Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Peter Eisentraut
Subject Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris
Date
Msg-id Pine.LNX.4.21.0001202302520.349-100000@localhost.localdomain
Whole thread Raw
In response to Re: [HACKERS] initdb problems on Solaris  ("Ross J. Reedstrom" <reedstrm@wallace.ece.rice.edu>)
List pgsql-hackers
On 2000-01-20, Ross J. Reedstrom mentioned:

> Peter - 
> If you're going to look at the id for initdb, please consider the
> NT port as well. This may be more of a problem with cygwin than pgsql,
> but pg_id didn't work correctly, and I had to hack on the initdb script
> to get it to to run, with a 6.5.3 install, recently. 

Oh dear, I just wrote a new pg_id thingy that fulfills all my initdb
wishes (no id, not whoami vs 'who am i', no Solaris stupidities), but
what's now? How does NT/Cygwin handle it? Don't they have a geteuid()
function? Feel free to hack up pg_id to always return 42 in that case.

-- 
Peter Eisentraut                  Sernanders väg 10:115
peter_e@gmx.net                   75262 Uppsala
http://yi.org/peter-e/            Sweden




pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Michael Meskes
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] off topic
Next
From: Peter Eisentraut
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Status on 7.0