Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check - Mailing list pgsql-hackers

From Bruce Momjian
Subject Re: [HACKERS] TODO list check
Date
Msg-id 200001280346.WAA08192@candle.pha.pa.us
Whole thread Raw
In response to TODO list check  (Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>)
List pgsql-hackers
[Charset ISO-8859-1 unsupported, filtering to ASCII...]
> My last run-through before the apocalypse ...
> 
> 
> * Disallow inherited columns with the same name as new columns
> 
> Either this was just not marked off, or there is some misconception about
> how things should work. E.g.,
> create table a (x int);
> create table b (x text) inherits (a);
> will fail, for obvious reasons.
> 
> create table a (x int);
> create table b (x int) inherits (a);
> will not fail, but will create a table b with *one* column x which is the
> one inherited from a. This might be confusing in this context, but what
> about
> 
> create table a (x int);
> create table b (y text) inherits (a);
> create table c (z text) inherits (a);
> create table d (q time) inherits (b, c);
> 
> In this case you must allow this "column merging" to happen, otherwise
> this whole scheme of inheriting would be impossible. So either the above
> item seems done or we prohibit multiple inheritance.

Removed.


> 
> 
> * Do not allow bpchar column creation without length
> 
> peter=> create table foo (a bpchar);
> CREATE
> peter=> \d foo
>          Table "foo"
>  Attribute |  Type   | Extra
> -----------+---------+-------
>  a         | char(1) |
> 
> Looks good to me (and is standard compliant).

Removed.

> 
> 
> * Update table SET table.value = 3 fails(SQL standard says this is OK)
> 
> We agreed that this was definitely not okay by any standard we know of.
> Please remove it.

Removed.

> 
> 
> * SELECT ... UNION ... ORDER BY fails when sort expr not in result list  
> 
> Looks good to me:
> 
> peter=> select * from test1;
>  a | b
> ---+----
>  1 | 11
>  2 | 22
> (2 rows)
>  
> peter=> select * from test2;
>  a | b
> ---+----
>  3 | 33
>  4 | 44
> (2 rows)
>  
> peter=> select a from test1 union select a from test2 order by b;
>  a
> ---
>  1
>  2
>  3
>  4
> (4 rows)
> 
> Perhaps be more specific?
> 

Removed.

> 
> * SELECT ... UNION ... GROUP BY fails if column types disagree
> 
> Shouldn't it?
> 

Removed.

> 
> * Allow user to define char1 column
> 
> Both of
> create table test (a char);
> create table test (a char(1));
> seem to work.
> 

Marked as done.

> 
> * Add support for & operator
> 
> To do what? I can only see this specified in embedded SQL. More specific
> here as well?

They want to use it for some bitwise stuff.  I think we have a bit type
somewhere.


> 
> 
> * Make Absolutetime/Relativetime int4 because time_t can be int8 on some
> ports
> 
> This is done.

Marked as done.  I think your copy is a little old because dash marks
appear on my copy.
> 
> 
> * Make type equivalency apply to aggregates
> 
> This is done.
> 

Already marked.

> 
> * -Add ALTER TABLE DROP/ALTER COLUMN feature
> 
> Ain't gonna happen. (Okay, the ALTER COLUMN part is, but not the rest.)
> 

I understand, and think it is a shame.

> 
> * Add PL/Perl(Mark Hollomon)
> 
> I understand this is done as well. Someone might want to incorporate this
> into the build process, as well as add it into createlang.

Marked as done.

> 
> 
> * Pre-generate lex and yacc output so not required for install
> 
> Done.

Marked as done.  Thanks for the updates.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://www.op.net/~candle pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
853-3000+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  830 Blythe Avenue +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Drexel Hill,
Pennsylvania19026
 


pgsql-hackers by date:

Previous
From: Tom Lane
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Re: ORDBMS
Next
From: The Hermit Hacker
Date:
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] [6.5.3] 'attribute not found'