidvector type Bruce Momjian
• 03:55   Re: zeros in oidvector type Tom Lane
• 04:03   INDEX_MAX_KEYS = 16 ... it works, too Tom Lane
• 06:27   Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version Michael Meskes
• 07:41   Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version Oliver Elphick
• 08:47   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Mateus Cordeiro Inssa
• 09:41   Re: zeros in oidvector type Bruce Momjian
• 11:27   Re: [HACKERS] Regression tests Peter Eisentraut
• 11:27   Who fried this? Peter Eisentraut
• 11:27   Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version Peter Eisentraut
• 12:22   Re: [HACKERS] Shared library version Vince Vielhaber
• 12:54   Re: zeros in oidvector type Tom Lane
• 13:06   Re: [HACKERS] Who fried this? Tom Lane
• 13:14   Re: [SQL] createdb -D xxxx not working Tom Lane
• 13:27   Re: [HACKERS] Simmultanous Connections (fwd) Don Baccus
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] Potential vacuum bug? Tom Lane
• 13:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] createdb -D xxxx not working Thomas Lockhart
• 14:33   Re: [HACKERS] Who fried this? Bruce Momjian
• 14:58   Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Tom Lane
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   AW: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:54   AW: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 16:52   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Bruce Momjian
• 20:26   Re: [HACKERS] Historical trivia (was Re: First Major Open Source Database) Paul M. Aoki
• 20:29   CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Oliver Elphick
• 21:35   psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Brook Milligan
• 22:01   RE: [HACKERS] Potential vacuum bug? Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:04   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Bruce Momjian
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Tom Lane

12 January 2000

• 00:36   bug in 6.5.3... Don Baccus
• 01:06   patch re-added Bruce Momjian
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Peter Eisentraut
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Peter Eisentraut
• 01:31   Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Peter Eisentraut
• 01:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] createdb -D xxxx not working Peter Eisentraut
• 03:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Tom Lane
• 03:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Bruce Momjian
• 04:15   Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Tom Lane
• 04:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Tom Lane
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] bug in 6.5.3... Tom Lane
• 04:43   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Tom Lane
• 05:02   Re: INDEX_MAX_KEYS = 16 ... it works, too Tom Lane
• 05:50   BlowAwayRelationBuffers Adriaan Joubert
• 06:26   Re: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Tom Lane
• 06:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Adriaan Joubert
• 06:43   Re: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Adriaan Joubert
• 06:58   RE: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:23   postgresql installation Netra systems
• 08:32   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Oliver Elphick
• 08:51   Re: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Alfred Perlstein
• 09:20   Re: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Adriaan Joubert
• 10:24   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Oliver Elphick
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:20   PostgreSQL performance problems: heavy load dLux
• 13:14   FETCH without FROM/IN Michael Meskes
• 13:19   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Brook Milligan
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] CREATE TABLE ... PRIMARY KEY kills backend Tom Lane
• 13:42   Re: [Fwd: Help Me] Thomas Lockhart
• 13:47   TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Tom Lane
• 14:09   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Tom Lane
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" The Hermit Hacker
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] createdb -D xxxx not working Thomas Lockhart
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Thomas Lockhart
• 14:53   Re: postgresql installation Cory Kempf
• 15:21   AW: [HACKERS] Enhancing PGSQL to be compatible with Informix SQL Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 16:21   Copy from/to asymmetry Michael Robinson
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Michael Meskes
• 17:12   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Michael Meskes
• 17:24   ... Hideyuki Kawashima
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Peter Eisentraut
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] dubious improvement in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 17:38   psql updates Peter Eisentraut
• 18:54   Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   Informix and OUTER join syntax Bruce Momjian
• 18:54   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Brook Milligan
• 19:05   Re: [HACKERS] psql updates Bruce Momjian
• 19:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Don Baccus
• 20:44   Status request for 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 21:23   Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Peter Eisentraut
• 21:24   proposal -- Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] createdb -D xxxx not working Peter Eisentraut
• 21:53   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 21:58   RE: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:20   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Tom Lane
• 22:52   Re: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers] Bruce Momjian
• 23:03   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated The Hermit Hacker
• 23:11   RE: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Tom Lane
• 23:16   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 23:27   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 23:54   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated The Hermit Hacker
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 23:58   libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Tatsuo Ishii

13 January 2000

• 00:14   RE: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Tom Lane
• 01:06   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 01:10   RE: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 01:39   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 01:40   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Bruce Momjian
• 01:41   Re: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Tom Lane
• 01:52   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:03   RE: [HACKERS] BlowAwayRelationBuffers Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:15   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up SAKAIDA
• 02:43   Re: [HACKERS] Copy from/to asymmetry Thomas Lockhart
• 02:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Thomas Lockhart
• 03:51   Re: [HACKERS] Copy from/to asymmetry Michael Robinson
• 07:23   AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:26   AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:33   AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:54   AW: [HACKERS] Informix and OUTER join syntax Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] Status request for 7.0 Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 08:23   Re: question about MS Access connect to Postgresql 6.5.2-1 Kevin Lam
• 08:41   AW: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:01   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Peter Eisentraut
• 09:12   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 09:16   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 09:21   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 09:24   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Peter Eisentraut
• 09:27   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Michael Meskes
• 09:27   Another item for TODO list Michael Meskes
• 09:30   --enable-multibyte Peter Eisentraut
• 10:42   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated The Hermit Hacker
• 10:43   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated The Hermit Hacker
• 10:54   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 10:55   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 11:20   [HACK]-[INTERFACE] jdbc/postgresql.jar execution errors Allan Huffman
• 11:22   Re: [HACKERS] Another item for TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 11:24   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 11:26   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 11:30   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Peter Eisentraut
• 11:34   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated The Hermit Hacker
• 11:39   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 12:14   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Karl DeBisschop
• 12:34   RE: [HACKERS] [HACK]-[INTERFACE] jdbc/postgresql.jar execution er rors Peter Mount
• 13:16   Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Adam Walczykiewicz
• 13:24   How PG parser search (build-in) function? Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:38   Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Peter Eisentraut
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Don Baccus
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function? Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 14:02   initdb (Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:05   Re: [HACKERS] How PG parser search (build-in) function? Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 14:34   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Tom Lane
• 14:42   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Re: Regress tests reveal *serious* psql bug Adriaan Joubert
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 14:59   Re: initdb (Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated) Tom Lane
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Karl DeBisschop
• 15:11   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 15:20   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated The Hermit Hacker
• 15:27   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Karl DeBisschop
• 15:43   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Karl DeBisschop
• 16:23   Re: [HACKERS] Copy from/to asymmetry Peter Eisentraut
• 16:30   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 16:40   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Tom Lane
• 17:11   FETCH statement again Michael Meskes
• 17:48   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list updated Lamar Owen
• 20:15   Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Oliver Elphick
• 22:47   [hackers]development suggestion needed xun@cs.ucsb.edu (Xun Cheng)
• 23:14   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Bruce Momjian
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Tom Lane
• 23:34   Peter opens a can of worms Tom Lane
• 23:47   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 23:48   Many regress tests failing due to latest psql changes Tom Lane
• 23:57   Re: [HACKERS] --enable-multibyte Tatsuo Ishii

14 January 2000

• 00:02   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Tom Lane
• 00:11   Re: Peter opens a can of worms Tom Lane
• 00:23   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 00:37   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Bruce Momjian
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Bruce Momjian
• 00:43   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 01:25   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Bruce Momjian
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Mike Mascari
• 02:18   SPI_fnumber can't see oid admin
• 02:24   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed The Hermit Hacker
• 02:31   RE: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:32   Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) The Hermit Hacker
• 02:45   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Bruce Momjian
• 02:45   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:02   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:39   RE: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 03:39   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Don Baccus
• 03:39   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 03:39   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 03:40   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Don Baccus
• 03:44   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Don Baccus
• 03:47   RE: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:55   Why must -N be >= 16? The Hermit Hacker
• 03:56   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 03:56   Does SSL code still work after async-connection changes? Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Tom Lane
• 04:05   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS][hackers]development suggestion needed ) Mike Mascari
• 04:23   Re: [HACKERS] Why must -N be >= 16? Tom Lane
• 04:27   Re: [HACKERS] SPI_fnumber can't see oid Tom Lane
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Bruce Momjian
• 04:37   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Bruce Momjian
• 04:38   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Bruce Momjian
• 04:44   RE: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Ansley, Michael
• 04:50   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Michael Meskes
• 04:56   RE: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Ansley, Michael
• 05:39   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH without FROM/IN Tom Lane
• 05:59   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Adriaan Joubert
• 07:09   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Oleg Bartunov
• 08:36   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Malcolm Beattie
• 12:09   locale vs. regress Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Copy from/to asymmetry Thomas Lockhart
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Thomas Lockhart
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] Status request for 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:07   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed The Hermit Hacker
• 13:13   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Tom Lane
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Thomas Lockhart
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 14:41   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 14:42   Re: Multiple Spindles ( Was: Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed ) Don Baccus
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Don Baccus
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 14:42   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Don Baccus
• 16:54   Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs Alfred Perlstein
• 17:13   Re: [HACKERS] Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs admin
• 17:22   Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Stephen Birch
• 17:41   RE: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Ansley, Michael
• 17:46   RE: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Ansley, Michael
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs Alfred Perlstein
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs The Hermit Hacker
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Brian E Gallew
• 18:58   Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Jeff MacDonald
• 19:36   FW: licensing and support Keith Harmon
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Oliver Elphick
• 20:05   descriptions on operators Peter Eisentraut
• 20:05   Help from a Windows programmer needed! Peter Eisentraut
• 20:19   Re: [HACKERS] psql -f inconsistency with "copy from stdin" Peter Eisentraut
• 20:19   psql variables fixed (?) Peter Eisentraut
• 20:20   pg_pwd Peter Eisentraut
• 20:22   Re: Many regress tests failing due to latest psql changes Peter Eisentraut
• 20:53   Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Lamar Owen
• 21:18   Re: [HACKERS] Uninstalling PostgreSQL ??!! Lamar Owen
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] pg_pwd Bruce Momjian
• 21:34   Re: [HACKERS] descriptions on operators Mike Mascari

15 January 2000

• 00:03   date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... The Hermit Hacker
• 00:18   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Don Baccus
• 01:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Peter opens a can of worms Peter Eisentraut
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] psql variables fixed (?) Thomas Lockhart
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Thomas Lockhart
• 01:14   Re: [HACKERS] Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs Thomas Lockhart
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] psql variables fixed (?) Don Baccus
• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Don Baccus
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Peter opens a can of worms Tom Lane
• 03:52   Re: [HACKERS] libpq+MB/putenv(), getenv() clean up Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:55   Re: [HACKERS] psql variables fixed (?) Tom Lane
• 04:13   Standards (was Re: psql variables fixed (?)) Tom Lane
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] Standards (was Re: psql variables fixed (?)) The Hermit Hacker
• 10:42   pgbench added to contrib Tatsuo Ishii
• 11:44   FreeBSD postgresql doc-HOWTO was: Re: [HACKERS] Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs Alfred Perlstein
• 14:39   Re: [HACKERS] psql variables fixed (?) Ed Loehr
• 16:25   flex Peter Eisentraut
• 16:31   TODO list Peter Eisentraut
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 17:34   Re: [HACKERS] flex Bruce Momjian
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Don Baccus
• 19:45   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Oliver Elphick
• 21:25   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Ed Loehr
• 21:31   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Stephen Birch
• 21:46   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Oliver Elphick
• 22:04   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed Hannu Krosing
• 23:26   Re: [HACKERS] flex Tom Lane
• 23:32   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Tom Lane
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] flex Tom Lane

16 January 2000

• 00:04   I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Tom Lane
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Bruce Momjian
• 00:38   Re: [HACKERS] flex Bruce Momjian
• 01:01   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Bruce Momjian
• 01:20   INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump Mike Mascari
• 02:16   pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 02:24   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Tom Lane
• 02:32   Re: [HACKERS] INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 02:52   Re: [HACKERS] INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump Tom Lane
• 03:26   rules with oid Marc Tardif
• 03:37   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Bruce Momjian
• 03:40   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Bruce Momjian
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Bruce Momjian
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] INDEX_MAX_KEYS and pg_dump Bruce Momjian
• 04:26   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Tom Lane
• 04:45   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Bruce Momjian
• 04:58   Temp Tables: Trying to delete a reldesc... Kristofer Munn
• 05:14   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Tables: Trying to delete a reldesc... Tom Lane
• 05:31   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Tables: Trying to delete a reldesc... Bruce Momjian
• 05:41   SELECT...FOR UPDATE OF class_name Kristofer Munn
• 06:10   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT...FOR UPDATE OF class_name Tom Lane
• 10:00   RE: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Ansley, Michael
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Oliver Elphick
• 13:33   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT...FOR UPDATE OF class_name Kristofer Munn
• 13:45   Credit Card ??????????? Adrian Pach
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Don Baccus
• 14:44   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 15:02   Re: [HACKERS] SELECT...FOR UPDATE OF class_name Tom Lane
• 15:07   Re: psql variables fixed (?) Peter Eisentraut
• 15:12   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Peter Eisentraut
• 16:11   Re: [HACKERS] Problem with foreign keys and inheritance Tom Lane
• 18:15   RE: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Ansley, Michael
• 18:17   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 18:34   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Mike Mascari
• 18:48   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Tom Lane
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] I think we need an explicit parsetree node for CAST Bruce Momjian
• 21:39   docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Alfred Perlstein
• 21:44   Re: [HACKERS] hybrid hash, cont. of development suggestion needed Xun Cheng

17 January 2000

• 00:00   Re: [HACKERS] hybrid hash, cont. of development suggestion needed Tom Lane
• 00:46   Inhterit fix Bruce Momjian
• 01:02   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 01:23   Re: Inhterit fix Tom Lane
• 01:47   Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Tom Lane
• 02:16   RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 02:40   Temp Table Memory Leak Kristofer Munn
• 03:01   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak Tom Lane
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak Kristofer Munn
• 03:35   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Tom Lane
• 03:44   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Peter Eisentraut
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak Tom Lane
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak Bruce Momjian
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Peter Eisentraut
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] flex Peter Eisentraut
• 04:08   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak The Hermit Hacker
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak The Hermit Hacker
• 04:29   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Bruce Momjian
• 04:31   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Bruce Momjian
• 04:32   Re: [HACKERS] Temp Table Memory Leak Bruce Momjian
• 04:38   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] flex Tom Lane
• 04:49   external data sources (e.g. a second RDBMS) Christof Petig
• 04:57   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 05:13   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Tom Lane
• 05:53   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Thomas Lockhart
• 06:09   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Tom Lane
• 06:18   Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h) Thomas Lockhart
• 06:23   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Thomas Lockhart
• 07:21   RE: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:50   Re: [HACKERS] flex Patrick Welche
• 09:08   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Peter Eisentraut
• 09:13   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Peter Eisentraut
• 10:44   Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Oliver Elphick
• 11:06   Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Peter Eisentraut
• 11:52   Auto-lowercasing of column names? Hakan Tandogan
• 12:06   Re: [HACKERS] Auto-lowercasing of column names? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:07   Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Oliver Elphick
• 12:18   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Informix and OUTER join syntax Jose Soares
• 12:22   DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big. Theo Kramer
• 12:25   Re: [HACKERS] Auto-lowercasing of column names? Hakan Tandogan
• 12:35   psql and COPY Oliver Elphick
• 12:36   Re: [HACKERS] DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big. Theo Kramer
• 12:57   Re: [HACKERS] DefineQueryRewrite: rule plan string too big. Theo Kramer
• 13:14   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Jan Wieck
• 13:58   Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Tom Lane
• 14:17   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Bruce Momjian
• 14:19   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h) Bruce Momjian
• 14:21   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Tom Lane
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Thomas Lockhart
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Tom Lane
• 14:36   Re: [HACKERS] RE: Getting rid of setheapoverride (was Re: [COMMITTERS] heap.c) Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] flex Jan Wieck
• 16:37   Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Jan Wieck
• 18:19   Unique constraint for inherited tables Constantin Teodorescu
• 22:00   bugs@postgresql.org? Peter Eisentraut
• 22:09   Re: [HACKERS] bugs@postgresql.org? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Hannu Krosing
• 22:57   How to ignore system indexes Hiroshi Inoue

18 January 2000

• 00:05   plpgsql -record in -record out Adam Walczykiewicz
• 00:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h) Thomas Lockhart
• 00:54   Re: FreeBSD postgresql doc-HOWTO was: Re: [HACKERS] Revised nonblocking patches + quasi docs Thomas Lockhart
• 01:05   multi-byte support broken in current Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Bruce Momjian
• 02:51   RE: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:10   Re: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Bruce Momjian
• 03:11   Re: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Tom Lane
• 03:20   Is pg_dump still broken? Mike Mascari
• 03:43   RE: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:43   RE: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:48   Re: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Bruce Momjian
• 03:52   pg_proc.h changed Tatsuo Ishii
• 04:01   Re: [PATCHES] docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Bruce Momjian
• 04:54   RE: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:54   jdbc question mr_hopkins@earthlink.net (Micheal H.)
• 05:32   Re: [HACKERS] Is pg_dump still broken? Tom Lane
• 07:14   Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:04   FETCH syntax Michael Meskes
• 11:04   Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 11:55   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:09   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Jose Soares
• 12:32   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Thomas Lockhart
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:31   RE: [HACKERS] Help from a Windows programmer needed! Magnus Hagander
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 15:59   patches list Michael Meskes
• 15:59   FETCH syntax Michael Meskes
• 16:09   Re: [HACKERS] How to ignore system indexes Bruce Momjian
• 16:25   Re: [HACKERS] patches list Vince Vielhaber
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Bruce Momjian
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) The Hermit Hacker
• 17:08   Re: [HACKERS] FETCH syntax Bruce Momjian
• 17:10   Re: [PATCHES] docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   Re: [PATCHES] docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Alfred Perlstein
• 17:33   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Dmitry Samersoff
• 17:37   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 17:38   Re: [PATCHES] docs done Re: [HACKERS] LIBPQ patches ... Bruce Momjian
• 17:43   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 18:27   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Dmitry Samersoff
• 18:46   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 20:35   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Tom Lane
• 20:37   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 21:22   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump not in very good shape Peter Eisentraut
• 21:22   Re: [HACKERS] Foreign keys: unexpected result from ALTER TABLE... ADD CONSTRAINT... Peter Eisentraut
• 21:22   Re: [HACKERS] psql and COPY Peter Eisentraut
• 21:22   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list Peter Eisentraut
• 21:32   gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 21:37   Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte support broken in current Peter Eisentraut
• 22:32   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:39   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? The Hermit Hacker
• 22:46   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian
• 23:07   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein
• 23:09   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:34   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:49   Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte support broken in current Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:51   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 23:53   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian

19 January 2000

• 00:05   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 00:15   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Thomas Lockhart
• 00:19   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Thomas Lockhart
• 00:23   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Bruce Momjian
• 00:24   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus
• 00:29   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Don Baccus
• 00:46   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 00:52   Re: [HACKERS] pg_proc.h changed Peter Eisentraut
• 00:52   Date/time types (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog (pg_type.h)) Peter Eisentraut
• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Peter Eisentraut
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte support broken in current Peter Eisentraut
• 00:59   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:09   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 01:22   Re: Date/time types (Re: [HACKERS] Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/src/include/catalog(pg_type.h)) Thomas Lockhart
• 01:22   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 01:43   Status on 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] multi-byte support broken in current Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Tom Lane
• 02:57   Well... Vadim Mikheev
• 03:10   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein
• 05:23   examples not included mr_hopkins@earthlink.net (Micheal H.)
• 06:06   Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Hannu Krosing
• 06:19   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Michael Meskes
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Michael Meskes
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] patches list Michael Meskes
• 06:20   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 06:43   Solaris breakage - lastest CVS Keith Parks
• 06:43   RE: [PATCHES] Patch for Win32 support Magnus Hagander
• 08:24   Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Stephen Birch
• 08:48   AW: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:31   RE: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Peter Mount
• 09:42   RE: [HACKERS] Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Ansley, Michael
• 09:53   Proposed change to the JDBC driver Peter Mount
• 09:58   RE: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath as symlink) Ansley, Michael
• 10:15   RE: [HACKERS] Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Peter Mount
• 11:38   Re: [HACKERS] date/time problem in v6.5.3 and 7.0.0 ... Jose Soares
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] Solaris breakage - lastest CVS Bruce Momjian
• 12:56   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tom Lane
• 13:20   Re: Status on 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:33   Re: Status on 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 13:35   Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Tom Lane
• 13:51   Re: [HACKERS] Daily regression testing via vmware - useful? Tom Lane
• 14:16   Re: [HACKERS] Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:27   (no subject) Sevo Stille
• 14:53   running two servers on one machine Kurt Seel
• 15:25   Re: [HACKERS] Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Bruce Momjian
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] Should cast to CHAR or NUMERIC enforce default length limit? Tom Lane
• 15:44   Re: [HACKERS] running two servers on one machine Tom Lane
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Michael Meskes
• 17:17   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus
• 17:25   pg_dump disaster Patrick Welche
• 18:05   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:13   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Bruce Momjian
• 18:23   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? The Hermit Hacker
• 18:50   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Alfred Perlstein
• 19:07   Re: [HACKERS] [hackers]development suggestion needed (filepath assymlink) Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:31   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:33   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 19:43   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Dmitry Samersoff
• 19:52   Re: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Bruce Momjian
• 20:29   Re: [HACKERS] Cannot compile psql Tom Lane
• 21:15   RE: [HACKERS] Index recreation in vacuum Hiroshi Inoue
• 21:41   initdb problems on Solaris Keith Parks
• 21:56   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Keith Parks
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Tom Lane

20 January 2000

• 01:48   timezone problem? Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:38   PL/Perl -- At LAST!! Mark Hollomon
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] PL/Perl -- At LAST!! Bruce Momjian
• 06:39   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Keith Parks
• 08:05   AW: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:15   Re: AW: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Peter Eisentraut
• 09:18   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Peter Eisentraut
• 09:25   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Peter Eisentraut
• 09:32   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 09:34   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:37   Permissions, update acts same as delete, feature or bug? J. Roeleveld
• 11:27   A notice for too long names Peter Eisentraut
• 11:40   AW: AW: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 13:17   Re: Postgres improvement Bruce Momjian
• 13:21   Re: [HACKERS] A notice for too long names Thomas Lockhart
• 13:22   COPY problems with psql / libpq Oliver Elphick
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Postgres improvement Bruce Momjian
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] gperf anyone? Don Baccus
• 13:53   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 13:56   Re: [HACKERS] A notice for too long names Tom Lane
• 14:03   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Tom Lane
• 14:23   off topic Robert Davis
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Tom Lane
• 14:40   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Patrick Welche
• 14:48   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:49   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Thomas Lockhart
• 14:52   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Vince Vielhaber
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Alfred Perlstein
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Patrick Welche
• 15:31   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Bruce Momjian
• 15:48   Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 15:48   Re: Date/time type Peter Eisentraut
• 15:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 16:07   Code von WINZIP Hopf
• 16:07   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Michael Meskes
• 16:15   Re: [HACKERS] off topic The Hermit Hacker
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 16:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 16:46   pg_dump and foreign keys Oliver Elphick
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Oliver Elphick
• 16:56   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Oliver Elphick
• 17:01   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Bruce Momjian
• 18:28   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Ross J. Reedstrom
• 19:48   Re: [HACKERS] A notice for too long names Peter Eisentraut
• 19:48   Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names Peter Eisentraut
• 19:48   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Peter Eisentraut
• 19:51   Install file Peter Eisentraut
• 19:53   how to for postgres as website backend clyde jones
• 20:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   New INSTALL text file Bruce Momjian
• 20:36   Re: [HACKERS] COPY problems with psql / libpq Tom Lane
• 20:43   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Tom Lane
• 20:47   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Tom Lane
• 20:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names Tom Lane
• 20:54   Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Tom Lane
• 21:01   Re: [HACKERS] New INSTALL text file Mike Mascari
• 21:05   Re: [HACKERS] A notice for too long names Don Baccus
• 21:17   New install doc Vince Vielhaber
• 22:32   Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 22:53   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Mike Mascari
• 23:12   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 23:39   RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:55   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Tatsuo Ishii
• 23:58   vacuum failure in current sources Tom Lane

21 January 2000

• 00:19   Re. [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Xun Cheng
• 00:31   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 00:42   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 00:50   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Bruce Momjian
• 00:54   RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:03   Re: Date/time type Thomas Lockhart
• 01:09   RE: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 01:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 01:52   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum failure in current sources Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 03:10   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Tom Lane
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:41   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 03:44   vacuum timings Bruce Momjian
• 03:50   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Bruce Momjian
• 03:52   Re: vacuum timings Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Paul Schulz
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Tom Lane
• 04:27   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum timings Vadim Mikheev
• 04:41   RE: [HACKERS] vacuum timings Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:50   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum timings Bruce Momjian
• 04:51   Re: [HACKERS] vacuum timings Vadim Mikheev
• 04:58   RE: [HACKERS] vacuum timings Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:09   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 06:39   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Michael Robinson
• 06:42   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Alfred Perlstein
• 06:48   Re: Status on 7.0 Jan Wieck
• 07:32   Re: ODBC drive strange behavior Jose Soares
• 07:32   ODBC drive strange behavior Jose Soares
• 08:30   [INTERFACES] ODBC drive strange behavior Jose Soares
• 08:30   [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC drive strange behavior Jose Soares
• 09:59   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Michael Meskes
• 11:31   Building Documentation under Debian Mark Hollomon
• 11:46   Playing with UPDATEs ... The Hermit Hacker
• 11:51   Re: [HACKERS] Building Documentation under Debian Oliver Elphick
• 11:57   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Brian E Gallew
• 11:58   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster The Hermit Hacker
• 12:06   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Thomas Lockhart
• 12:13   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates The Hermit Hacker
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Robert Davis
• 13:00   Re: [HACKERS] Building Documentation under Debian Thomas Lockhart
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Bruce Momjian
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Playing with UPDATEs ... Thomas Lockhart
• 13:12   Re: [HACKERS] Building Documentation under Debian Thomas Lockhart
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Well... Tatsuo Ishii
• 13:31   Re: Status on 7.0 Bruce Momjian
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Bruce Momjian
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Tom Lane
• 14:12   Re: memory leak???? Thomas Lockhart
• 14:23   Re: [HACKERS] timezone problem? Vince Vielhaber
• 14:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: memory leak???? Tom Lane
• 14:49   Re: Re. [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Don Baccus
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: memory leak???? gary.wolfe
• 15:52   Re: vacuum timings Bruce Momjian
• 16:09   RE: Unable to create tables... Karl DeBisschop
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings The Hermit Hacker
• 17:05   Re: set command Tom Lane
• 17:06   Re: vacuum timings Tom Lane
• 17:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names Patrick Welche
• 17:51   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Dmitry Samersoff
• 17:56   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Bruce Momjian
• 18:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Date/time type Patrick Welche
• 18:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings The Hermit Hacker
• 18:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Date/time type Patrick Welche
• 18:35   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Mike Mascari
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Alfred Perlstein
• 20:02   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Tom Lane
• 20:06   Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster Tom Lane
• 22:12   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings The Hermit Hacker

22 January 2000

• 02:50   Re: vacuum timings Tom Lane
• 03:17   Re: vacuum timings Bruce Momjian
• 04:57   Patch for elog(FATAL)/elog(ERROR) infinite loop? Kristofer Munn
• 05:23   No suitable driver problem mr_hopkins@earthlink.net (Micheal H.)
• 06:16   RE: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Hiroshi Inoue
• 06:29   Re: [HACKERS] Well... Vadim Mikheev
• 06:45   Types Michael Meskes
• 08:57   Re: [HACKERS] Types Oliver Elphick
• 12:00   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Michael Meskes
• 12:00   Re: [HACKERS] Types Michael Meskes
• 12:00   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Michael Meskes
• 12:18   Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris Peter Eisentraut
• 12:19   Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 14:10   Re: [HACKERS] Types Tom Lane
• 14:13   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Tom Lane
• 14:38   Re: [HACKERS] psql updates Tom Lane
• 14:41   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC drive strange behavior Byron Nikolaidis
• 15:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Bruce Momjian
• 15:42   Re: [HACKERS] off topic Bruce Momjian
• 16:19   pglib and long queries Marc Tardif
• 19:37   Explain output Ansley, Michael
• 22:04   Doc updates for index cost estimator change Tom Lane
• 23:23   Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 23:23   Re: [HACKERS] New install doc Peter Eisentraut
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [GENERAL] Variable case database names Peter Eisentraut
• 23:24   Not a number Peter Eisentraut
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] New INSTALL text file Peter Eisentraut
• 23:24   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0 Peter Eisentraut
• 23:37   Re: [HACKERS] New install doc Vince Vielhaber

23 January 2000

• 00:01   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 00:07   foreign keys? Don Baccus
• 00:09   Re: [HACKERS] Well... Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:24   FWIW department - select avg(numeric_value) Don Baccus
• 01:28   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 01:43   Refusing patches Bruce Momjian
• 01:46   char_length()? Tatsuo Ishii
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 01:54   [HELP] - Installing Postgres D Herssein
• 02:17   Re: [HACKERS] char_length()? Tom Lane
• 02:25   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 02:27   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 02:39   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 02:51   pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Alfred Perlstein
• 03:28   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 03:28   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Bruce Momjian
• 03:39   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Alfred Perlstein
• 03:43   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Vince Vielhaber
• 03:54   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Tom Lane
• 03:59   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 04:43   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Alfred Perlstein
• 06:15   Re: [HACKERS] char_length()? Tatsuo Ishii
• 06:19   Re: [HACKERS] foreign keys? acroyear@bigpanda.com
• 07:34   Unique constraint for inherited tables? Constantin Teodorescu
• 07:56   column aliases Bruce Momjian
• 08:06   Re: [HACKERS] Unique constraint for inherited tables? Bruce Momjian
• 10:39   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] foreign keys? Don Baccus
• 13:45   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Tom Lane
• 14:56   Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Jeroen van Vianen
• 15:56   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Tom Lane
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Don Baccus
• 16:28   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Tom Lane
• 16:48   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hannu Krosing
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Tom Lane
• 17:05   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 17:15   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 17:42   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Jeroen van Vianen
• 17:47   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 18:06   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 18:11   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 18:13   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 18:20   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 18:29   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 18:43   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 18:45   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 18:49   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 18:49   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 19:00   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 19:02   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 19:09   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 19:19   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Vince Vielhaber
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 19:24   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 19:29   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 19:44   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 19:49   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 19:59   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hannu Krosing
• 20:07   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 20:14   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hannu Krosing
• 20:20   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Vince Vielhaber
• 20:28   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 20:31   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 20:32   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hannu Krosing
• 22:56   RE: [HACKERS] Patch for elog(FATAL)/elog(ERROR) infinite loop? Hiroshi Inoue
• 23:10   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Alfred Perlstein

24 January 2000

• 00:11   initdb everyone Bruce Momjian
• 01:06   Use of Indicies ... The Hermit Hacker
• 01:27   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Lamar Owen
• 01:53   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Chris Bitmead
• 02:26   RE: [HACKERS] Patch for elog(FATAL)/elog(ERROR) infinite loop? Kristofer Munn
• 02:28   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Tom Lane
• 02:42   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Chris Bitmead
• 02:55   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. (was: Re: [HACKERS] pg_dump disaster) Tom Lane
• 02:56   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 02:56   ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) The Hermit Hacker
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Don Baccus
• 03:22   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 03:27   Re: [HACKERS] Patch for elog(FATAL)/elog(ERROR) infinite loop? Tom Lane
• 03:28   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 03:59   Re: [HACKERS] Use of Indicies ... Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: ORDBMS<->OID (Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Chris Bitmead
• 05:29   TOAST suggestion... Chris Bitmead
• 07:49   AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:58   Re: [HACKERS] Use of Indicies ... Hannu Krosing
• 08:28   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Jeroen van Vianen
• 08:55   AW: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:00   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 09:13   fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Michael Robinson
• 10:16   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 10:34   Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Patrick Welche
• 11:02   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 11:06   Re: [HACKERS] Use of Indicies ... The Hermit Hacker
• 11:27   PQputline failed Tatsuo Ishii
• 12:52   Well, then you keep your darn columns Peter Eisentraut
• 13:07   Re: Doc updates for index cost estimator change Thomas Lockhart
• 13:31   Re: [HACKERS] Implementing STDDEV and VARIANCE Tom Lane
• 13:39   Re: [INTERFACES] Re: ODBC drive strange behavior Jose Soares
• 13:45   unsubscribe Nguyen, Thuan X
• 13:48   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Adriaan Joubert
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Status on 7.0 Thomas Lockhart
• 14:07   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Tom Lane
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Bruce Momjian
• 14:35   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns The Hermit Hacker
• 14:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Doc updates for index cost estimator change Tom Lane
• 14:50   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Tom Lane
• 15:01   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Bruce Momjian
• 15:03   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Bruce Momjian
• 15:04   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Henry B. Hotz
• 15:05   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Bruce Momjian
• 15:12   RE: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hiroshi Inoue
• 15:13   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Michael Robinson
• 15:19   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Bruce Momjian
• 15:26   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 15:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Tom Lane
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Tom Lane
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Bruce Momjian
• 15:36   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver Peter Mount
• 15:48   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Henry B. Hotz
• 15:54   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Tom Lane
• 15:58   AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 15:59   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Patrick Welche
• 16:07   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver Tom Lane
• 16:11   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Brian E Gallew
• 16:12   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Ed Loehr
• 16:14   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 16:18   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 16:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Tom Lane
• 16:21   Re: [HACKERS] Proposed change to the JDBC driver Peter Mount
• 16:31   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Tom Lane
• 16:46   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Tom Lane
• 17:15   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 17:15   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Don Baccus
• 17:26   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   Re: [HACKERS] column aliases Bruce Momjian
• 17:46   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns The Hermit Hacker
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 18:01   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Don Baccus
• 18:02   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 18:02   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 18:05   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 18:25   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns The Hermit Hacker
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Ed Loehr
• 18:26   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns The Hermit Hacker
• 18:27   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 18:33   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 19:03   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Bruce Momjian
• 19:46   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hannu Krosing
• 19:48   RE: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Ansley, Michael
• 19:54   Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Oliver Elphick
• 20:12   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hannu Krosing
• 20:37   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Bruce Momjian
• 20:37   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 20:37   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hannu Krosing
• 20:50   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Hannu Krosing
• 20:56   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hannu Krosing
• 21:03   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hannu Krosing
• 21:16   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Philip Warner
• 21:24   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Chris Bitmead
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Don Baccus
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Alfred Perlstein
• 21:26   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Philip Warner
• 21:32   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Patrick Welche
• 21:36   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Chris Bitmead
• 21:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Patrick Welche
• 21:39   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Chris Bitmead
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] psql updates Peter Eisentraut
• 21:41   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 21:41   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 21:42   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 21:43   Re: [HACKERS] New install doc Peter Eisentraut
• 21:43   Re: [GENERAL] max(oid) Peter Eisentraut
• 21:57   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 21:57   Re: [HACKERS] psql updates Tom Lane
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 22:16   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 22:26   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 23:07   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Alfred Perlstein
• 23:39   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns The Hermit Hacker
• 23:49   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Doc updates for index cost estimator change Thomas Lockhart
• 23:50   DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 23:53   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hiroshi Inoue

25 January 2000

• 00:00   RE: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hiroshi Inoue
• 00:04   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Tatsuo Ishii
• 00:08   Re: [GENERAL] max(oid) Thomas Lockhart
• 00:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Alfred Perlstein
• 00:13   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 00:20   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 00:40   Re: [HACKERS] Re: pg_dump possible fix, need testers. Tom Lane
• 00:44   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Chris Bitmead
• 00:45   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 00:51   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 00:53   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Chris Bitmead
• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 00:55   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Mike Mascari
• 01:04   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Michael Robinson
• 01:04   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner
• 01:06   Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Tom Lane
• 01:12   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Chris Bitmead
• 01:13   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Bruce Momjian
• 01:18   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Mike Mascari
• 01:46   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 01:57   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Bruce Momjian
• 01:58   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 02:02   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 02:06   Cannot flush block 9782 Chairudin Sentosa Harjo
• 02:06   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner
• 02:37   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 02:46   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 02:59   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Tatsuo Ishii
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 03:02   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 03:06   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 03:06   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 03:09   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 03:23   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Don Baccus
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 03:30   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Tom Lane
• 03:39   Oh btw, about XXX Tom Lane
• 04:00   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Michael Robinson
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Chris Bitmead
• 04:13   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 04:41   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 04:42   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:51   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping The Hermit Hacker
• 05:13   RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:16   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Adriaan Joubert
• 05:30   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Mike Mascari
• 05:45   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 05:55   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner
• 06:08   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Oliver Elphick
• 06:18   Re: [HACKERS] Oh btw, about XXX Alfred Perlstein
• 06:22   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 06:30   Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Julian Scarfe
• 07:53   Re: [HACKERS] Re: vacuum timings Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:12   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Michael Meskes
• 08:30   Re: [SQL] Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Peter Eisentraut
• 08:38   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 08:42   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Peter Eisentraut
• 08:55   Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Peter Eisentraut
• 08:59   Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Peter Eisentraut
• 09:01   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Peter Eisentraut
• 12:33   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 12:33   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 12:53   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Brian E Gallew
• 13:39   RE: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:44   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Don Baccus
• 13:46   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 13:47   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 14:05   RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:11   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 14:12   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 14:37   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Ross J. Reedstrom
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 14:59   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Bruce Momjian
• 15:17   Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 15:24   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Tom Lane
• 15:39   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Tom Lane
• 15:45   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:29   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:49   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Tom Lane
• 17:22   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 17:23   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 17:23   Re: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping Don Baccus
• 17:23   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 17:35   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 17:53   Re: Postgresql Perl Problem 
• 18:22   Re: Happy column adding and dropping Ross J. Reedstrom
• 18:33   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Bruce Momjian
• 18:46   Re: Happy column adding and dropping Don Baccus
• 19:48   Re: Happy column adding and dropping Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:00   Re: Happy column adding and dropping Don Baccus
• 20:42   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Bruce Momjian
• 20:44   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Bruce Momjian
• 21:02   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Tom Lane
• 21:08   Column ADDing issues Peter Eisentraut
• 21:08   --enable-debug Peter Eisentraut
• 21:09   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Peter Eisentraut
• 21:09   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Peter Eisentraut
• 21:13   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 21:47   Re: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Don Baccus
• 21:56   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Tom Lane
• 22:11   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Tom Lane
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Tom Lane
• 22:19   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy columndropping) Hannu Krosing
• 22:19   Re: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Henry B. Hotz
• 22:21   Re: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Bruce Momjian
• 22:25   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Hannu Krosing
• 22:41   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy columndropping) Don Baccus
• 22:45   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Oliver Elphick
• 22:50   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hannu Krosing
• 23:02   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happycolumndropping) Hannu Krosing
• 23:07   Re: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Bruce Momjian
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] fatal copy in/out error (6.5.3) Tatsuo Ishii

26 January 2000

• 00:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Happy column adding and dropping Thomas Lockhart
• 01:05   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Happy column adding and dropping Bruce Momjian
• 03:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Happy column adding and dropping Don Baccus
• 03:27   RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Hiroshi Inoue
• 03:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Happy column adding and dropping Bruce Momjian
• 03:48   Many files modified tonight Bruce Momjian
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Tom Lane
• 04:10   Re: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Bruce Momjian
• 06:40   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Hannu Krosing
• 06:54   AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 06:59   AW: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:10   AW: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:16   Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns (oid) Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:21   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Philip Warner
• 07:24   AW: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 07:42   RE: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hiroshi Inoue
• 08:44   AW: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 08:57   RE: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:00   RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Hiroshi Inoue
• 09:14   RE: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Ansley, Michael
• 10:26   AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:09   RE: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Hiroshi Inoue
• 11:23   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Jose Soares
• 11:37   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy columndropping) Jose Soares
• 14:06   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Ross J. Reedstrom
• 15:07   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 16:28   OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Peter Eisentraut
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Peter Eisentraut
• 16:29   Re: Happy column adding Peter Eisentraut
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Peter Eisentraut
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Peter Eisentraut
• 16:30   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Peter Eisentraut
• 16:41   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 17:32   Re: [PATCHES] commit TO_CHAR() Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 17:45   SQL 92 Jeff MacDonald
• 18:22   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Ross J. Reedstrom
• 18:54   Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Don Baccus
• 18:54   RE: [HACKERS] --enable-debug Don Baccus
• 19:08   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Don Baccus
• 19:09   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Don Baccus
• 19:10   Re: Happy column adding (was RE: [HACKERS] Happy column dropping) Don Baccus
• 19:45   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Ricardo Coelho
• 20:24   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner
• 20:35   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 20:39    Fabio Ambrosanio
• 20:57   Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Philip Warner
• 20:57   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Chris Bitmead
• 21:06   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 21:33   Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Bruce Momjian
• 21:41   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Hannu Krosing
• 21:48   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Philip Warner
• 22:00   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Oliver Elphick
• 22:18   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Chris Bitmead
• 22:32   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Chris Bitmead
• 23:20   ORDBMS (Was: Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns)) The Hermit Hacker
• 23:52   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Chris Bitmead

27 January 2000

• 00:06   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Chris Bitmead
• 00:08   Re: ORDBMS (Was: Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darncolumns)) Chris Bitmead
• 00:11   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Henry B. Hotz
• 03:15   Re: [PATCHES] commit TO_CHAR() Thomas Lockhart
• 03:21   Re: [HACKERS] SQL 92 Thomas Lockhart
• 03:40   (libpq) Anyone still having problems with COPY? Alfred Perlstein
• 03:44   Ars Digita and PostgreSQL Chris Bitmead
• 04:57   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Adriaan Joubert
• 05:21   CVS problem Michael Meskes
• 05:43   Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem Tom Lane
• 10:58   Re: ORDBMS Peter Eisentraut
• 11:07   Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Patrick Welche
• 11:11   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Oliver Elphick
• 11:12   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Hannu Krosing
• 11:13   Re: [HACKERS] (libpq) Anyone still having problems with COPY? Patrick Welche
• 11:13   AW: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Zeugswetter Andreas SB
• 11:15   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Hannu Krosing
• 11:15   Re: AW: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Hannu Krosing
• 12:12   Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem Michael Meskes
• 13:38   RE: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:32   RE: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Hiroshi Inoue
• 14:46   Re: [HACKERS] Ars Digita and PostgreSQL Don Baccus
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Peter Eisentraut
• 15:35   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Peter Eisentraut
• 15:53   Re: [SQL] RE: [GENERAL] Problem with SELECT on large negative INT4 Tom Lane
• 15:55   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Bruce Momjian
• 16:05   Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem The Hermit Hacker
• 16:34   Re: [SQL] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Tom Lane
• 16:44   Spinlock error Jeff MacDonald
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Ross J. Reedstrom
• 17:00   Question about functions Michael Meskes
• 17:44   Length of OID Michael Meskes
• 17:44   Re: [HACKERS] CVS problem Michael Meskes
• 18:27   Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock error Tom Lane
• 18:59   Soundex in Postgres? pkeck@coe.uga.edu (Paul Keck)
• 20:17   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Bruce Momjian
• 20:21   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Peter Eisentraut
• 20:21   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Peter Eisentraut
• 20:22   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Peter Eisentraut
• 20:22   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Peter Eisentraut
• 20:22   TODO list check Peter Eisentraut
• 21:03   Orphaned files in the database... Kristofer Munn
• 21:10   Re: [HACKERS] Length of OID Tom Lane
• 22:07   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check Tom Lane
• 22:09   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Chris Bitmead
• 22:14   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Chris Bitmead
• 22:15   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints Chris Bitmead
• 22:51   PostgreSQL 7.0beta Freeze Postponed ... (fwd) The Hermit Hacker
• 23:08   [6.5.3] 'attribute not found' The Hermit Hacker
• 23:08   Re: ORDBMS Chris Bitmead
• 23:19   very minor problem in contrib/dateformat/to-from_char.c Don Baccus
• 23:22   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner
• 23:27   TID clarification Assaf Arkin
• 23:31   Re: [HACKERS] DISTINCT ON: speak now or forever hold your peace Philip Warner

28 January 2000

• 00:28   Backend Core Dumping Kristofer Munn
• 01:11   Re: [HACKERS] Spinlock error Jeff MacDonald
• 01:29   [6.5.2] potentially major bug? The Hermit Hacker
• 01:36   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found' Tom Lane
• 01:44   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Bruce Momjian
• 01:45   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Tom Lane
• 01:49   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check Bruce Momjian
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found' The Hermit Hacker
• 02:10   OR-of-ANDs dragon slain ... or at least seriously wounded ... Tom Lane
• 02:40   Re: [HACKERS] TID clarification Tom Lane
• 02:48   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check Bruce Momjian
• 02:51   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Bruce Momjian
• 02:52   Re: [HACKERS] very minor problem in contrib/dateformat/to-from_char.c Bruce Momjian
• 03:00   Re: [HACKERS] OR-of-ANDs dragon slain ... or at least seriously wounded ... Bruce Momjian
• 03:04   Re: [HACKERS] very minor problem in contrib/dateformat/to-from_char.c Don Baccus
• 03:05   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found' Don Baccus
• 03:20   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Chris Bitmead
• 03:22   ONLY vs "*" Chris Bitmead
• 03:27   Re: OIDS (Re: [HACKERS] Well, then you keep your darn columns) Tom Lane
• 03:38   Can't access CVS Oliver Elphick
• 03:43   RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug? Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:17   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Tom Lane
• 04:25   Re: [HACKERS] ONLY vs "*" Tom Lane
• 04:41   RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug? The Hermit Hacker
• 04:56   RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug? Hiroshi Inoue
• 05:44   RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug? Hiroshi Inoue
• 07:17   Is anoncvs broker Chris
• 08:47   Re: [HACKERS] very minor problem in contrib/dateformat/to-from_char.c Karel Zak - Zakkr
• 09:14   OO and tuples of different types Chris
• 11:18   postgres under gdb Chris
• 12:37   Re: [HACKERS] OO and tuples of different types Tom Lane
• 12:52   Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Tom Lane
• 12:52   Re: ORDBMS The Hermit Hacker
• 13:03   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS The Hermit Hacker
• 13:04   Re: [HACKERS] Column ADDing issues Jose Soares
• 13:09   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Tom Lane
• 13:25   Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found' Thomas Lockhart
• 13:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Thomas Lockhart
• 13:43   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS The Hermit Hacker
• 13:50   Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Thomas Lockhart
• 14:00   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Thomas Lockhart
• 15:00   Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates Tom Lane
• 15:32   Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Bruce Momjian
• 15:32   Bit strings Adriaan Joubert
• 15:34   Re: [HACKERS] postgres under gdb Bruce Momjian
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] Inheritance, referential integrity and other constraints wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 15:44   Bit strings Adriaan Joubert
• 15:46   Copyright Peter Eisentraut
• 15:47   END/ABORT Peter Eisentraut
• 15:52   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Ross J. Reedstrom
• 16:47   Re: [HACKERS] OO and tuples of different types Hannu Krosing
• 16:57   Re: [HACKERS] OO and tuples of different types Hannu Krosing
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Bruce Momjian
• 17:02   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Bruce Momjian
• 17:30   [HACKERS] Trigger drop/create bug? Ed Loehr
• 17:32   Re: [HACKERS] Trigger drop/create bug? Ed Loehr
• 18:55   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus
• 19:10   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Brook Milligan
• 19:14   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus
• 20:05   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Bruce Momjian
• 20:19   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Tom Lane
• 20:22   Old Postgres papers (was Re: [HACKERS] OO and tuples of different types) Ross J. Reedstrom
• 20:41   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Tom Lane
• 21:08   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Ross J. Reedstrom
• 21:33   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner
• 22:32   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Ed Loehr
• 23:44   elog ability for plperl Mark Hollomon
• 23:56   Re: [HACKERS] elog ability for plperl Bruce Momjian
• 23:58   Beta is February 15th Bruce Momjian

29 January 2000

• 00:43   Re: Copyright bruc@stone.congenomics.com (Robert E. Bruccoleri)
• 01:51   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Tatsuo Ishii
• 02:23   Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Roland Roberts
• 03:07   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright The Hermit Hacker
• 03:26   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner
• 03:32   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner
• 03:45   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Bruce Momjian
• 03:55   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Tom Lane
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus
• 04:01   Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Don Baccus
• 04:02   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner
• 04:18   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus
• 04:25   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Philip Warner
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Don Baccus
• 04:36   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus
• 04:52   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Philip Warner
• 04:55   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Thomas Lockhart
• 04:58   Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Thomas Lockhart
• 05:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Tom Lane
• 05:31   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Tom Lane
• 05:33   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Thomas Lockhart
• 05:56   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Tom Lane
• 06:36   Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys Ed Loehr
• 07:40   select count(*) from hits group by count; Oleg Bartunov
• 07:45   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Michael Meskes
• 07:45   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Michael Meskes
• 08:10   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Mike Mascari
• 08:29   Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Oleg Bartunov
• 09:07   GUC (Re: AW: AW: [HACKERS] Some notes on optimizer cost estimates) Peter Eisentraut
• 09:07   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check Peter Eisentraut
• 09:10   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Peter Eisentraut
• 09:30   Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Tatsuo Ishii
• 10:04   Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Oleg Bartunov
• 11:45   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Oleg Broytmann
• 12:39   Locale patch Oleg Broytmann
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Don Baccus
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Don Baccus
• 13:48   RE: [HACKERS] [6.5.2] potentially major bug? Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:59   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check Tom Lane
• 14:00   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Tom Lane
• 14:26   Re: [HACKERS] select count(*) from hits group by count; Tom Lane
• 14:40   RE: [HACKERS] select count(*) from hits group by count; Dmitry Samersoff
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Peter Eisentraut
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Peter Eisentraut
• 14:53   Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Does initdb -e is working ? (Latest dev. snapshot) Peter Eisentraut
• 14:54   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright The Hermit Hacker
• 15:00   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright The Hermit Hacker
• 15:11   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright The Hermit Hacker
• 15:26   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Bruce Momjian
• 15:26   Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check Bruce Momjian
• 15:28   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Bruce Momjian
• 15:29   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) The Hermit Hacker
• 15:38   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Oleg Broytmann
• 15:39   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Oleg Broytmann
• 15:46   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) The Hermit Hacker
• 16:29   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Don Baccus
• 16:38   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Dmitry Samersoff
• 17:11   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Michael Meskes
• 17:18   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Jeff MacDonald
• 17:54   Re: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Tom Lane
• 18:05   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Hannu Krosing
• 18:41   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright The Hermit Hacker
• 18:41   ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Tom Lane
• 18:47   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Bruce Momjian
• 20:52   freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane
• 22:22   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Copyright Ross J. Reedstrom

30 January 2000

• 01:15   RE: ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:16   RE: [HACKERS] Sure enough, SI buffer overrun is broken Hiroshi Inoue
• 01:19   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Bruce Momjian
• 01:50   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane
• 02:19   Re: ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Tom Lane
• 04:04   RE: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Hiroshi Inoue
• 04:33   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane
• 12:44   Re: [HACKERS] Bit strings Adriaan Joubert
• 13:41   Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 16:00   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian
• 16:22   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 17:30   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian
• 18:59   corel9 jo
• 19:54   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 19:57   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian
• 20:20   Case-folding bogosity in new psql Tom Lane
• 20:24   RE: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Ansley, Michael
• 21:19   Re: [HACKERS] Copyright Chris Bitmead
• 21:36   RE: ImmediateSharedRelationCacheInvalidate considered harmful Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:00   RE: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:14   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Chris Bitmead
• 22:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Chris Bitmead
• 22:36   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Chris Bitmead
• 22:38   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Chris Bitmead
• 23:08   Re: [HACKERS] Postgres LOGO(was: Beta is February 15th) Vince Vielhaber
• 23:16   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Bruce Momjian
• 23:52   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 23:55   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane

31 January 2000

• 00:34   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Bruce Momjian
• 02:48   [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr
• 06:53   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:01   Re: [HACKERS] Help with pl/pgsql, triggers, and foreign keys wieck@debis.com (Jan Wieck)
• 08:27   Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS Hannu Krosing
• 10:30   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Peter Eisentraut
• 10:55   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Peter Eisentraut
• 10:58   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Peter Eisentraut
• 11:14   Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 11:40   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker
• 11:42   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Peter Eisentraut
• 12:02   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? The Hermit Hacker
• 12:12   Re: [ADMIN] Attribute 'aggtransfn1' is repeated Peter Vazsonyi
• 12:45   Duplicate index check in btbuild Hiroshi Inoue
• 13:09   Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Tom Lane
• 13:24   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Tom Lane
• 13:26   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql The Hermit Hacker
• 13:29   Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 13:30   Re: [HACKERS] Re: Case-folding bogosity in new psql Peter Eisentraut
• 13:42   Re: [HACKERS] freefuncs.c is never called from anywhere!? Tom Lane
• 13:52   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Tom Lane
• 14:01   Re: [HACKERS] Duplicate index check in btbuild Tom Lane
• 14:30   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr
• 14:31   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr
• 16:23   Re: [HACKERS] END/ABORT Don Baccus
• 16:36   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr
• 17:16   Re: [HACKERS] Another nasty cache problem Patrick Welche
• 18:04   Re: [HACKERS] float4 confused as int?? Ed Loehr
• 19:34   PClabs Survey, Part I: Administration The Hermit Hacker
• 19:36   PCLabs Survey, Part III: Multimedia Data Types The Hermit Hacker
• 19:36   PCLabs Survey, Part IV: Interoperability The Hermit Hacker
• 19:37   PCLabs Survey, Part II: Server Engine The Hermit Hacker
• 19:37   PCLabs Survey, Part V: Programmability The Hermit Hacker
• 19:39   PCLabs Survey, Part VI: Query Language and Database Design The Hermit Hacker
• 19:39   PCLabs Survey, Part VII: Embedded Database / Branch Office Support The Hermit Hacker
• 19:40   PCLabs Survey, Part VIII: Data Warehousing and Reporting The Hermit Hacker
• 19:41   PClabs Survey, Part I: Administration (resend) The Hermit Hacker
• 20:18   Recent RI changes have broken something Oliver Elphick
• 21:00   request for tuning suggestions from PC Week Labs Timothy Dyck
• 21:49   RE: [HACKERS] Duplicate index check in btbuild Hiroshi Inoue
• 22:53   The Apache Model (was Re: Copyright) Philip Warner